Literature DB >> 22985115

Behavioral integrity for safety, priority of safety, psychological safety, and patient safety: a team-level study.

Hannes Leroy1, Bart Dierynck, Frederik Anseel, Tony Simons, Jonathon R B Halbesleben, Deirdre McCaughey, Grant T Savage, Luc Sels.   

Abstract

This article clarifies how leader behavioral integrity for safety helps solve follower's double bind between adhering to safety protocols and speaking up about mistakes against protocols. Path modeling of survey data in 54 nursing teams showed that head nurse behavioral integrity for safety positively relates to both team priority of safety and psychological safety. In turn, team priority of safety and team psychological safety were, respectively, negatively and positively related with the number of treatment errors that were reported to head nurses. We further demonstrated an interaction effect between team priority of safety and psychological safety on reported errors such that the relationship between team priority of safety and the number of errors was stronger for higher levels of team psychological safety. Finally, we showed that both team priority of safety and team psychological safety mediated the relationship between leader behavioral integrity for safety and reported treatment errors. These results suggest that although adhering to safety protocols and admitting mistakes against those protocols show opposite relations to reported treatment errors, both are important to improving patient safety and both are fostered by leaders who walk their safety talk. (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22985115     DOI: 10.1037/a0030076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9010


  19 in total

1.  Psychological safety and infection prevention practices: Results from a national survey.

Authors:  M Todd Greene; Heather M Gilmartin; Sanjay Saint
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.918

2.  Role of Supervisor Behavioral Integrity for Safety in the Relationship Between Top-Management Safety Climate, Safety Motivation, and Safety Performance.

Authors:  Mehmet Peker; Onur C Doğru; Gülgün Meşe
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2022-03-18

Review 3.  Integrating teamwork, clinician occupational well-being and patient safety - development of a conceptual framework based on a systematic review.

Authors:  Annalena Welp; Tanja Manser
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Measuring psychological safety in healthcare teams: developing an observational measure to complement survey methods.

Authors:  Róisín O'Donovan; Desirée Van Dun; Eilish McAuliffe
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Measuring the Psychological Security of Urban Residents: Construction and Validation of a New Scale.

Authors:  Jiaqi Wang; Ruyin Long; Hong Chen; Qianwen Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-25

6.  Predicting Nurses' Psychological Safety Based on the Forgiveness Skill.

Authors:  Abbas Rahmati; Maryam Poormirzaei
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

7.  A systematic review exploring the content and outcomes of interventions to improve psychological safety, speaking up and voice behaviour.

Authors:  Róisín O'Donovan; Eilish McAuliffe
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Food Safety Gaps between Consumers' Expectations and Perceptions: Development and Verification of a Gap-Assessment Tool.

Authors:  Paohui Lin; Hsientang Tsai; Tzuya Ho
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  How important are the team dynamics in the battle against COVID-19?

Authors:  Kajal Ruparell
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Exploring psychological safety in healthcare teams to inform the development of interventions: combining observational, survey and interview data.

Authors:  Róisín O'Donovan; Eilish McAuliffe
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.