Jiawei Zhao1, Meleha Ahmad1, Emily W Gower2, Roxana Fu3, Fasika A Woreta1, Shannath L Merbs4. 1. Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 2. Gillings School of Global Public Health and Department of Ophthalmology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 4. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 419 W. Redwood St., Suite 420, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. smerbs@som.umaryland.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Repair of margin-involving eyelid lacerations is a challenge for beginning ophthalmology residents, yet no commercially-available simulation models exist for learning this skill. The objective of the study was to modify a mannequin-based surgical simulator originally developed for trachomatous trichiasis surgery training to teach margin-involving eyelid laceration repair and to evaluate its success within a residency wet-lab environment. METHODS: We modified a previously developed mannequin-based training system for trachomatous trichiasis surgery into a simulator for margin-involving eyelid laceration repair. Six ophthalmology residents from a tertiary care academic institution performed at least one simulated margin-involving eyelid laceration repair using the surgical simulator between September 2019 and March 2020. Each session was video recorded. Two oculoplastic surgeons reviewed the videos in a blinded fashion to assess surgical proficiency using a standardized grading system. Participants were surveyed on their comfort level with eyelid laceration repair pre- and post-completion of simulation. They were also queried on their perceived usefulness of the surgical simulator compared to past methods and experiences. RESULTS: Six residents completed 11 simulation surgeries. For three residents who completed more than one session, a slight increase in their skills assessment score and a decrease in operative time over two to three simulation sessions were found. Self-reported comfort level with margin-involving eyelid laceration repairs was significantly higher post-simulation compared to pre-simulation (p = 0.02). Residents ranked the usefulness of our surgical simulator higher than past methods such as fruit peels, surgical skill boards, gloves, and pig feet (p = 0.03) but lower than operating room experience (p = 0.02). Residents perceived the surgical simulator to be as useful as cadaver head and emergency department/consult experience. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a surgical simulator for teaching eyelid laceration repair and showed its utility in developing trainees' surgical skills. Our surgical simulator was rated to be as useful as a cadaver head but is more readily available and cost effective.
BACKGROUND: Repair of margin-involving eyelid lacerations is a challenge for beginning ophthalmology residents, yet no commercially-available simulation models exist for learning this skill. The objective of the study was to modify a mannequin-based surgical simulator originally developed for trachomatous trichiasis surgery training to teach margin-involving eyelid laceration repair and to evaluate its success within a residency wet-lab environment. METHODS: We modified a previously developed mannequin-based training system for trachomatous trichiasis surgery into a simulator for margin-involving eyelid laceration repair. Six ophthalmology residents from a tertiary care academic institution performed at least one simulated margin-involving eyelid laceration repair using the surgical simulator between September 2019 and March 2020. Each session was video recorded. Two oculoplastic surgeons reviewed the videos in a blinded fashion to assess surgical proficiency using a standardized grading system. Participants were surveyed on their comfort level with eyelid laceration repair pre- and post-completion of simulation. They were also queried on their perceived usefulness of the surgical simulator compared to past methods and experiences. RESULTS: Six residents completed 11 simulation surgeries. For three residents who completed more than one session, a slight increase in their skills assessment score and a decrease in operative time over two to three simulation sessions were found. Self-reported comfort level with margin-involving eyelid laceration repairs was significantly higher post-simulation compared to pre-simulation (p = 0.02). Residents ranked the usefulness of our surgical simulator higher than past methods such as fruit peels, surgical skill boards, gloves, and pig feet (p = 0.03) but lower than operating room experience (p = 0.02). Residents perceived the surgical simulator to be as useful as cadaver head and emergency department/consult experience. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a surgical simulator for teaching eyelid laceration repair and showed its utility in developing trainees' surgical skills. Our surgical simulator was rated to be as useful as a cadaver head but is more readily available and cost effective.
Authors: Jeffrey A Tabas; Jon Rosenson; Daniel D Price; Dana Rohde; Carina H Baird; Nripendra Dhillon Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Taylor R Pollei; David M Barrs; Michael L Hinni; Stephen F Bansberg; Logan C Walter Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Ann Sofia S Thomsen; Yousif Subhi; Jens Folke Kiilgaard; Morten la Cour; Lars Konge Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-04-10 Impact factor: 12.079