Literature DB >> 27845218

Determination of the Role of Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate in Clinical Practice: Is Biopsy Still Necessary?

Robert S Wang1, Eric H Kim1, Joel M Vetter1, Kathryn J Fowler2, Anup S Shetty2, Aaron J Mintz2, Niraj G Badhiwala1, Robert L Grubb1, Gerald L Andriole3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the negative predictive value (NPV) of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in routine clinical practice and to identify characteristics of patients for whom mpMRI fails to detect high-grade (Gleason score ≥7) disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed our prospectively maintained database of consecutive men who received prostate mpMRI at our institution, interpreted by a clinical practice of academic radiologists. Between January 2012 and December 2015, 84 men without any magnetic resonance imaging suspicious regions according to prior institutional classification, or with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 1-2 lesions according to the PI-RADS system, underwent standard template transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. Using these biopsy results, we calculated the NPV of mpMRI for the detection of PCa and identified patient risk factors for having a Gleason score ≥7 PCa on biopsy.
RESULTS: High-grade PCa (Gleason score ≥7) was found on TRUS biopsy in 10.3% of biopsy-naive patients (NPV=89.7%), 16.7% of patients with previous negative biopsy (NPV=83.3%), and 13.3% of patients on active surveillance (NPV=86.6%). On multivariate analysis, the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator (PCPTRC) estimated risk for high-grade PCa (as a continuous variable) was a significant predictor for high-grade PCa on biopsy (odds ratio 1.01, P < .01).
CONCLUSION: Men with negative mpMRIs interpreted in a routine clinical setting have a significant risk of harboring Gleason score ≥7 PCa on a standard 12-region template biopsy, independent of indication. Standard template TRUS prostate biopsy should still be recommended for patients with negative mpMRI, particularly those with elevated PCPTRC estimated risk of high-grade PCa.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27845218     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.10.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  8 in total

1.  How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Na Zeng; FengBo Zhang; YangXinRui Huang; Ye Tian
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  PI-RADS Steering Committee: The PI-RADS Multiparametric MRI and MRI-directed Biopsy Pathway.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Jelle Barentsz; Geert Villeirs; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Daniel J Margolis; Baris Turkbey; Harriet C Thoeny; François Cornud; Masoom A Haider; Katarzyna J Macura; Clare M Tempany; Sadhna Verma; Jeffrey C Weinreb
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  The role of mpMRI and PSA density in patients with an initial negative prostatic biopsy.

Authors:  Ahmed Fouad Kotb; Shelley Spaner; Trafford Crump; Matthew Eric Hyndman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Diagnostic Accuracy and Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Transperineal Targeted and Template Systematic Prostate Biopsy Based on Bi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Tae Il Noh; Jong Hyun Tae; Hyung Keun Kim; Ji Sung Shim; Sung Gu Kang; Deuk Jae Sung; Jun Cheon; Jeong Gu Lee; Seok Ho Kang
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.679

5.  Distribution of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score and diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy: comparison of an Asian and European cohort.

Authors:  Kai Zhang; Rui Chen; Arnout R Alberts; Gang Zhu; Yinghao Sun; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2018-10-22

6.  A Pilot Study of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT or PET/MRI and Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy for Intra-Prostatic PET-Positive Lesions.

Authors:  Yachao Liu; Hongkai Yu; Jiajin Liu; Xiaojun Zhang; Mu Lin; Holger Schmidt; Jiangping Gao; Baixuan Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Analysis of risk factors for determining the need for prostate biopsy in patients with negative MRI.

Authors:  Linghui Liang; Feng Qi; Yifei Cheng; Lei Zhang; Dongliang Cao; Gong Cheng; Lixin Hua
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Which Patients with Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Safely Avoid Biopsy for Prostate Cancer?

Authors:  Masakatsu Oishi; Toshitaka Shin; Chisato Ohe; Nima Nassiri; Suzanne L Palmer; Manju Aron; Akbar N Ashrafi; Giovanni E Cacciamani; Frank Chen; Vinay Duddalwar; Mariana C Stern; Osamu Ukimura; Inderbir S Gill; Andre Luis de Castro Abreu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 7.600

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.