Literature DB >> 34195852

Application of Machine Learning to Identify Clinically Meaningful Risk Group for Osteoporosis in Individuals Under the Recommended Age for Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.

A Ram Hong1, Yul Hwangbo2, Hyun Woo Park3, Hyojung Jung3, Kyoung Yeon Back3, Hyeon Ju Choi3, Kwang Sun Ryu4, Hyo Soung Cha4, Eun Kyung Lee5.   

Abstract

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis; it is generally recommended in men ≥ 70 and women ≥ 65 years old. Therefore, assessment of clinical risk factors for osteoporosis is very important in individuals under the recommended age for DXA. Here, we examine the diagnostic performance of machine learning-based prediction models for osteoporosis in individuals under the recommended age for DXA examination. Data of 2210 men aged 50-69 and 1099 women aged 50-64 obtained from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey IV-V were analyzed. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) was used to find relevant clinical features and applied to three machine learning models: XGBoost, logistic regression, and a multilayer perceptron. For the prediction of osteoporosis, the XGBoost model using the top 20 features extracted from XGBoost showed the most reliable performance with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.73 and 0.79 in men and women, respectively. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of the Shapley additive explanation values based on a risk-score model obtained from XGBoost and conventional osteoporosis risk assessment tools for prediction of osteoporosis using optimal cut-off values for each model. We observed that a cut-off risk score of ≥ 28 in men and ≥ 47 in women was optimal to classify a positive screening for osteoporosis (an AUROC of 0.86 in men and 0.91 in women). The XGBoost-based osteoporosis-prediction model outperformed conventional risk assessment tools. Therefore, machine learning-based prediction models are a more suitable option than conventional risk assessment methods for screening osteoporosis in individuals under the recommended age for DXA examination.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone mineral density; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; Machine learning; Osteoporosis

Year:  2021        PMID: 34195852     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-021-00880-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  30 in total

1.  Prediction of osteoporotic hip fracture in postmenopausal women through patient-specific FE analyses and machine learning.

Authors:  E Villamor; C Monserrat; L Del Río; J A Romero-Martín; M J Rupérez
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Metabolic characteristics of subjects with spine-femur bone mineral density discordances: the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES 2008-2011).

Authors:  A Ram Hong; Jung Hee Kim; Ji Hyun Lee; Sang Wan Kim; Chan Soo Shin
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 3.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Predicting the Future - Big Data, Machine Learning, and Clinical Medicine.

Authors:  Ziad Obermeyer; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis.

Authors:  F Cosman; S J de Beur; M S LeBoff; E M Lewiecki; B Tanner; S Randall; R Lindsay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Artificial intelligence on the identification of risk groups for osteoporosis, a general review.

Authors:  Agnaldo S Cruz; Hertz C Lins; Ricardo V A Medeiros; José M F Filho; Sandro G da Silva
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  Can Classification and Regression Tree Analysis Help Identify Clinically Meaningful Risk Groups for Hip Fracture Prediction in Older American Men (The MrOS Cohort Study)?

Authors:  Yi Su; Timothy C Y Kwok; Steven R Cummings; Benjamin H K Yip; Peggy M Cawthon
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2019-08-21

8.  A Novel Fracture Prediction Model Using Machine Learning in a Community-Based Cohort.

Authors:  Sung Hye Kong; Daehwan Ahn; Buomsoo Raymond Kim; Karthik Srinivasan; Sudha Ram; Hana Kim; A Ram Hong; Jung Hee Kim; Nam H Cho; Chan Soo Shin
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2020-02-10

9.  Osteoporosis and Osteoporotic Fracture Fact Sheet in Korea.

Authors:  Seong Hee Ahn; Sang-Min Park; So Young Park; Jun-Il Yoo; Hyoung-Seok Jung; Jae-Hwi Nho; Se Hwa Kim; Young-Kyun Lee; Yong-Chan Ha; Sunmee Jang; Tae-Young Kim; Ha Young Kim
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2020-11-30

10.  Osteoporosis risk prediction for bone mineral density assessment of postmenopausal women using machine learning.

Authors:  Tae Keun Yoo; Sung Kean Kim; Deok Won Kim; Joon Yul Choi; Wan Hyung Lee; Ein Oh; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.