Literature DB >> 18493861

Predicting the biological condition of streams: use of geospatial indicators of natural and anthropogenic characteristics of watersheds.

Daren M Carlisle1, James Falcone, Michael R Meador.   

Abstract

We developed and evaluated empirical models to predict biological condition of wadeable streams in a large portion of the eastern USA, with the ultimate goal of prediction for unsampled basins. Previous work had classified (i.e., altered vs. unaltered) the biological condition of 920 streams based on a biological assessment of macroinvertebrate assemblages. Predictor variables were limited to widely available geospatial data, which included land cover, topography, climate, soils, societal infrastructure, and potential hydrologic modification. We compared the accuracy of predictions of biological condition class based on models with continuous and binary responses. We also evaluated the relative importance of specific groups and individual predictor variables, as well as the relationships between the most important predictors and biological condition. Prediction accuracy and the relative importance of predictor variables were different for two subregions for which models were created. Predictive accuracy in the highlands region improved by including predictors that represented both natural and human activities. Riparian land cover and road-stream intersections were the most important predictors. In contrast, predictive accuracy in the lowlands region was best for models limited to predictors representing natural factors, including basin topography and soil properties. Partial dependence plots revealed complex and nonlinear relationships between specific predictors and the probability of biological alteration. We demonstrate a potential application of the model by predicting biological condition in 552 unsampled basins across an ecoregion in southeastern Wisconsin (USA). Estimates of the likelihood of biological condition of unsampled streams could be a valuable tool for screening large numbers of basins to focus targeted monitoring of potentially unaltered or altered stream segments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18493861     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-008-0256-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  8 in total

1.  Random forest: a classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling.

Authors:  Vladimir Svetnik; Andy Liaw; Christopher Tong; J Christopher Culberson; Robert P Sheridan; Bradley P Feuston
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

2.  Using environmental stressor information to predict the ecological status of Maryland non-tidal streams as measured by biological indicators.

Authors:  J H Vølstad; N E Roth; G Mercurio; M T Southerland; D E Strebel
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  A watershed-scale model for predicting nonpoint pollution risk in North Carolina.

Authors:  Kevin M Potter; Frederick W Cubbage; Gary B Blank; Rex H Schaberg
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  The stream and its altered valley: integrating landscape ecology into environmental assessments of agro-ecosystems.

Authors:  Adam G Yates; Robert C Bailey
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Quantifying biological integrity by taxonomic completeness: its utility in regional and global assessments.

Authors:  Charles P Hawkins
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  The biological condition gradient: a descriptive model for interpreting change in aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Susan P Davies; Susan K Jackson
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.657

7.  Random forests for classification in ecology.

Authors:  D Richard Cutler; Thomas C Edwards; Karen H Beard; Adele Cutler; Kyle T Hess; Jacob Gibson; Joshua J Lawler
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.499

8.  Importance of riparian forests in urban catchments contingent on sediment and hydrologic regimes.

Authors:  Allison H Roy; Mary C Freeman; Byron J Freeman; Seth J Wenger; William E Ensign; Judith L Meyer
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.266

  8 in total
  12 in total

1.  Importance of Natural and Anthropogenic Environmental Factors to Fish Communities of the Fox River in Illinois.

Authors:  Spencer Schnier; Ximing Cai; Yong Cao
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Assessing the accuracy and stability of variable selection methods for random forest modeling in ecology.

Authors:  Eric W Fox; Ryan A Hill; Scott G Leibowitz; Anthony R Olsen; Darren J Thornbrugh; Marc H Weber
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  The Lake-Catchment (LakeCat) Dataset: characterizing landscape features for lake basins within the conterminous USA.

Authors:  Ryan A Hill; Marc H Weber; Rick M Debbout; Scott G Leibowitz; Anthony R Olsen
Journal:  Freshw Sci       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.034

4.  Comparing spatial regression to random forests for large environmental data sets.

Authors:  Eric W Fox; Jay M Ver Hoef; Anthony R Olsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Predictive mapping of the biotic condition of conterminous U.S. rivers and streams.

Authors:  Ryan A Hill; Eric W Fox; Scott G Leibowitz; Anthony R Olsen; Darren J Thornbrugh; Marc H Weber
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Patterns and predictions of drinking water nitrate violations across the conterminous United States.

Authors:  Michael J Pennino; Scott G Leibowitz; Jana E Compton; Ryan A Hill; Robert D Sabo
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Spatial Convergence in Major Dissolved Ion Concentrations and Implications of Headwater Mining for Downstream Water Quality.

Authors:  Brent Johnson; Elizabeth Smith; Jerry W Ackerman; Sue Dye; Robyn Polinsky; Eric Somerville; Chris Decker; Derek Little; Gregory Pond; Ellen D'Amico
Journal:  J Am Water Resour Assoc       Date:  2019-02-01

8.  Stream macroinvertebrate response models for bioassessment metrics: addressing the issue of spatial scale.

Authors:  Ian R Waite; Jonathan G Kennen; Jason T May; Larry R Brown; Thomas F Cuffney; Kimberly A Jones; James L Orlando
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Correspondence of biological condition models of California streams at statewide and regional scales.

Authors:  Jason T May; Larry R Brown; Andrew C Rehn; Ian R Waite; Peter R Ode; Raphael D Mazor; Kenneth C Schiff
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 2.513

10.  Evaluating the Relationships between Riparian Land Cover Characteristics and Biological Integrity of Streams Using Random Forest Algorithms.

Authors:  Se-Rin Park; Suyeon Kim; Sang-Woo Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.