| Literature DB >> 33763996 |
Jie Dong1, Jie Yu2,3, Zekun Li2, Song Gao2, Hongwei Wang2, Shengyu Yang4, Liangliang Wu2, Chungen Lan2, Tiansuo Zhao2, Chuntao Gao2, Zhe Liu5, Xiuchao Wang2, Jihui Hao2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malnutrition and muscle wasting are common features frequently observed in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients with cancer cachexia. They are associated with reduced survival and quality of life. Nutrition therapy is an important part of multimodal cancer care in PDAC. However, due to the complexity of nutrition assessment, only 30-60% of patients with nutritional risks receive nutritional treatment at present. It is important to identify biomarkers that may be used to improve management of PDAC-associated malnutrition. Serum insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2) has emerged as a potential serum biomarker in a variety of tumours. However, its association with malnutrition and muscle wasting in PDAC is unclear.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarker; Cachexia; IGFBP2; Malnutrition; Muscle wasting; PDAC
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33763996 PMCID: PMC8200427 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12692
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle ISSN: 2190-5991 Impact factor: 12.910
Figure 1Expression of insulin‐like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2) is elevated in the tissues of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). (A) Representative and quantitation of IGFBP2 immunohistochemical staining in normal pancreatic tissue and PDAC tissues (magnification, ×200). (B) Divided serum levels of IGFBP2 into six groups, the immunohistochemistry (IHC) was divided into nine grades according to the score, and their correlation coefficient was 0.562 (P < 0.001). ELISA, enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay.
Correlation between tumour IGFBP2 expression and clinicopathological features in a cohort of 98 PDAC patients
| IGFBP2 |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
|
| 0.162 | 0.111 | ||
| Male | 18 | 32 | ||
| Female | 25 | 23 | ||
|
| 0.062 | 0.541 | ||
| <65 | 33 | 45 | ||
| ≥65 | 10 | 10 | ||
|
| 0.024 | 0.815 | ||
| <2.5 cm | 7 | 8 | ||
| ≥2.5 cm | 36 | 47 | ||
|
| 0.348 | <0.001 | ||
| I | 12 | 2 | ||
| II | 27 | 40 | ||
| III | 4 | 8 | ||
| IV | 0 | 5 | ||
|
| 0.144 | 0.159 | ||
| 1 | 7 | 2 | ||
| 2 | 16 | 24 | ||
| 3 | 20 | 29 | ||
|
| 0.398 | <0.001 | ||
| <9 | 24 | 11 | ||
| ≥9 | 19 | 44 | ||
G, grade; IGFBP2, insulin‐like growth factor binding protein 2; PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; PG‐SGA, Patient‐Generated Subjective Global Assessment; pTNM, pathological tumour–node–metastasis.
P values were obtained by the Spearman rank correlation test.
p < 0.001.
Figure 2Serum insulin‐like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2) level is increased in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients with severe malnutrition and correlates with shorter survival. Serum level of IGFBP2 was measured by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. (A) Serum IGFBP2 levels in healthy control and in patients with PDAC. (B) Higher serum IGFBP2 level concentrations in PDAC patients with Patient‐Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG‐SGA) ≥9 compared with patients with PG‐SGA < 9. ***P < 0.001. (C) Receiver operating characteristic curve of serum IGFBP2 level for PG‐SGA. (D) Association between serum IGFBP2 levels and overall survival. Significance (P = 0.003) was analysed with the Kaplan–Meier survival curves.
Figure 3Increasing of serum insulin‐like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2) levels in tumour‐bearing mouse and emerging the symptom of malnutrition. (A) Serum IGFBP2 level was measured by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay after animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. (B, C) Body weight and food intake were measured daily per week after subcutaneous tumour transplantation. (D, E) Histopathological detection of gastrocnemius muscle (haematoxylin and eosin ×20) and determined by quantitation of the cross‐sectional area (CSA). ***P < 0.001.
Figure 4Serum insulin‐like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2) levels are associated with skeletal muscle index (SMI) and induced muscle wasting. (A) Axial computed tomography images of the third lumbar vertebra region with skeletal muscle highlighted in red [−29 to 150 Hounsfield units (HU)]. (B, C) Scatter plot highlights the relationship between serum IGFBP2 levels and SMI (n = 98; r = −0.600; P < 0.001) and HU (n = 98; r = −0.532; P < 0.001) among pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients. Results are plotted as mean ± standard deviation.
Correlation between serum IGFBP2 levels and prealbumin, absolute lymphocyte, and CRP among PDAC patients
| IGFBP2 (ng/mL) |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <343.2 ( | ≥343.2 ( | |||
|
| 0.493 | <0.001 | ||
| N | 28 | 12 | ||
| Ab | 12 | 46 | ||
|
| 0.029 | 0.776 | ||
| N | 28 | 39 | ||
| Ab | 12 | 19 | ||
|
| 0.332 | 0.002 | ||
| N | 30 | 24 | ||
| Ab | 10 | 34 | ||
343.5 ng/mL, cut‐off of serum insulin‐like growth factor binding protein 2 levels for Patient‐Generated Subjective Global Assessment; Ab, abnormal; CRP, C‐reactive protein; IGFBP2, insulin‐like growth factor binding protein 2; N, normal; PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
P values were obtained by the Spearman rank correlation test.
p < 0.01.
p < 0.001.
Figure 5Overexpression of insulin‐like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2) cell line induced malnutrition and muscle wasting in mice. (A) Western blotting assessment of IGFBP2 protein expressions after stable transfection with Pan02 PLV‐IGFBP2 and Pan02 PLKO‐IGFBP2. (B) Terminal peripheral blood samples were collected, and IGFBP2 levels in serum were measured using specific enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. (C–F) A week after subcutaneous tumour transplantation, body weight and food intake were measured every day. (G–I) The effects of IGFBP2 overexpression and knock‐down on the gastrocnemius muscles as determined by haematoxylin and eosin staining (×20), Oil Red O staining (orange lipid stains), and Masson's trichrome staining (blue collagen stains), which were confirmed by quantitation. Results are plotted as mean ± standard deviation. CSA, cross‐sectional area.
Figure 6Insulin‐like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2) induced muscle wasting via regulating muscle RING finger 1 (MuRF1) and atrogin‐1 in C57 mouse. (A) Reverse transcription PCR assessment of MuRF1 and atrogin‐1 mRNA expression in gastrocnemius muscles of PLV‐IGFBP2 mouse and PLKO‐IGFBP2 mice. (B) Western blotting assessment of MuRF1 and atrogin‐1 protein expression in gastrocnemius muscles of PLV‐IGFBP2 mouse and PLKO‐IGFBP2 mice.