Literature DB >> 17203140

Molecular mechanics methods for predicting protein-ligand binding.

Niu Huang1, Chakrapani Kalyanaraman, Katarzyna Bernacki, Matthew P Jacobson.   

Abstract

Ligand binding affinity prediction is one of the most important applications of computational chemistry. However, accurately ranking compounds with respect to their estimated binding affinities to a biomolecular target remains highly challenging. We provide an overview of recent work using molecular mechanics energy functions to address this challenge. We briefly review methods that use molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo simulations to predict absolute and relative ligand binding free energies, as well as our own work in which we have developed a physics-based scoring method that can be applied to hundreds of thousands of compounds by invoking a number of simplifying approximations. In our previous studies, we have demonstrated that our scoring method is a promising approach for improving the discrimination between ligands that are known to bind and those that are presumed not to, in virtual screening of large compound databases. In new results presented here, we explore several improvements to our computational method including modifying the dielectric constant used for the protein and ligand interiors, and empirically scaling energy terms to compensate for deficiencies in the energy model. Future directions for further improving our physics-based scoring method are also discussed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17203140     DOI: 10.1039/b608269f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys        ISSN: 1463-9076            Impact factor:   3.676


  47 in total

1.  Understanding the stereospecific interactions of 3-deoxyphosphatidylinositol derivatives with the PTEN phosphatase domain.

Authors:  Qin Wang; Yang Wei; Madhusoodanan Mottamal; Mary F Roberts; Goran Krilov
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 2.518

Review 2.  From laptop to benchtop to bedside: structure-based drug design on protein targets.

Authors:  Lu Chen; John K Morrow; Hoang T Tran; Sharangdhar S Phatak; Lei Du-Cuny; Shuxing Zhang
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.116

3.  Search for non-nucleoside inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase using chemical similarity, molecular docking, and MM-GB/SA scoring.

Authors:  Gabriela Barreiro; Cristiano R W Guimarães; Ivan Tubert-Brohman; Theresa M Lyons; Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2007-10-20       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Predicting absolute ligand binding free energies to a simple model site.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Alan P Graves; John D Chodera; Andrea C McReynolds; Brian K Shoichet; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Role of the active-site solvent in the thermodynamics of factor Xa ligand binding.

Authors:  Robert Abel; Tom Young; Ramy Farid; Bruce J Berne; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Evolutionary constraints on structural similarity in orthologs and paralogs.

Authors:  Mark E Peterson; Feng Chen; Jeffery G Saven; David S Roos; Patricia C Babbitt; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 7.  Biomolecular simulation and modelling: status, progress and prospects.

Authors:  Marc W van der Kamp; Katherine E Shaw; Christopher J Woods; Adrian J Mulholland
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Blind tests of RNA-protein binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Kalli Kappel; Inga Jarmoskaite; Pavanapuresan P Vaidyanathan; William J Greenleaf; Daniel Herschlag; Rhiju Das
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Implicit ligand theory: rigorous binding free energies and thermodynamic expectations from molecular docking.

Authors:  David D L Minh
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Binding-site assessment by virtual fragment screening.

Authors:  Niu Huang; Matthew P Jacobson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.