Literature DB >> 19598328

Endoscopic surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus: the patients' perspective.

Sheldon C Cooper1, Amul El-agib, Sadaf Dar, Imtiyaz Mohammed, Peter Nightingale, Iain A Murray, Brian T Cooper, Nigel J Trudgill.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Barrett's oesophagus (BO) is associated with the development of oesophageal adenocarcinoma and endoscopic surveillance is commonly practised. In view of the clinical, psychological and economic implications of BO, we have studied patients' attitudes towards surveillance, their levels of anxiety and quality of life.
METHODS: Patients with BO undergoing endoscopic surveillance were asked to complete a questionnaire,including seven questions on their experience of surveillance, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale,the Trust in Physician Scale (TIPS) and the Short Form-36 quality of life questionnaire.
RESULTS: Of the 250 patients invited, 178 responded (71%).One hundred and fifty-one (60%) completed the questionnaire sufficiently for analysis [median age 66 (range 41-79) years, 101 male]. Twenty-nine percent of patients had received too little information concerning surveillance of BO and 22% no information at all. Information was deemed difficult to understand by 24%. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale anxiety score: 14%abnormal, 25% borderline. Quality of life was lower than the general population in seven of eight Short Form-36 parameters. Increasing TIPS score correlated with having received (r= 0.33, P <0.001) and understood (r = 0.2, P= 0.037) BO information, and negatively with the belief that endoscopic surveillance reduced oesophageal adenocarcinoma risk (r= - 0.19, P =0.025). Increasing TIPS score was associated with less anxiety (P= 0.015) and depression (P =0.001), and better quality of life.
CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing endoscopic surveillance for BO suffer anxiety and have impaired quality of life. As trust in their physicians is correlated with receiving sufficient BO information, we surmise that ensuring BO patients understand their condition is likely to improve quality of life, anxiety and depression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19598328     DOI: 10.1097/meg.0b013e328318ed2d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  10 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and Surveillance of Barrett's Esophagus: Addressing the Transatlantic Divide.

Authors:  Saad Ghaus; Helmut Neumann; Humayun Muhammad; Gian Eugenio Tontini; Sauid Ishaq
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Point-Counterpoint: Screening and Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus, Is It Worthwhile?

Authors:  Fouad Otaki; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Understanding Barrett's columnar lined oesophagus from the patients' perspective: qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews with patients.

Authors:  Helen Griffiths; Ruth Davies
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-03-29

Review 4.  Patients' intuitive judgments about surveillance endoscopy in Barrett's esophagus: a review and application to models of decision-making.

Authors:  M Hinojosa-Lindsey; J Arney; S Heberlig; J R Kramer; R L Street; H B El-Serag; A D Naik
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 5.  Monitoring the premalignant potential of Barrett's oesophagus'.

Authors:  David Graham; Gideon Lipman; Vinay Sehgal; Laurence B Lovat
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-05

Review 6.  Screening for Barrett's Oesophagus: Are We Ready for it?

Authors:  Aisha Yusuf; Rebecca C Fitzgerald
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-03-16

Review 7.  How are we measuring health-related quality of life in patients with a Barrett Esophagus? A systematic review on patient-reported outcome measurements.

Authors:  Mirjam C M van der Ende-van Loon; A Stoker; P T Nieuwkerk; W L Curvers; E J Schoon
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.440

8.  Barrett Esophagus: Quality of life and factors associated with illness perception.

Authors:  Mirjam C M van der Ende-van Loon; Pythia T Nieuwkerk; Stephan H C van Stiphout; Robert C H Scheffer; Rogier J J de Ridder; Roos E Pouw; Alaa Alkhalaf; Bas L A M Weusten; Wouter L Curvers; Erik J Schoon
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 6.866

9.  Patient-centered, comparative effectiveness of esophageal cancer screening: protocol for a comparative effectiveness research study to inform guidelines for evidence-based approach to screening and surveillance endoscopy.

Authors:  Jennifer R Kramer; Jennifer Arney; John Chen; Peter Richardson; Zhigang Duan; Richard L Street; Marilyn Hinojosa-Lindsey; Aanand D Naik; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Comparative quantitative survey of patient experience in Barrett's oesophagus and other gastrointestinal disorders.

Authors:  James Britton; Paraskevi Taxiarchi; Glen Martin; Robert Willert; Maria Horne; Shaheen Hamdy; John McLaughlin; Yeng Ang
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-03-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.