Literature DB >> 26069305

¹⁸F-DCFBC PET/CT for PSMA-Based Detection and Characterization of Primary Prostate Cancer.

Steven P Rowe1, Kenneth L Gage1, Sheila F Faraj2, Katarzyna J Macura1,3,4, Toby C Cornish2, Nilda Gonzalez-Roibon2, Gunes Guner2, Enrico Munari2, Alan W Partin3, Christian P Pavlovich3, Misop Han3, H Ballentine Carter3, Trinity J Bivalacqua3, Amanda Blackford1, Daniel Holt1, Robert F Dannals1, George J Netto2,3,4, Martin A Lodge1, Ronnie C Mease1, Martin G Pomper1, Steve Y Cho1,4.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We previously demonstrated the ability to detect metastatic prostate cancer using N-[N-[(S)-1,3-dicarboxypropyl]carbamoyl]-4-(18)F-fluorobenzyl-L-cysteine ((18)F-DCFBC), a low-molecular-weight radiotracer that targets the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). PSMA has been shown to be associated with higher Gleason grade and more aggressive disease. An imaging biomarker able to detect clinically significant high-grade primary prostate cancer reliably would address an unmet clinical need by allowing for risk-adapted patient management.
METHODS: We enrolled 13 patients with primary prostate cancer who were imaged with (18)F-DCFBC PET before scheduled prostatectomy, with 12 of these patients also undergoing pelvic prostate MR imaging. Prostate (18)F-DCFBC PET was correlated with MR imaging and histologic and immunohistochemical analysis on a prostate-segment (12 regions) and dominant-lesion basis. There were no incidental extraprostatic findings on PET suggestive of metastatic disease.
RESULTS: MR imaging was more sensitive than (18)F-DCFBC PET for detection of primary prostate cancer on a per-segment (sensitivities of up to 0.17 and 0.39 for PET and MR imaging, respectively) and per-dominant-lesion analysis (sensitivities of 0.46 and 0.92 for PET and MR imaging, respectively). However, (18)F-DCFBC PET was more specific than MR imaging by per-segment analysis (specificities of 0.96 and 0.89 for PET and MR imaging for corresponding sensitivity, respectively) and specific for detection of high-grade lesions (Gleason 8 and 9) greater than 1.0 mL in size (4/4 of these patients positive by PET). (18)F-DCFBC uptake in tumors was positively correlated with Gleason score (ρ = 0.64; PSMA expression, ρ = 0.47; and prostate-specific antigen, ρ = 0.52). There was significantly lower (18)F-DCFBC uptake in benign prostatic hypertrophy than primary tumors (median maximum standardized uptake value, 2.2 vs. 3.5; P = 0.004).
CONCLUSION: Although the sensitivity of (18)F-DCFBC for primary prostate cancer was less than MR imaging, (18)F-DCFBC PET was able to detect the more clinically significant high-grade and larger-volume tumors (Gleason score 8 and 9) with higher specificity than MR imaging. In particular, there was relatively low (18)F-DCFBC PET uptake in benign prostatic hypertrophy lesions, compared with cancer in the prostate, which may allow for more specific detection of primary prostate cancer by (18)F-DCFBC PET. This study demonstrates the utility of PSMA-based PET, which may be used in conjunction with MR imaging to identify clinically significant prostate cancer.
© 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; PET/CT; primary prostate cancer; prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA); prostatectomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26069305      PMCID: PMC4659400          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.154336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  39 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Patrick C Walsh; Theodore L DeWeese; Mario A Eisenberger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Linda M Johnson; Baris Turkbey; William D Figg; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  Prevention and early detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jack Cuzick; Mangesh A Thorat; Gerald Andriole; Otis W Brawley; Powel H Brown; Zoran Culig; Rosalind A Eeles; Leslie G Ford; Freddie C Hamdy; Lars Holmberg; Dragan Ilic; Timothy J Key; Carlo La Vecchia; Hans Lilja; Michael Marberger; Frank L Meyskens; Lori M Minasian; Chris Parker; Howard L Parnes; Sven Perner; Harry Rittenhouse; Jack Schalken; Hans-Peter Schmid; Bernd J Schmitz-Dräger; Fritz H Schröder; Arnulf Stenzl; Bertrand Tombal; Timothy J Wilt; Alicja Wolk
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 4.  Advancements in MR imaging of the prostate: from diagnosis to interventions.

Authors:  David Bonekamp; Michael A Jacobs; Riham El-Khouli; Dan Stoianovici; Katarzyna J Macura
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is useless for the detection of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  C Hofer; C Laubenbacher; T Block; J Breul; R Hartung; M Schwaiger
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Use of step-section histopathology to evaluate 18F-fluorocholine PET sextant localization of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sandi A Kwee; Gregory P Thibault; Richard S Stack; Marc N Coel; Bungo Furusato; Isabell A Sesterhenn
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.488

7.  Localized prostate cancer detection with 18F FACBC PET/CT: comparison with MR imaging and histopathologic analysis.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Esther Mena; Joanna Shih; Peter A Pinto; Maria J Merino; Maria L Lindenberg; Marcelino Bernardo; Yolanda L McKinney; Stephen Adler; Rikard Owenius; Peter L Choyke; Karen A Kurdziel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Correlation of primary tumor prostate-specific membrane antigen expression with disease recurrence in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Ross; Christine E Sheehan; Hugh A G Fisher; Ronald P Kaufman; Prabhjot Kaur; Karen Gray; Iain Webb; Gary S Gray; Rebecca Mosher; Bhaskar V S Kallakury
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Expression of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in prostatic adenocarcinoma and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  C Marchal; M Redondo; M Padilla; J Caballero; I Rodrigo; J García; J Quian; D G Boswick
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 10.  Performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation and management of clinically low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Seyed Saeid Dianat; H Ballentine Carter; Katarzyna J Macura
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.498

View more
  75 in total

Review 1.  Multidisciplinary intervention of early, lethal metastatic prostate cancer: Report from the 2015 Coffey-Holden Prostate Cancer Academy Meeting.

Authors:  Andrea K Miyahira; Joshua M Lang; Robert B Den; Isla P Garraway; Tamara L Lotan; Ashley E Ross; Tanya Stoyanova; Steve Y Cho; Jonathan W Simons; Kenneth J Pienta; Howard R Soule
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.104

2.  [(18)F]Fluorobenzoyllysinepentanedioic Acid Carbamates: New Scaffolds for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA).

Authors:  Xing Yang; Ronnie C Mease; Mrudula Pullambhatla; Ala Lisok; Ying Chen; Catherine A Foss; Yuchuan Wang; Hassan Shallal; Hannah Edelman; Adam T Hoye; Giorgio Attardo; Sridhar Nimmagadda; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 3.  Molecular imaging-its current role in cancer.

Authors:  S McDermott; A Kilcoyne
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2015-08-07

4.  Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) with F-18-Labeled Compounds: the Influence of Prosthetic Groups on Tumor Uptake and Clearance Profile.

Authors:  Vincent Bouvet; Melinda Wuest; Justin J Bailey; Cody Bergman; Nancy Janzen; John F Valliant; Frank Wuest
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 5.  Current use of PSMA-PET in prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Tobias Maurer; Matthias Eiber; Markus Schwaiger; Jürgen E Gschwend
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Semiquantitative Parameters in PSMA-Targeted PET Imaging with 18F-DCFPyL: Variability in Normal-Organ Uptake.

Authors:  Xin Li; Steven P Rowe; Jeffrey P Leal; Michael A Gorin; Mohamad E Allaf; Ashley E Ross; Kenneth J Pienta; Martin A Lodge; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  New frontiers in prostate cancer imaging: clinical utility of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Asim Afaq; Deepak Batura; Jamshed Bomanji
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 8.  Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Radiohalogenated PET and Therapeutic Agents for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Steven P Rowe; Alexander Drzezga; Bernd Neumaier; Markus Dietlein; Michael A Gorin; Michael R Zalutsky; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 9.  The therapeutic and diagnostic potential of the prostate specific membrane antigen/glutamate carboxypeptidase II (PSMA/GCPII) in cancer and neurological disease.

Authors:  James C Evans; Meenakshi Malhotra; John F Cryan; Caitriona M O'Driscoll
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 8.739

10.  Comparison of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Based 18F-DCFBC PET/CT to Conventional Imaging Modalities for Detection of Hormone-Naïve and Castration-Resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Steven P Rowe; Katarzyna J Macura; Anthony Ciarallo; Esther Mena; Amanda Blackford; Rosa Nadal; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Mario A Eisenberger; Michael A Carducci; Ashley E Ross; Philip W Kantoff; Daniel P Holt; Robert F Dannals; Ronnie C Mease; Martin G Pomper; Steve Y Cho
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.