Yachao Liu1, Hongkai Yu2, Jiajin Liu1, Xiaojun Zhang1, Mu Lin3, Holger Schmidt4, Jiangping Gao2, Baixuan Xu1. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China. 2. Department of Urology Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China. 3. Magnetic Resonance Collaboration, Diagnostic Imaging, Siemens Healthineers Ltd., Shanghai, China. 4. Magnetic Resonance Education, Customer Services, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic performance of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) based 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT-ultrasound (PET/CT-US) or PET/MRI-ultrasound (PET/MRI-US) fusion targeted biopsy for intra-prostatic PET-positive lesions. METHODS: From April 2018 to November 2019, we prospectively enrolled 55 candidates to perform PET/CT-US or PET/MRI-US fusion targeted biopsies for solitary PET-positive prostate lesions (two to four cores/lesion). The positive rates of prostate cancer based on patients and biopsy cores were calculated respectively. With reference to the pathological results of biopsy cores, the MR signal characteristics in the area of the PET-positive lesion were analyzed for the patients who underwent PET/MRI. RESULTS: A total of 178 biopsy cores were taken on the 55 patients. One hundred forty-six biopsy cores (82.0%, 146/178) from 51 (92.7%, 51/55) patients were positive for prostate cancer; 47 (85.5%, 47/55) were clinically significant prostate cancer. It is noteworthy that nine patients underwent both 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT and PET/MRI examinations; the seven patients with prostate cancer showed abnormal MR signal in the area of the PET-positive lesion while the other two patients with prostatic hyperplasia and prostatitis showed normal MR signal in the area of the PET-positive lesion. CONCLUSION: This study indicated that 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT-US or PET/MRI-US fusion targeted prostate biopsies may be valuable for prostate cancer diagnosis and have a high detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer for PET-positive lesions. PET/MR can rule out some false PET-positive lesions, which may potentially reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic performance of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) based 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT-ultrasound (PET/CT-US) or PET/MRI-ultrasound (PET/MRI-US) fusion targeted biopsy for intra-prostatic PET-positive lesions. METHODS: From April 2018 to November 2019, we prospectively enrolled 55 candidates to perform PET/CT-US or PET/MRI-US fusion targeted biopsies for solitary PET-positive prostate lesions (two to four cores/lesion). The positive rates of prostate cancer based on patients and biopsy cores were calculated respectively. With reference to the pathological results of biopsy cores, the MR signal characteristics in the area of the PET-positive lesion were analyzed for the patients who underwent PET/MRI. RESULTS: A total of 178 biopsy cores were taken on the 55 patients. One hundred forty-six biopsy cores (82.0%, 146/178) from 51 (92.7%, 51/55) patients were positive for prostate cancer; 47 (85.5%, 47/55) were clinically significant prostate cancer. It is noteworthy that nine patients underwent both 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT and PET/MRI examinations; the seven patients with prostate cancer showed abnormal MR signal in the area of the PET-positive lesion while the other two patients with prostatic hyperplasia and prostatitis showed normal MR signal in the area of the PET-positive lesion. CONCLUSION: This study indicated that 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT-US or PET/MRI-US fusion targeted prostate biopsies may be valuable for prostate cancer diagnosis and have a high detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer for PET-positive lesions. PET/MR can rule out some false PET-positive lesions, which may potentially reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.
Authors: Vincenzo Scattoni; Andrea Russo; Ettore Di Trapani; Umberto Capitanio; Giovanni La Croce; Francesco Montorsi Journal: Arch Ital Urol Androl Date: 2014-12-30
Authors: Steven P Rowe; Kenneth L Gage; Sheila F Faraj; Katarzyna J Macura; Toby C Cornish; Nilda Gonzalez-Roibon; Gunes Guner; Enrico Munari; Alan W Partin; Christian P Pavlovich; Misop Han; H Ballentine Carter; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Amanda Blackford; Daniel Holt; Robert F Dannals; George J Netto; Martin A Lodge; Ronnie C Mease; Martin G Pomper; Steve Y Cho Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-06-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Stacy Loeb; Marc A Bjurlin; Joseph Nicholson; Teuvo L Tammela; David F Penson; H Ballentine Carter; Peter Carroll; Ruth Etzioni Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-01-09 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Glenn Bauman; Peter Martin; Jonathan D Thiessen; Reggie Taylor; Madeleine Moussa; Mena Gaed; Irina Rachinsky; Zahra Kassam; Joseph Chin; Stephen Pautler; Ting Yim Lee; John F Valliant; Aaron Ward Journal: Eur Urol Focus Date: 2016-10-26
Authors: Robert S Wang; Eric H Kim; Joel M Vetter; Kathryn J Fowler; Anup S Shetty; Aaron J Mintz; Niraj G Badhiwala; Robert L Grubb; Gerald L Andriole Journal: Urology Date: 2016-11-11 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Vidhush K Yarlagadda; Win Shun Lai; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Kristin K Porter; Jeffrey W Nix; John V Thomas; Soroush Rais-Bahrami Journal: Diagn Interv Radiol Date: 2018 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.630
Authors: Pietro Pepe; Marco Roscigno; Ludovica Pepe; Paolo Panella; Marinella Tamburo; Giulia Marletta; Francesco Savoca; Giuseppe Candiano; Sebastiano Cosentino; Massimo Ippolito; Andreas Tsirgiotis; Michele Pennisi Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-16 Impact factor: 4.964