Literature DB >> 33746558

PiSCES: Pi(scine) stream community estimation system.

Mike Cyterski1, Craig Barber1, Mike Galvin1, Rajbir Parmar1, John M Johnston1, Deron Smith2, Amber Ignatius3, Lourdes Prieto1, Kurt Wolfe1.   

Abstract

The Piscine Stream Community Estimation System (PiSCES) provides users with a hypothesized fish community for any stream reach in the conterminous United States using information obtained from Nature Serve, the US Geological Survey (USGS), StreamCat, and the Peterson Field Guide to Freshwater Fishes of North America for over 1000 native and non-native freshwater fish species. PiSCES can filter HUC8-based fish assemblages based on species-specific occurrence models; create a community abundance/biomass distribution by relating relative abundance to mean body weight of each species; and allow users to query its database to see ancillary characteristics of each species (e.g., habitat preferences and maximum size). Future efforts will aim to improve the accuracy of the species distribution database and refine/augment increase the occurrence models. The PiSCES tool is accessible at the EPA's Quantitative Environmental Domain (QED) website at https://qed.epacdx.net/pisces/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community size spectra; Community structure; Fish distributions

Year:  2020        PMID: 33746558      PMCID: PMC7970533          DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Model Softw        ISSN: 1364-8152            Impact factor:   5.288


  13 in total

1.  A common rule for the scaling of carnivore density.

Authors:  Chris Carbone; John L Gittleman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-03-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Effects of body size and temperature on population growth.

Authors:  Van M Savage; James F Gilloly; James H Brown; Eric L Charnov
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Using multispecies occupancy models to improve the characterization and understanding of metacommunity structure.

Authors:  Joseph R Mihaljevic; Maxwell B Joseph; Pieter T J Johnson
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition.

Authors:  John L Stoddard; David P Larsen; Charles P Hawkins; Richard K Johnson; Richard H Norris
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.657

Review 5.  Relationships between body size and abundance in ecology.

Authors:  Ethan P White; S K Morgan Ernest; Andrew J Kerkhoff; Brian J Enquist
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Predicting the biological condition of streams: use of geospatial indicators of natural and anthropogenic characteristics of watersheds.

Authors:  Daren M Carlisle; James Falcone; Michael R Meador
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Forecasting fish biomasses, densities, productions, and bioaccumulation potentials of mid-atlantic wadeable streams.

Authors:  M Craig Barber; Brenda Rashleigh; Michael J Cyterski
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 2.992

8.  Mapping watershed integrity for the conterminous United States.

Authors:  Darren J Thornbrugh; Scott G Leibowitz; Ryan A Hill; Marc H Weber; Zachary C Johnson; Anthony R Olsen; Joseph E Flotemersch; John L Stoddard; David V Peck
Journal:  Ecol Indic       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.958

9.  Predictive mapping of the biotic condition of conterminous U.S. rivers and streams.

Authors:  Ryan A Hill; Eric W Fox; Scott G Leibowitz; Anthony R Olsen; Darren J Thornbrugh; Marc H Weber
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 4.657

10.  Assessing the biological status of fish in a river receiving pulp and paper mill effluents.

Authors:  T G Kovacs; R H Voss
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 8.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.