BACKGROUND: Up to half of neonatal deaths in high mortality settings are due to infections, many of which can originate through the freshly cut umbilical cord stump. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of two cord-cleansing regimens with the promotion of dry cord care in the prevention of neonatal mortality. DESIGN: We did a community-based, parallel cluster-randomised trial in Sylhet, Bangladesh. We divided the study area into 133 clusters, which were randomly assigned to one of the two chlorhexidine cleansing regimens (single cleansing as soon as possible after birth; daily cleansing for 7 days after birth) or promotion of dry cord care. Randomisation was done by use of a computer-generated sequence, stratified by cluster-specific participation in a previous trial. All livebirths were eligible; those visited within 7 days by a local female village health worker trained to deliver the cord care intervention were enrolled. We did not mask study workers and participants to the study interventions. Our primary outcome was neonatal mortality (within 28 days of birth) per 1000 livebirths, which we analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00434408. RESULTS:Between June, 2007, and September, 2009, we enrolled 29 760 newborn babies (10 329, 9423, and 10 008 in the multiple-cleansing, single-cleansing, and dry cord care groups, respectively). Neonatal mortality was lower in the single-cleansing group (22·5 per 1000 livebirths) than it was in the dry cord care group (28·3 per 1000 livebirths; relative risk [RR] 0·80 [95% CI] 0·65-0·98). Neonatal mortality in the multiple-cleansing group (26·6 per 1000 livebirths) was not statistically significantly lower than it was in the dry cord care group (RR 0·94 [0·78-1·14]). Compared with the dry cord care group, we recorded a statistically significant reduction in the occurrence of severe cord infection (redness with pus) in the multiple-cleansing group (risk per 1000 livebirths=4·2 vs risk per 1000 livebirths=1·2; RR 0·35 [0·15-0·81]) but not in the single-cleansing group (risk per 1000 livebirths=3·3; RR 0·77 [0·40-1·48]). INTERPRETATION:Chlorhexidine cleansing of a neonate's umbilical cord can save lives, but further studies are needed to establish the best frequency with which to deliver the intervention. FUNDING: United States Agency for International Development and Save the Children's Saving Newborn Lives program, through a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Copyright Â
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Up to half of neonatal deaths in high mortality settings are due to infections, many of which can originate through the freshly cut umbilical cord stump. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of two cord-cleansing regimens with the promotion of dry cord care in the prevention of neonatal mortality. DESIGN: We did a community-based, parallel cluster-randomised trial in Sylhet, Bangladesh. We divided the study area into 133 clusters, which were randomly assigned to one of the two chlorhexidine cleansing regimens (single cleansing as soon as possible after birth; daily cleansing for 7 days after birth) or promotion of dry cord care. Randomisation was done by use of a computer-generated sequence, stratified by cluster-specific participation in a previous trial. All livebirths were eligible; those visited within 7 days by a local female village health worker trained to deliver the cord care intervention were enrolled. We did not mask study workers and participants to the study interventions. Our primary outcome was neonatal mortality (within 28 days of birth) per 1000 livebirths, which we analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00434408. RESULTS: Between June, 2007, and September, 2009, we enrolled 29 760 newborn babies (10 329, 9423, and 10 008 in the multiple-cleansing, single-cleansing, and dry cord care groups, respectively). Neonatal mortality was lower in the single-cleansing group (22·5 per 1000 livebirths) than it was in the dry cord care group (28·3 per 1000 livebirths; relative risk [RR] 0·80 [95% CI] 0·65-0·98). Neonatal mortality in the multiple-cleansing group (26·6 per 1000 livebirths) was not statistically significantly lower than it was in the dry cord care group (RR 0·94 [0·78-1·14]). Compared with the dry cord care group, we recorded a statistically significant reduction in the occurrence of severe cord infection (redness with pus) in the multiple-cleansing group (risk per 1000 livebirths=4·2 vs risk per 1000 livebirths=1·2; RR 0·35 [0·15-0·81]) but not in the single-cleansing group (risk per 1000 livebirths=3·3; RR 0·77 [0·40-1·48]). INTERPRETATION:Chlorhexidine cleansing of a neonate's umbilical cord can save lives, but further studies are needed to establish the best frequency with which to deliver the intervention. FUNDING: United States Agency for International Development and Save the Children's Saving Newborn Lives program, through a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Copyright Â
Authors: Amnesty E LeFevre; Samuel D Shillcutt; Hugh R Waters; Sabbir Haider; Shams El Arifeen; Ishtiaq Mannan; Habibur R Seraji; Rasheduzzaman Shah; Gary L Darmstadt; Steve N Wall; Emma K Williams; Robert E Black; Mathuram Santosham; Abdullah H Baqui Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2013-07-12 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Aaron M Milstone; Penny Bamford; Susan W Aucott; Ningfeng Tang; Kimberly R White; Cynthia F Bearer Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2013-10-14 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Davidson H Hamer; Julie M Herlihy; Kebby Musokotwane; Bowen Banda; Chipo Mpamba; Boyd Mwangelwa; Portipher Pilingana; Donald M Thea; Jonathon L Simon; Kojo Yeboah-Antwi; Caroline Grogan; Katherine E A Semrau Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2015-02-02 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Anne Cc Lee; Luke C Mullany; Karima Ladhani; Jamal Uddin; Dipak Mitra; Parvez Ahmed; Parul Christian; Alain Labrique; Sushil K DasGupta; R Peter Lokken; Mohammed Quaiyum; Abdullah H Baqui Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Mohamed A Jamal; Ray Y Hachem; Joel Rosenblatt; Mark J McArthur; Edd Felix; Ying Jiang; Ramesh C Tailor; Issam Raad Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-06-29 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Luke C Mullany; Shams El Arifeen; Subarna K Khatry; Joanne Katz; Rashed Shah; Abdullah H Baqui; James M Tielsch Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Pavani K Ram; Farzana Begum; Christina Crabtree-Ide; Mohammad Rofi Uddin; Anne M Weaver; Md Golam Dostogir Harun; Jelena V Allen; Swapna Kumar; Sharifa Nasreen; Stephen P Luby; Shams El Arifeen Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 2.345