Victoria L Tiase1, William Hull2, Mary M McFarland3, Katherine A Sward2, Guilherme Del Fiol4, Catherine Staes2, Charlene Weir4, Mollie R Cummins2. 1. University of Utah, College of Nursing, The Value Institute, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA. 2. University of Utah, College of Nursing, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. 3. University of Utah, Eccles Health Sciences Library, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. 4. Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Patient-generated health data (PGHD) are clinically relevant data captured by patients outside of the traditional care setting. Clinical use of PGHD has emerged as an essential issue. This study explored the evidence to determine the extent of and describe the characteristics of PGHD integration into electronic health records (EHRs). METHODS: In August 2019, we conducted a systematic scoping review. We included studies with complete, partial, or in-progress PGHD and EHR integration within a clinical setting. The retrieved articles were screened for eligibility by 2 researchers, and data from eligible articles were abstracted, coded, and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies met inclusion criteria after screening 9463 abstracts. Most of the study designs were pilots and all were published between 2013 and 2019. Types of PGHD were biometric and patient activity (57.9%), questionnaires and surveys (36.8%), and health history (5.3%). Diabetes was the most common patient condition (42.1%) for PGHD collection. Active integration (57.9%) was slightly more common than passive integration (31.6%). We categorized emergent themes into the 3 steps of PGHD flow. Themes emerged concerning resource requirements, data delivery to the EHR, and preferences for review. DISCUSSION: PGHD integration into EHRs appears to be at an early stage. PGHD have the potential to close health care gaps and support personalized medicine. Efforts are needed to understand how to optimize PGHD integration into EHRs considering resources, standards for EHR delivery, and clinical workflows.
OBJECTIVES: Patient-generated health data (PGHD) are clinically relevant data captured by patients outside of the traditional care setting. Clinical use of PGHD has emerged as an essential issue. This study explored the evidence to determine the extent of and describe the characteristics of PGHD integration into electronic health records (EHRs). METHODS: In August 2019, we conducted a systematic scoping review. We included studies with complete, partial, or in-progress PGHD and EHR integration within a clinical setting. The retrieved articles were screened for eligibility by 2 researchers, and data from eligible articles were abstracted, coded, and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies met inclusion criteria after screening 9463 abstracts. Most of the study designs were pilots and all were published between 2013 and 2019. Types of PGHD were biometric and patient activity (57.9%), questionnaires and surveys (36.8%), and health history (5.3%). Diabetes was the most common patient condition (42.1%) for PGHD collection. Active integration (57.9%) was slightly more common than passive integration (31.6%). We categorized emergent themes into the 3 steps of PGHD flow. Themes emerged concerning resource requirements, data delivery to the EHR, and preferences for review. DISCUSSION: PGHD integration into EHRs appears to be at an early stage. PGHD have the potential to close health care gaps and support personalized medicine. Efforts are needed to understand how to optimize PGHD integration into EHRs considering resources, standards for EHR delivery, and clinical workflows.
Authors: Jenna L Marquard; Lawrence Garber; Barry Saver; Brian Amster; Michael Kelleher; Peggy Preusse Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2013-06-22 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Lynne I Wagner; Julian Schink; Michael Bass; Shalini Patel; Maria Varela Diaz; Nan Rothrock; Timothy Pearman; Richard Gershon; Frank J Penedo; Steven Rosen; David Cella Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Susan L Moore; Henry H Fischer; Andrew W Steele; M Joshua Durfee; David Ginosar; Cecilia Rice-Peterson; Jeffrey D Berschling; Arthur J Davidson Journal: Healthc (Amst) Date: 2014-02-05
Authors: Rajiv B Kumar; Nira D Goren; David E Stark; Dennis P Wall; Christopher A Longhurst Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2016-03-27 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Nicholas Genes; Samantha Violante; Christine Cetrangol; Linda Rogers; Eric E Schadt; Yu-Feng Yvonne Chan Journal: NPJ Digit Med Date: 2018-06-20
Authors: Renwen Zhang; Eleanor R Burgess; Madhu C Reddy; Nan E Rothrock; Surabhi Bhatt; Luke V Rasmussen; Zeeshan Butt; Justin B Starren Journal: JAMIA Open Date: 2019-01-30
Authors: Daphne R Friedman; Vikas Patil; Chunyang Li; Kelli M Rassmussen; Zachary Burningham; Susan Hamilton-Hill; Michael J Kelley; Ahmad S Halwani Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2022-02
Authors: Nansu Zong; Andrew Wen; Sungrim Moon; Sunyang Fu; Liwei Wang; Yiqing Zhao; Yue Yu; Ming Huang; Yanshan Wang; Gang Zheng; Michelle M Mielke; James R Cerhan; Hongfang Liu Journal: NPJ Digit Med Date: 2022-06-14
Authors: Victoria L Tiase; Sarah E Wawrzynski; Katherine A Sward; Guilherme Del Fiol; Catherine Staes; Charlene Weir; Mollie R Cummins Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 2.342