| Literature DB >> 33758790 |
Ruyu Liu1, Caitlyn G Edwards1, Corinne N Cannavale2, Isabel R Flemming3, Morgan R Chojnacki3, Ginger E Reeser3, Samantha J Iwinski4, Lisa M Renzi-Hammond5, Naiman A Khan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding is associated with healthier weight and nutrient status in early life. However, the impact of breastfeeding on carotenoid status beyond infancy, and the influence of adiposity, are unknown.Entities:
Keywords: adiposity; adolescents; body mass index; carotenoids; human milk; macular pigment; pediatric; reflection spectroscopy
Year: 2021 PMID: 33758790 PMCID: PMC7965082 DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzab010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Dev Nutr ISSN: 2475-2991
Participant demographics and characteristics
| Variables | Values |
|---|---|
| At school-age (age 7–12 y) | |
| Age, y | 9.4 ± 1.6 |
| Females | 39 (48) |
| Mother education | |
| High school graduate | 4 (4.9) |
| Some college | 10 (12.3) |
| Bachelor's degree | 34 (42.0) |
| Advanced degree | 33 (40.7) |
| Race | |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 (0) |
| Asian | 12 (14.8) |
| Black or African American | 5 (6.2) |
| Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander | 0 (0) |
| White or Caucasian | 55 (67.9) |
| Mixed or other | 9 (11.1) |
| Hispanic | 5 (6.2) |
| Household income, | |
| <40,000 | 16 (19.8) |
| 40,000–70,000 | 25 (30.9) |
| 70,000–100,000 | 18 (22.2) |
| >100,000 | 20 (24.7) |
| BMI-for-age percentile | 58.4 ± 29.0 |
| Underweight (<5th) | 4 (4.9) |
| Normal weight (≥5th and <85th) | 59 (72.8) |
| Overweight (≥85th and <95th) | 7 (8.6) |
| Obese (≥95th) | 11 (13.6) |
| Whole-body adiposity, % | 31.5 ± 6.8 |
| Visceral adipose tissue, g | 185.9 ± 94.2 |
| Total carotenoid intake, mg | 6.5 ± 3.9 |
| Lycopene, mg | 3.8 ± 3.0 |
| β-Carotene, mg | 1.5 ± 1.3 |
| Lutein and zeaxanthin, mg | 0.8 ± 0.7 |
| α-Carotene, mg | 0.3 ± 0.4 |
| β-Cryptoxanthin, mg | 0.08 ± 0.09 |
| Total energy intake, kcal | 1738.8 ± 435.3 |
| Skin carotenoid scores | 304.1 ± 100.7 |
| MPOD | 0.56 ± 0.2 |
| Retrospective response | |
| Total breastfeeding duration, mo | 12.9 ± 9.1 |
| Exclusive breastfeeding duration, mo | 4.8 ± 3.5 |
| Nonexclusive breastfeeding duration, mo | 8.2 ± 8.1 |
| Ever exclusively breastfed | 73 (90.1) |
| Exclusively formula-fed | 8 (9.9) |
| Birth-weight-for-gestational-age percentile | 59.7 ± 29.0 |
| Small (<10th) | 5 (6.2) |
| Normal (≥10th and ≤90th) | 60 (74.1) |
| Large (>90th) | 16 (19.8) |
1 n = 81. Values are n (%) or mean ± SD. MPOD, macular pigment optical density.
2Preferred not to answer, n = 2.
3 n = 71.
Bivariate correlations for relations between skin carotenoid scores, MPOD, BMI percentile, adiposity, breastfeeding, demographics, diet, weight-for-gestational-age percentile, mother education, and household income
| Variables | BMI percentile | %Fat | VAT | Skin carotenoids | MPOD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI percentile | — | 0.75** | 0.66** | −0.39** | −0.15 |
| %Fat | — | — | 0.55** | −0.40** | −0.11 |
| VAT | — | — | — | −0.39** | −0.01 |
| Skin carotenoids | — | — | — | — | 0.08 |
| Age | −0.06 | −0.07 | 0.28* | −0.07 | 0.26* |
| Sex | −0.04 | −0.38** | 0.27* | −0.09 | −0.02 |
| Mother education | 0.08 | 0.13 | −0.11 | −0.02 | −0.18 |
| Household income | 0.09 | 0.15 | −0.06 | −0.05 | −0.26* |
| Total breastfeeding duration | −0.24* | −0.17 | −0.24* | 0.14 | −0.04 |
| Exclusive breastfeeding duration | −0.21 | −0.17 | −0.22 | 0.21 | 0.02 |
| Nonexclusive breastfeeding duration | −0.18 | −0.11 | −0.17 | 0.06 | 0.04 |
| Total energy intake | −0.12 | −0.09 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.23 |
| Dietary carotenoids | −0.04 | −0.09 | −0.14 | 0.25* | 0.13 |
| Weight-for-gestational age-percentile | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.10 | −0.17 | 0.04 |
1MPOD, macular pigment optical density; VAT, visceral adipose tissue; %Fat, whole-body total fat percentage.
2 n = 71.
3 n = 79 (2 preferred not to answer).
*,**Significant correlation: *P < 0.05 (2-tailed); **P < 0.01 (2-tailed).
FIGURE 1Comparison of mean Veggie Meter scores between subjects split by median exclusive breastfeeding duration (5 mo).
FIGURE 2Results of mediation regression analyses for (A) BMI percentile and (B) VAT without covariates. VAT, visceral adipose tissue.
FIGURE 3Results of mediation regression analyses for (A) BMI percentile and (B) VAT adjusting for total energy intake, total carotenoid intake, and mother education. VAT, visceral adipose tissue.