Literature DB >> 11910114

A common rule for the scaling of carnivore density.

Chris Carbone1, John L Gittleman.   

Abstract

Population density in plants and animals is thought to scale with size as a result of mass-related energy requirements. Variation in resources, however, naturally limits population density and may alter expected scaling patterns. We develop and test a general model for variation within and between species in population density across the order Carnivora. We find that 10,000 kilograms of prey supports about 90 kilograms of a given species of carnivore, irrespective of body mass, and that the ratio of carnivore number to prey biomass scales to the reciprocal of carnivore mass. Using mass-specific equations of prey productivity, we show that carnivore number per unit prey productivity scales to carnivore mass near -0.75, and that the scaling rule can predict population density across more than three orders of magnitude. The relationship provides a basis for identifying declining carnivore species that require conservation measures.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11910114     DOI: 10.1126/science.1067994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  70 in total

1.  Ecological community description using the food web, species abundance, and body size.

Authors:  Joel E Cohen; Tomas Jonsson; Stephen R Carpenter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The bigger they come, the harder they fall: body size and prey abundance influence predator-prey ratios.

Authors:  Chris Carbone; Nathalie Pettorelli; Philip A Stephens
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Scaling rules for the final decline to extinction.

Authors:  Blaine D Griffen; John M Drake
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Taxonomic variation in size-density relationships challenges the notion of energy equivalence.

Authors:  Nick J B Isaac; David Storch; Chris Carbone
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Competition and coexistence in a small carnivore guild.

Authors:  Jacques de Satgé; Kristine Teichman; Bogdan Cristescu
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Salmon subsidize an escape from a size spectrum.

Authors:  Morgan D Hocking; Nicholas K Dulvy; John D Reynolds; Richard A Ring; Thomas E Reimchen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Evolution in coyotes (Canis latrans) in response to the megafaunal extinctions.

Authors:  Julie A Meachen; Joshua X Samuels
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A microraptorine (Dinosauria-Dromaeosauridae) from the Late Cretaceous of North America.

Authors:  Nicholas R Longrich; Philip J Currie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A community-level evaluation of the impact of prey behavioural and ecological characteristics on predator diet composition.

Authors:  Susanne Shultz; Ronald Noë; W Scott McGraw; R I M Dunbar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Integrating economic costs and biological traits into global conservation priorities for carnivores.

Authors:  Rafael Dias Loyola; Luiz Gustavo Rodrigues Oliveira-Santos; Mário Almeida-Neto; Denise Martins Nogueira; Umberto Kubota; José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho; Thomas Michael Lewinsohn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.