Literature DB >> 33761958

Exploring the barriers and facilitators of psychological safety in primary care teams: a qualitative study.

Ridhaa Remtulla1, Arwa Hagana2, Nour Houbby2, Kajal Ruparell2, Nivaran Aojula2, Anannya Menon2, Santhosh G Thavarajasingam2, Edgar Meyer3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Psychological safety is the concept by which individuals feel comfortable expressing themselves in a work environment, without fear of embarrassment or criticism from others. Psychological safety in healthcare is associated with improved patient safety outcomes, enhanced physician engagement and fostering a creative learning environment. Therefore, it is important to establish the key levers which can act as facilitators or barriers to establishing psychological safety. Existing literature on psychological safety in healthcare teams has focused on secondary care, primarily from an individual profession perspective. In light of the increased focus on multidisciplinary work in primary care and the need for team-based studies, given that psychological safety is a team-based construct, this study sought to investigate the facilitators and barriers to psychological safety in primary care multidisciplinary teams.
METHODS: A mono-method qualitative research design was chosen for this study. Healthcare professionals from four primary care teams (n = 20) were recruited using snowball sampling. Data collection was through semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to generate findings.
RESULTS: Three meta themes surfaced: shared beliefs, facilitators and barriers to psychological safety. The shared beliefs offered insights into the teams' background functioning, providing important context to the facilitators and barriers of psychological safety specific to each team. Four barriers to psychological safety were identified: hierarchy, perceived lack of knowledge, personality and authoritarian leadership. Eight facilitators surfaced: leader and leader inclusiveness, open culture, vocal personality, support in silos, boundary spanner, chairing meetings, strong interpersonal relationships and small groups.
CONCLUSION: This study emphasises that factors influencing psychological safety can be individualistic, team-based or organisational. Although previous literature has largely focused on the role of leaders in promoting psychological safety, safe environments can be created by all team members. Members can facilitate psychological safety in instances where positive leadership behaviours are lacking - for example, strengthening interpersonal relationships, finding support in silos or rotating the chairperson in team meetings. It is anticipated that these findings will encourage practices to reflect on their team dynamics and adopt strategies to ensure every member's voice is heard.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community; General practice; Primary care; Psychological safety; Teamwork

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33761958      PMCID: PMC7988250          DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06232-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1472-6963            Impact factor:   2.655


  31 in total

1.  Don't follow your leader: challenging erroneous decisions.

Authors:  Michael J Moneypenny; Arpan Guha; Simon J Mercer; Helen O'Sullivan; Judy McKimm
Journal:  Br J Hosp Med (Lond)       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 0.825

Review 2.  "Renters" or "owners"? Residents' perceptions and behaviors regarding error reduction in teaching hospitals: a literature review.

Authors:  Jamie S Padmore; Joseph Jaeger; Lee Ann Riesenberg; Kelly P Karpovich; Joel C Rosenfeld; Carl A Patow
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Communication and psychological safety in veterans health administration work environments.

Authors:  Nancy J Yanchus; Ryan Derickson; Scott C Moore; Daniele Bologna; Katerine Osatuke
Journal:  J Health Organ Manag       Date:  2014

4.  Speaking up about patient safety concerns: the influence of safety management approaches and climate on nurses' willingness to speak up.

Authors:  Carien W Alingh; Jeroen D H van Wijngaarden; Karina van de Voorde; Jaap Paauwe; Robbert Huijsman
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 7.035

5.  Behavioral integrity for safety, priority of safety, psychological safety, and patient safety: a team-level study.

Authors:  Hannes Leroy; Bart Dierynck; Frederik Anseel; Tony Simons; Jonathon R B Halbesleben; Deirdre McCaughey; Grant T Savage; Luc Sels
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2012-09-17

6.  Influence of surgeon behavior on trainee willingness to speak up: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marco J Barzallo Salazar; Howard Minkoff; Jyothshna Bayya; Brian Gillett; Helen Onoriode; Jeremy Weedon; Lisa Altshuler; Nelli Fisher
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  To Address Burnout in Oncology, We Must Look to Teams: Reflections on an Organizational Science Approach.

Authors:  Chelsea A LeNoble; Riley Pegram; Marissa L Shuffler; Tranaka Fuqua; Donald W Wiper
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2020-02-19

8.  Residents' reluctance to challenge negative hierarchy in the operating room: a qualitative study.

Authors:  M Dylan Bould; Stephanie Sutherland; Devin T Sydor; Viren Naik; Zeev Friedman
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation.

Authors:  Shazia Jamshed
Journal:  J Basic Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-09

Review 10.  Importance of Leadership Style towards Quality of Care Measures in Healthcare Settings: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Danae F Sfantou; Aggelos Laliotis; Athina E Patelarou; Dimitra Sifaki-Pistolla; Michail Matalliotakis; Evridiki Patelarou
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.