Literature DB >> 33751686

Machine Learning Solutions for Osteoporosis-A Review.

Julien Smets1, Enisa Shevroja1, Thomas Hügle2, William D Leslie3, Didier Hans1.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis and its clinical consequence, bone fracture, is a multifactorial disease that has been the object of extensive research. Recent advances in machine learning (ML) have enabled the field of artificial intelligence (AI) to make impressive breakthroughs in complex data environments where human capacity to identify high-dimensional relationships is limited. The field of osteoporosis is one such domain, notwithstanding technical and clinical concerns regarding the application of ML methods. This qualitative review is intended to outline some of these concerns and to inform stakeholders interested in applying AI for improved management of osteoporosis. A systemic search in PubMed and Web of Science resulted in 89 studies for inclusion in the review. These covered one or more of four main areas in osteoporosis management: bone properties assessment (n = 13), osteoporosis classification (n = 34), fracture detection (n = 32), and risk prediction (n = 14). Reporting and methodological quality was determined by means of a 12-point checklist. In general, the studies were of moderate quality with a wide range (mode score 6, range 2 to 11). Major limitations were identified in a significant number of studies. Incomplete reporting, especially over model selection, inadequate splitting of data, and the low proportion of studies with external validation were among the most frequent problems. However, the use of images for opportunistic osteoporosis diagnosis or fracture detection emerged as a promising approach and one of the main contributions that ML could bring to the osteoporosis field. Efforts to develop ML-based models for identifying novel fracture risk factors and improving fracture prediction are additional promising lines of research. Some studies also offered insights into the potential for model-based decision-making. Finally, to avoid some of the common pitfalls, the use of standardized checklists in developing and sharing the results of ML models should be encouraged.
© 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). © 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; FRACTURE PREDICTION; MACHINE LEARNING; OSTEOPOROSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT

Year:  2021        PMID: 33751686     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  6 in total

Review 1.  Finite Element Assessment of Bone Fragility from Clinical Images.

Authors:  Enrico Schileo; Fulvia Taddei
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  One Novel Phantom-Less Quantitative Computed Tomography System for Auto-Diagnosis of Osteoporosis Utilizes Low-Dose Chest Computed Tomography Obtained for COVID-19 Screening.

Authors:  Tang Xiongfeng; Zhang Cheng; He Meng; Ma Chi; Guo Deming; Qi Huan; Chen Bo; Yang Kedi; Shen Xianyue; Wong Tak-Man; Lu William Weijia; Qin Yanguo
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-28

3.  Artificial Intelligence in Fracture Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rachel Y L Kuo; Conrad Harrison; Terry-Ann Curran; Benjamin Jones; Alexander Freethy; David Cussons; Max Stewart; Gary S Collins; Dominic Furniss
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 29.146

4.  Application of Machine Learning to Identify Clinically Meaningful Risk Group for Osteoporosis in Individuals Under the Recommended Age for Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.

Authors:  A Ram Hong; Yul Hwangbo; Hyun Woo Park; Hyojung Jung; Kyoung Yeon Back; Hyeon Ju Choi; Kwang Sun Ryu; Hyo Soung Cha; Eun Kyung Lee
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  A pilot study of a deep learning approach to detect marginal bone loss around implants.

Authors:  Min Liu; Shimin Wang; Hu Chen; Yunsong Liu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 6.  Interest of Bone Histomorphometry in Bone Pathophysiology Investigation: Foundation, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Pascale Chavassieux; Roland Chapurlat
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 6.055

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.