Literature DB >> 33746508

Screening for Barrett's Oesophagus: Are We Ready for it?

Aisha Yusuf1, Rebecca C Fitzgerald1.   

Abstract

Purpose of review: The targeted approach adopted for Barrett's oesophagus (BO) screening is sub-optimal considering the large proportion of BO cases that are currently missed. We reviewed the literature highlighting recent technological advancements in efforts to counteract this challenge. We also provided insights into strategies that can improve the outcomes from current BO screening practises. Recent findings: The standard method for BO detection, endoscopy, is invasive and expensive and therefore inappropriate for mass screening. On the other hand, endoscopy is more cost-effective for screening a high-risk population. A consensus has however not been reached on who should be screened. Risk prediction algorithms have been tested as an enrichment pre-screening tool reporting modest AUC's but require more prospective evaluation studies. Less invasive endoscopy methods like trans-nasal endoscopy, oesophageal capsule endsocopy and non-endoscopic cell collection devices like the Cytosponge coupled with biomarker analysis have shown promise in BO detection with randomised clinical trial evidence. Summary: A three-tier precision cancer programme whereby risk prediction algorithms and non-endoscopic minimally invasive cell collection devices are used to triage test a wider pool of individuals may improve the detection rate of current screening practises with minimal cost implications. © Crown 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrett’s oeosphagus; Cytopsonge; Early detection of cancer; Endoscopy; Oesophageal adenocarcinoma; Screening

Year:  2021        PMID: 33746508      PMCID: PMC7962426          DOI: 10.1007/s11938-021-00342-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1092-8472


  74 in total

1.  Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or cardia.

Authors:  Amitabh Chak; Ashley Faulx; Charis Eng; William Grady; Margaret Kinnard; Heather Ochs-Balcom; Gary Falk
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Safety and Acceptability of Esophageal Cytosponge Cell Collection Device in a Pooled Analysis of Data From Individual Patients.

Authors:  Wladyslaw Januszewicz; Wei Keith Tan; Katie Lehovsky; Irene Debiram-Beecham; Tara Nuckcheddy; Susan Moist; Sudarshan Kadri; Massimiliano di Pietro; Alex Boussioutas; Nicholas J Shaheen; David A Katzka; Evan S Dellon; Rebecca C Fitzgerald
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Surveillance of Barrett's esophagus and mortality from esophageal adenocarcinoma: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Romy E Verbeek; Max Leenders; Fiebo J W Ten Kate; Richard van Hillegersberg; Frank P Vleggaar; Jantine W P M van Baal; Martijn G H van Oijen; Peter D Siersema
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Endoscopic surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus: the patients' perspective.

Authors:  Sheldon C Cooper; Amul El-agib; Sadaf Dar; Imtiyaz Mohammed; Peter Nightingale; Iain A Murray; Brian T Cooper; Nigel J Trudgill
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.566

5.  Unsedated transnasal endoscopy: a Canadian experience in daily practice.

Authors:  S Cho; N Arya; K Swan; M Cirocco; G Kandel; P Kortan; N Marcon
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.522

6.  ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Nicholas J Shaheen; Gary W Falk; Prasad G Iyer; Lauren B Gerson
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Accuracy and Methodologic Challenges of Volatile Organic Compound-Based Exhaled Breath Tests for Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  George B Hanna; Piers R Boshier; Sheraz R Markar; Andrea Romano
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 31.777

8.  Acceptability and accuracy of a non-endoscopic screening test for Barrett's oesophagus in primary care: cohort study.

Authors:  Sudarshan R Kadri; Pierre Lao-Sirieix; Maria O'Donovan; Irene Debiram; Madhumita Das; Jane M Blazeby; Jon Emery; Alex Boussioutas; Helen Morris; Fiona M Walter; Paul Pharoah; Richard H Hardwick; Rebecca C Fitzgerald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-09-10

9.  Methylation panel is a diagnostic biomarker for Barrett's oesophagus in endoscopic biopsies and non-endoscopic cytology specimens.

Authors:  Hamza Chettouh; Oliver Mowforth; Núria Galeano-Dalmau; Navya Bezawada; Caryn Ross-Innes; Shona MacRae; Irene Debiram-Beecham; Maria O'Donovan; Rebecca C Fitzgerald
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Analysis of tissue and circulating microRNA expression during metaplastic transformation of the esophagus.

Authors:  Daniela Cabibi; Stefano Caruso; Viviana Bazan; Marta Castiglia; Giuseppe Bronte; Sabrina Ingrao; Daniele Fanale; Antonina Cangemi; Valentina Calò; Angela Listì; Lorena Incorvaia; Antonio Galvano; Gianni Pantuso; Eugenio Fiorentino; Sergio Castorina; Antonio Russo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-07-26
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Expanding beyond endoscopy: A review of non-invasive modalities in Barrett's esophagus screening and surveillance.

Authors:  Dariush Shahsavari; Praneeth Kudaravalli; John Erikson L Yap; Kenneth J Vega
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 5.374

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.