Literature DB >> 30985598

Engaging Patients and Clinicians in Online Reporting of Adverse Effects During Chemotherapy for Cancer: The eRAPID System (Electronic Patient Self-Reporting of Adverse Events: Patient Information and aDvice).

Kate Absolom1, Andrea Gibson, Galina Velikova.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: During cancer treatment the timely detection and management of adverse events is essential for patient safety and maintaining the quality of life. Electronic patient self-Reporting of Adverse events: Patient Information and aDvice (eRAPID) was devised to support oncology practice, by allowing patients to self-report symptoms online at home during and beyond cancer treatment. Fundamentally the eRAPID intervention delivers immediate severity-tailored feedback directly to patients to guide self-management strategies or hospital contact. Patient data are available in electronic health records for hospital staff to access and review as part of clinical assessments. METHODS FOR INTERPRETING AND ADDRESSING PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME (PRO) SCORES:: The eRAPID intervention has 5 main interconnecting components (clinical integration into standard care pathways, patient symptom reports, self-management advice, information technology, and staff/patient training). Following guidance for the development of complex interventions and using a mixed methods approach, eRAPID was created through a number of stages and tested in a series of usability settings before undergoing systematic evaluation in a randomized controlled trial. These developmental stages are described here with a focus on how decisions were made to enhance patient and professional engagement with symptom reports and encourage interpretation and clinical utilization of the data. DISCUSSION: Clinically embedded PRO interventions involve a number of elements and stakeholders with different requirements. Following extensive developmental work eRAPID was pragmatically designed to fit into current oncology practices for reviewing and managing chemotherapy-related toxicities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30985598     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  8 in total

1.  A narrative review of current evidence supporting the implementation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures in the management of chronic diseases.

Authors:  Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi; Devika Nair; John Devin Peipert; Kara Schick-Makaroff; Istvan Mucsi
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 5.091

2.  Reply to H. Shojima et al.

Authors:  Kate Absolom; Lorraine Warrington; Eleanor Hudson; Jenny Hewison; Patricia Holch; Bryony Dawkins; Claire Hulme; Julia Brown; Galina Velikova
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 50.717

3.  'We do need to keep some human touch'-Patient and clinician experiences of ovarian cancer follow-up and the potential for an electronic patient-reported outcome pathway: A qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Fiona Kennedy; Leanne Shearsmith; Marie Holmes; Rosemary Peacock; Oana C Lindner; Molly Megson; Galina Velikova
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 2.328

4.  A real-time electronic symptom monitoring system for patients after discharge following surgery: a pilot study in cancer-related surgery.

Authors:  H S Richards; J M Blazeby; A Portal; R Harding; T Reed; T Lander; K A Chalmers; R Carter; R Singhal; K Absolom; G Velikova; K N L Avery
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Describing adverse events in Swiss hospitalized oncology patients using the Global Trigger Tool.

Authors:  Anne Gerber; André Da Silva Lopes; Natacha Szüts; Michael Simon; Viviane Ribordy-Baudat; Andreas Ebneter; Claire Perrinjaquet; Marie-Estelle Gaignard; Delphine Nicodet; Daniel Betticher; Grégoire Bula; Maxime Cote; Michel André Duchosal; Pierre-André Berret; Pierre-Yves Dietrich; Caitlin Brennan; Sandy Decosterd; Sandrina Ferreira Nobre; Solange Peters; Reto Koelliker; Françoise Ninane; Marie-Madlen Jeitziner; Sara Colomer-Lahiguera; Manuela Eicher
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-12

Review 6.  Patient-generated health data and electronic health record integration: a scoping review.

Authors:  Victoria L Tiase; William Hull; Mary M McFarland; Katherine A Sward; Guilherme Del Fiol; Catherine Staes; Charlene Weir; Mollie R Cummins
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2020-12-05

7.  Healthcare provider characteristics that influence the implementation of individual-level patient-centered outcome measure (PROM) and patient-reported experience measure (PREM) data across practice settings: a protocol for a mixed methods systematic review with a narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Angela C Wolff; Andrea Dresselhuis; Samar Hejazi; Duncan Dixon; Deborah Gibson; A Fuchsia Howard; Sarah Liva; Barbara Astle; Sheryl Reimer-Kirkham; Vanessa K Noonan; Lisa Edwards
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-09

Review 8.  Artificial intelligence empowered digital health technologies in cancer survivorship care: A scoping review.

Authors:  Lu-Chen Pan; Xiao-Ru Wu; Ying Lu; Han-Qing Zhang; Yao-Ling Zhou; Xue Liu; Sheng-Lin Liu; Qiao-Yuan Yan
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2022-08-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.