Literature DB >> 33766140

SMPLIP-Score: predicting ligand binding affinity from simple and interpretable on-the-fly interaction fingerprint pattern descriptors.

Surendra Kumar1, Mi-Hyun Kim2.   

Abstract

In drug discovery, rapid and accurate prediction of protein-ligand binding affinities is a pivotal task for lead optimization with acceptable on-target potency as well as pharmacological efficacy. Furthermore, researchers hope for a high correlation between docking score and pose with key interactive residues, although scoring functions as free energy surrogates of protein-ligand complexes have failed to provide collinearity. Recently, various machine learning or deep learning methods have been proposed to overcome the drawbacks of scoring functions. Despite being highly accurate, their featurization process is complex and the meaning of the embedded features cannot directly be interpreted by human recognition without an additional feature analysis. Here, we propose SMPLIP-Score (Substructural Molecular and Protein-Ligand Interaction Pattern Score), a direct interpretable predictor of absolute binding affinity. Our simple featurization embeds the interaction fingerprint pattern on the ligand-binding site environment and molecular fragments of ligands into an input vectorized matrix for learning layers (random forest or deep neural network). Despite their less complex features than other state-of-the-art models, SMPLIP-Score achieved comparable performance, a Pearson's correlation coefficient up to 0.80, and a root mean square error up to 1.18 in pK units with several benchmark datasets (PDBbind v.2015, Astex Diverse Set, CSAR NRC HiQ, FEP, PDBbind NMR, and CASF-2016). For this model, generality, predictive power, ranking power, and robustness were examined using direct interpretation of feature matrices for specific targets.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Featurization; Interaction fingerprint pattern; Neural network; Protein–ligand binding affinity; Random forest; Substructural molecular fragments

Year:  2021        PMID: 33766140     DOI: 10.1186/s13321-021-00507-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cheminform        ISSN: 1758-2946            Impact factor:   5.514


  56 in total

1.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Analysis of structure-based virtual screening studies and characterization of identified active compounds.

Authors:  Peter Ripphausen; Dagmar Stumpfe; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.808

3.  Accurate prediction of the relative potencies of members of a series of kinase inhibitors using molecular docking and MM-GBSA scoring.

Authors:  Paul D Lyne; Michelle L Lamb; Jamal C Saeh
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 4.  Molecular mechanics methods for predicting protein-ligand binding.

Authors:  Niu Huang; Chakrapani Kalyanaraman; Katarzyna Bernacki; Matthew P Jacobson
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.676

5.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking.

Authors:  G Jones; P Willett; R C Glen; A R Leach; R Taylor
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-04-04       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Accurate and reliable prediction of relative ligand binding potency in prospective drug discovery by way of a modern free-energy calculation protocol and force field.

Authors:  Lingle Wang; Yujie Wu; Yuqing Deng; Byungchan Kim; Levi Pierce; Goran Krilov; Dmitry Lupyan; Shaughnessy Robinson; Markus K Dahlgren; Jeremy Greenwood; Donna L Romero; Craig Masse; Jennifer L Knight; Thomas Steinbrecher; Thijs Beuming; Wolfgang Damm; Ed Harder; Woody Sherman; Mark Brewer; Ron Wester; Mark Murcko; Leah Frye; Ramy Farid; Teng Lin; David L Mobley; William L Jorgensen; Bruce J Berne; Richard A Friesner; Robert Abel
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 7.  Structure-based Virtual Screening Approaches in Kinase-directed Drug Discovery.

Authors:  David Bajusz; Gyorgy G Ferenczy; Gyorgy M Keseru
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Learning from the ligand: using ligand-based features to improve binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Fergus Boyles; Charlotte M Deane; Garrett M Morris
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 1. The accuracy of binding free energy calculations based on molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Tingjun Hou; Junmei Wang; Youyong Li; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 10.  The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities.

Authors:  Samuel Genheden; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 6.098

View more
  6 in total

1.  fingeRNAt-A novel tool for high-throughput analysis of nucleic acid-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Natalia A Szulc; Zuzanna Mackiewicz; Janusz M Bujnicki; Filip Stefaniak
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.779

Review 2.  Artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches for drug design: challenges and opportunities for the pharmaceutical industries.

Authors:  Chandrabose Selvaraj; Ishwar Chandra; Sanjeev Kumar Singh
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 2.943

3.  PLAS-5k: Dataset of Protein-Ligand Affinities from Molecular Dynamics for Machine Learning Applications.

Authors:  Divya B Korlepara; C S Vasavi; Shruti Jeurkar; Pradeep Kumar Pal; Subhajit Roy; Sarvesh Mehta; Shubham Sharma; Vishal Kumar; Charuvaka Muvva; Bhuvanesh Sridharan; Akshit Garg; Rohit Modee; Agastya P Bhati; Divya Nayar; U Deva Priyakumar
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 8.501

4.  Explainable deep drug-target representations for binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Nelson R C Monteiro; Carlos J V Simões; Henrique V Ávila; Maryam Abbasi; José L Oliveira; Joel P Arrais
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Prediction of chemical warfare agents based on cholinergic array type meta-predictors.

Authors:  Surendra Kumar; Chandni Kumari; Sangjin Ahn; Hyoungrae Kim; Mi-Hyun Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Random-forest model for drug-target interaction prediction via Kullbeck-Leibler divergence.

Authors:  Sangjin Ahn; Si Eun Lee; Mi-Hyun Kim
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 8.489

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.