| Literature DB >> 33762534 |
Arash Azizi1, Carlo Prati1, Riccardo Schiavon1, Raquel Michelle Fitzgibbon1, Chiara Pirani1, Francesco Iacono1, Gian Andrea Pelliccioni1, Andrea Spinelli1, Fausto Zamparini1, Pietro Puddu2, Giovanni Bolelli2, Luigi Generali3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To define surface, mechanical, microstructural and metallurgical features of conventional One-Shape (OShape) and heat-treated OneCurve (OCurve) nickel-titanium instruments.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33762534 PMCID: PMC8056813 DOI: 10.14744/eej.2021.63634
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Endod J ISSN: 2548-0839
Results of the analysis carried out during evaluation of OShape and Ocurve instruments
| Tools | n | Analysis | After SCU | Evaluation criteria | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEM | 4 OCurve | Wear test | Yes | - Overall morphology | No evidence of wear was noticed; debris still present after sterilization protocol |
| Cyclic fatigue testing machine | 20 OCurve | CFT | No | - Time until fracture (T) | T and NCF of OCurve were significantly higher than OShape OCurve AS showed even a higher T and NCF than OCurve and OShape |
| FEG-SEM | 2 OCurve | Fractographic analysis | No | - Crack initiation points | Multiple initiation points and wide striation areas in OCurve; single initiation points and little striation areas in OShape |
| EDX | 2 OCurve | Surface chemical analysis | Yes | - Chemical composition of surface | Both OCurve and OShape surface exhibited Ni, Ti and O; O peak was more evident in OCurve than OShape |
| Raman | 1 OCurve | Surface chemical analysis | Yes | - Chemical composition of surface | Presence of TiO2 (rutile) on OCurve surface |
| XRD | 3 OCurve | Inner cristallographic | Yes | - Martensite composition | At 25°C the main composition of both OCurve and OShape is austenitic; OCurve showed presence of martensite and R-phase |
| Metallographic microscope | 2 OCurve | Inner cristallographic composition | Yes | - Martensite | OCurve showed more presence of martensite grains compared to OShape |
| DSC | 1 OCurve | Inner cristallographic composition | Yes | - Temperatures of phase transformation | OCurve is mainly martensitic at body temperature; OShape is austenitic |
| FIB | 1 OCurve | Surface oxide layer measure | Yes | - Oxide layer thickness | A thin (<100nm) oxide layer was observed in OCurve; the layer was too thin to be determined |
SCU: Simulated clinical use, CFT: Cyclic fatigue test, NCF: Number of cycles to fracture, OCurve: OneCurve, OShape: OneShape, OCurve AS: OCurve after one cycle of autoclave sterilization
Figure 1Micrographs of O Shape (a, b, e, f, i, j, m, n) and O Curve (c, d, g, h, k, l, o, p) instruments before and after simulated clinical use (SCU) at the same points and angulations. Tip (a-h) and cutting edges at 5 mms from the tip (i-p) were inspected at increasing magnification (50x–5000x) to verify wear features. Round grooves were detected on new instruments (a, c, e, g, i, k, m, o) and debris were noticeable on the surface of used instruments (b, d, f, h, j, l, n, p)
Figure 2SEM micrographs of OCurve instruments revealing the presence of grooves (range 3.93 µm–28.26 µm) on the surface of the shaft at lower (400x) and higher (6000x) magnification
Cyclic fatigue test results. Mean, standard deviations (SD) and P value of the Time to failure (sec), Number of cycles to fracture (NCF) and the length of the fractured fragment of the tested instruments
| Time to failure (sec±SD) | NCF (mean±SD) | Fracture length (mm±SD) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| OShape | 13.50±7.74a | 74.30±45.72a | 7.41±0.47a |
| OCurve | 88.81±13.03b | 517.35±76.20b | 7.34±1.33a |
| OCurve AS | 110.10±22.42c | 642.06±130.80c | 7.14±0.86a |
P value set at 0.05. Superscript letters indicate statistical differences between groups. NCF: Number of cycles to fracture, OCurve: One curve, OCurve AS: One curve after 1 cycle of autoclave sterilization, OShape: One shape
Figure 3Fractographic analysis of OCurve (a) and OShape (b) instruments showed the propagation of the fatigue striations (white arrow) in correspondence of the initiation of the crack. A wide dimpled area is noticeable (*) in the upper side of micrograph. In OShape (b), the fractographic surface was totally covered by dimples
Figure 4Metallurgical analysis of OCurve instrument: tip (a) and coronal portion (b) of new file; coronal portion of SCU file (c). Prevalence of martensitic grains with parallel orientation in correspondence of the tip and randomly oriented in the coronal portion on the OCurve instruments was disclosed
Figure 5DSC traces of new and SCU OShape instruments (a) and OCurve instruments (b)