Literature DB >> 29954948

Speaking up about patient safety concerns: the influence of safety management approaches and climate on nurses' willingness to speak up.

Carien W Alingh1,2, Jeroen D H van Wijngaarden1, Karina van de Voorde2, Jaap Paauwe1,2, Robbert Huijsman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Speaking up is important for patient safety, but healthcare professionals often hesitate to voice their concerns. Direct supervisors have an important role in influencing speaking up. However, good insight into the relationship between managers' behaviour and employees' perceptions about whether speaking up is safe and worthwhile is still lacking. AIM: To explore the relationships between control-based and commitment-based safety management, climate for safety, psychological safety and nurses' willingness to speak up.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study, resulting in a sample of 980 nurses and 93 nurse managers working in Dutch clinical hospital wards. To test our hypotheses, hierarchical regression analyses (at ward level) and multilevel regression analyses were conducted.
RESULTS: Significantly positive associations were found between nurses' perceptions of control-based safety management and climate for safety (β=0.74; p<0.001), and between the perceived levels of commitment-based management and team psychological safety (β=0.36; p<0.01). Furthermore, team psychological safety is found to be positively related to nurses' speaking up attitudes (B=0.24; t=2.04; p<0.05). The relationship between nurse-rated commitment-based safety management and nurses' willingness to speak up is fully mediated by team psychological safety.
CONCLUSION: Results provide initial support that nurses who perceive higher levels of commitment-based safety management feel safer to take interpersonal risks and are more willing to speak up about patient safety concerns. Furthermore, nurses' perceptions of control-based safety management are found to be positively related to a climate for safety, although no association was found with speaking up. Both control-based and commitment-based management approaches seem to be relevant for managing patient safety, but when it comes to encouraging speaking up, a commitment-based safety management approach seems to be most valuable. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  management; nurses; patient safety

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29954948     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  11 in total

1.  What are the participants' perspective and the system-based impact of a standardized, inter-professional morbidity/mortality-conferences in a children's hospital?

Authors:  Martin Stocker; Philipp Szavay; Birgit Wernz; Thomas J Neuhaus; Dirk Lehnick; Sabine Zundel
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-07-25

2.  A behavioural study of obedience in health professional students.

Authors:  Efrem Violato; Brian Witschen; Emilio Violato; Sharla King
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 3.629

3.  Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC): a systematic review of the psychometric properties of 62 international studies.

Authors:  Patrick Waterson; Eva-Maria Carman; Tanja Manser; Antje Hammer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Exploring the barriers and facilitators of psychological safety in primary care teams: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ridhaa Remtulla; Arwa Hagana; Nour Houbby; Kajal Ruparell; Nivaran Aojula; Anannya Menon; Santhosh G Thavarajasingam; Edgar Meyer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  A concept analysis of psychological safety: Further understanding for application to health care.

Authors:  Ayano Ito; Kana Sato; Yoshie Yumoto; Miki Sasaki; Yasuko Ogata
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-10-15

6.  The Psychological Safety Scale of the Safety, Communication, Operational, Reliability, and Engagement (SCORE) Survey: A Brief, Diagnostic, and Actionable Metric for the Ability to Speak Up in Healthcare Settings.

Authors:  Kathryn C Adair; Annemarie Heath; Maureen A Frye; Allan Frankel; Joshua Proulx; Kyle J Rehder; Erin Eckert; Caitlin Penny; Franz Belz; J Bryan Sexton
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 2.243

7.  Psychological Safety as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Inclusive Leadership and Nurse Voice Behaviors and Error Reporting.

Authors:  Seung Eun Lee; V Susan Dahinten
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.928

8.  Association between Hospital Nurses' Perception of Patient Safety Management and Standard Precaution Adherence: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Ji-Hye Lim; Jung-Won Ahn; Youn-Jung Son
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Exploring psychological safety in healthcare teams to inform the development of interventions: combining observational, survey and interview data.

Authors:  Róisín O'Donovan; Eilish McAuliffe
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  The presence and potential impact of psychological safety in the healthcare setting: an evidence synthesis.

Authors:  K E Grailey; E Murray; T Reader; S J Brett
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.