Joy E Lawn1, Shams El Arifeen2, Sojib Bin Zaman3, Abu Bakkar Siddique2, Harriet Ruysen1, Ashish Kc4, Kimberly Peven1,5, Shafiqul Ameen2, Nishant Thakur6, Qazi Sadeq-Ur Rahman2, Nahya Salim7,8, Rejina Gurung6, Tazeen Tahsina2, Ahmed Ehsanur Rahman2, Patricia S Coffey9, Barbara Rawlins10, Louise T Day1. 1. The Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive, & Child, Health (MARCH) Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 2. Maternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), 68 Shahid Tajuddin Ahmed Sarani, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh. 3. Maternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), 68 Shahid Tajuddin Ahmed Sarani, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh. sojib@icddrb.org. 4. Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 5. Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK. 6. Research Division, Golden Community, Lalitpur, Nepal. 7. Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 8. Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 9. PATH, Seattle, WA, USA. 10. Maternal and Child Survival Program, jhpiego, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Umbilical cord hygiene prevents sepsis, a leading cause of neonatal mortality. The World Health Organization recommends 7.1% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) application to the umbilicus after home birth in high mortality contexts. In Bangladesh and Nepal, national policies recommend CHX use for all facility births. Population-based household surveys include optional questions on CHX use, but indicator validation studies are lacking. The Every Newborn Birth Indicators Research Tracking in Hospitals (EN-BIRTH) was an observational study assessing measurement validity for maternal and newborn indicators. This paper reports results regarding CHX. METHODS: The EN-BIRTH study (July 2017-July 2018) included three public hospitals in Bangladesh and Nepal where CHX cord application is routine. Clinical-observers collected tablet-based, time-stamped data regarding cord care during admission to labour and delivery wards as the gold standard to assess accuracy of women's report at exit survey, and of routine-register data. We calculated validity ratios and individual-level validation metrics; analysed coverage, quality and measurement gaps. We conducted qualitative interviews to assess barriers and enablers to routine register-recording. RESULTS: Umbilical cord care was observed for 12,379 live births. Observer-assessed CHX coverage was very high at 89.3-99.4% in all 3 hospitals, although slightly lower after caesarean births in Azimpur (86.8%), Bangladesh. Exit survey-reported coverage (0.4-45.9%) underestimated the observed coverage with substantial "don't know" responses (55.5-79.4%). Survey-reported validity ratios were all poor (0.01 to 0.38). Register-recorded coverage in the specific column in Bangladesh was underestimated by 0.2% in Kushtia but overestimated by 9.0% in Azimpur. Register-recorded validity ratios were good (0.9 to 1.1) in Bangladesh, and poor (0.8) in Nepal. The non-specific register column in Pokhara, Nepal substantially underestimated coverage (20.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Exit survey-report highly underestimated observed CHX coverage in all three hospitals. Routine register-recorded coverage was closer to observer-assessed coverage than survey reports in all hospitals, including for caesarean births, and was more accurately captured in hospitals with a specific register column. Inclusion of CHX cord care into registers, and tallied into health management information system platforms, is justified in countries with national policies for facility-based use, but requires implementation research to assess register design and data flow within health information systems.
BACKGROUND: Umbilical cord hygiene prevents sepsis, a leading cause of neonatal mortality. The World Health Organization recommends 7.1% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) application to the umbilicus after home birth in high mortality contexts. In Bangladesh and Nepal, national policies recommend CHX use for all facility births. Population-based household surveys include optional questions on CHX use, but indicator validation studies are lacking. The Every Newborn Birth Indicators Research Tracking in Hospitals (EN-BIRTH) was an observational study assessing measurement validity for maternal and newborn indicators. This paper reports results regarding CHX. METHODS: The EN-BIRTH study (July 2017-July 2018) included three public hospitals in Bangladesh and Nepal where CHX cord application is routine. Clinical-observers collected tablet-based, time-stamped data regarding cord care during admission to labour and delivery wards as the gold standard to assess accuracy of women's report at exit survey, and of routine-register data. We calculated validity ratios and individual-level validation metrics; analysed coverage, quality and measurement gaps. We conducted qualitative interviews to assess barriers and enablers to routine register-recording. RESULTS: Umbilical cord care was observed for 12,379 live births. Observer-assessed CHX coverage was very high at 89.3-99.4% in all 3 hospitals, although slightly lower after caesarean births in Azimpur (86.8%), Bangladesh. Exit survey-reported coverage (0.4-45.9%) underestimated the observed coverage with substantial "don't know" responses (55.5-79.4%). Survey-reported validity ratios were all poor (0.01 to 0.38). Register-recorded coverage in the specific column in Bangladesh was underestimated by 0.2% in Kushtia but overestimated by 9.0% in Azimpur. Register-recorded validity ratios were good (0.9 to 1.1) in Bangladesh, and poor (0.8) in Nepal. The non-specific register column in Pokhara, Nepal substantially underestimated coverage (20.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Exit survey-report highly underestimated observed CHX coverage in all three hospitals. Routine register-recorded coverage was closer to observer-assessed coverage than survey reports in all hospitals, including for caesarean births, and was more accurately captured in hospitals with a specific register column. Inclusion of CHX cord care into registers, and tallied into health management information system platforms, is justified in countries with national policies for facility-based use, but requires implementation research to assess register design and data flow within health information systems.
Authors: Shams El Arifeen; Luke C Mullany; Rasheduzzaman Shah; Ishtiaq Mannan; Syed M Rahman; M Radwanur R Talukder; Nazma Begum; Ahmed Al-Kabir; Gary L Darmstadt; Mathuram Santosham; Robert E Black; Abdullah H Baqui Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-02-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Luke C Mullany; Shams El Arifeen; Subarna K Khatry; Joanne Katz; Rashed Shah; Abdullah H Baqui; James M Tielsch Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Luke C Mullany; Rasheduzzaman Shah; Shams El Arifeen; Ishtiaq Mannan; Peter J Winch; Amber Hill; Gary L Darmstadt; Abdullah H Baqui Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-03-18 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Lawrence Mwananyanda; Cassandra Pierre; James Mwansa; Carter Cowden; A Russell Localio; Monica L Kapasa; Sylvia Machona; Chileshe Lukwesa Musyani; Moses M Chilufya; Gertrude Munanjala; Angela Lyondo; Matthew A Bates; Susan E Coffin; Davidson H Hamer Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2019-09-27 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Victoria Nankabirwa; Thorkild Tylleskär; Josephine Tumuhamye; James K Tumwine; Grace Ndeezi; José C Martines; Halvor Sommerfelt Journal: Trials Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 2.279