Comparing sequential vs day 3 vs day 5 embryo transfers in cases with recurrent implantation failure: randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The recent improvement in sequential media has refocused its attention on the role of human blastocysts in ART, not only because of its advantages but also because of the possible cancellation of embryo transfer when relying on blastocyst transfer only. Hence, the idea of sequential transfer on day 3 and day 5 was proposed. Objective: To compare the pregnancy outcomes of sequential embryo transfer on day 3 and day 5, versus cleavage transfer on day 3 and blastocyst transfer on day 5 in cases of recurrent implantation failure.
METHODS: This was a prospective and randomized trial, in which 210 qualified patients with recurrent implantation failures undergoing IVF/ICSI were randomized into three groups, each group included 70 patients. Embryo transfer was performed in day 3 in the first group, day 5 (blastocyst transfer) in the second group and sequential embryo transfer in days 3 and 5 in the third group. We assessed pregnancy outcomes from all the three groups.
Results: Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were significantly higher in the sequential group than either group day-3 or day-5 of embryo transfer in cases with recurrent implantation failures.
CONCLUSIONS: Sequential embryo transfer in cases with recurrent implantation failures and adequate number of retrieved oocytes is associated with higher implantation and clinical pregnancy rates, and it is advocated for patients having an adequate number of good quality embryos.

INTRODUCTION

Implantation has two essential components, a healthy embryo that has a high potential for implantation, and an endometrium favoring embryo implantation. The interaction between these two components leads to apposition, attachment and invasion by the embryo, which are the corner-stone steps for successful implantations, and normal placentation later (Simon & Laufer, 2012).

In the past, blastocyst transfers were challenging due to difficulties in maintaining the human embryo in culture for more than forty-eight hours; thus, we used cleavage-stage transfers. Advocates of cleavage stage transfers believe that the human womb is the best incubator, and prolonged embryo culture for 5-6 days may affect its in-vivo viability; in addition, the possibility of transfer cancellation due to failure of embryo progression to the blastocyst stage (Marek ), which represents negative emotional, legal, financial, and psychological impacts on both the couple and the ART center. Moreover, reduced number of frozen embryos available for future transfer could be the reason why a Cochrane meta-analysis found lower cumulative pregnancy rates with blastocyst transfers, when compared with cleavage stage transfers (Glujovsky ).

Recent improvements in culture techniques, including the use of sequential media, has enabled the extension of embryo growth in vitro (Gardner ), drawing the attention to the advantages of blastocyst transfer in IVF. In addition, post compaction embryos transferred are more tolerant to a wider range of environments than pre-compaction embryos, because the latter are exposed to higher concentrations of amino acids (Iritani ; Miller & Schultz, 1987) and carbohydrates (Gardner ), which is not the regular exposure. Thus, cleavage stage embryo transfer exposes the embryo to a lot of stress, compromising both its implantation and viability potentials. Ovarian hyperstimulation also negatively affects the uterine milieu (Simon ), minimizing the period of embryo exposure to such altered environment is recommended, which is the case in blastocyst transfers. Furthermore, with cleavage stage transfer, maternal transcripts and stored mRNA, exclusively originating from oocyte, direct the development of the embryo, because the embryonic genome remains latent at that time (Hayrinen ). Additional studies have proved that uterine contractions progressively diminish as one moves farther into the luteal phase; and thus, early embryo transfer to the uterus may cause its loss because of increased uterine contractions. In addition, recent improvement of embryo culture allowed possible production of higher numbers of human blastocyst, which can subsequently implant at higher rates than cleavage stage embryo (Nadkarni ; Bulletti ). Blastocyst transfer resembles the natural cycle as the embryo normally arrives inside the uterine cavity from the fallopian tube at the blastocyst stage. Blastocyst transfers also bear better embryo euploidy status than cleavage stage transfers (Dalal ). Blastocyst cultures yield better results in pre-implantation genetic testing for monogenic gene defects (PGT-M), or pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). Accordingly, many authorities have recommended adopting the policy of “pure” blastocyst transfer, rather than cleavage transfer (Dalal ). We know that blastocyst transfers are superior to cleavage stage embryo transfers, vis-à-vis the implantation potential, as the probability of synchronized endometrial receptivity and embryonic development rises, leading to a rise in the implantation rate, which is the determining factor in IVF success (although live birth rate is considered the gold standard). Blastocyst transfers enable better selection of high-quality embryos for implantation, since the activation of the embryonic genome occurs around day 3; therefore, blastocyst transfers ensure that only those embryos, which have undergone the genomic shift, are selected for transfer. Thus, enabling the clinician to naturally select competent embryos that have the potential of normal implantation and development (Braude ). Therefore, in vitro culturing of embryos in the blastocyst stage will achieve two goals, which are better selection of higher quality embryos for transfer, and promoting better physiologic endometrial receptivity and capability of achieving the ‘‘implantation window’’ (Simon & Laufer, 2012).

Recurrent implantation failure is one of the problems affecting couples undergoing IVF/ICSI, which has no standard definition; however, Polanski did a systemic review on this condition and concluded that the definition of recurrent implantation failure is absent implantation after two consecutive frozen embryo replacements, or IVF/ICSI cycles with a cumulative number of at least four cleavage stage embryos and two blastocysts, with all embryos being of appropriate developmental stage and good quality. To avoid these unwanted sequelae, “sequential” embryo transfer, in which both, cleavage stage embryo(s) on day 3 and blastocyst(s) on day 5, are sequentially transferred in the same cycle, has been proposed. Sequential transfers have the theoretical advantage of day-5 and day-3 transfers, and a lower likelihood of transfer cancellation (Goto ). However, the efficacy of such technique (sequential transfer) is still debatable (Phillips ; Levron ) (Blake ), and limited data have been published in this subject. Earlier studies showed a rise in pregnancy rates following sequential embryo transfer (Abramovici ) while, later studies found non-significant differences in pregnancy rates between single and double embryo transfers (Al-Hasani ; Ashkenazi ).

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of sequential embryo transfers comparing days 3 (cleavage stage) and 5 (blastocyst) embryo transfer in cases of recurrent implantation failures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient selection

This is a prospective randomized trial carried out in the assisted reproductive therapy (ART) centers in the Air Force Specialized Hospital (Cairo, Egypt) and Al-Azhar University Hospital (Cairo, Egypt) between April 2015 and June 2017. The Ethics Committee of the Air-Force specialized Hospital approved the study. The study was registered in the Pan-African Clinical Trial Registry PACTR201709002592834. A total of 245 women scheduled for IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were approached to be recruited into the study, and were given the required information, and 26 women declined to participate. Five women did not meet the inclusion criteria upon the simulation onset, and four cases had less than five embryos; hence, nine cases were excluded from the study prior to randomization. Cases fulfilling the inclusion criteria were randomized after oocyte retrieval and post-fertilization check (Figure 1 and 2). The randomization was done according to a computer-generated list. The nurse coordinator ran the computer-generated list without any interference from the investigators. Two hundred and ten women were allocated to the conventional transfer (day-3) group, the blastocyst transfer (day-5) group or the sequential transfer (day-3 and day-5) group. Each group included 70 women. Six patients dropped out during follow up after embryo transfer 2 in the day-3 group, 3 in the day-5 group and 1 in the sequential group. Ethical approvals were granted for the study from the local Ethics Committee before enrollment, and all the patients signed an informed consent form. The trial was registered in the Pan-African Clinical Trial Registry. The inclusion criteria were: age ≤ 35 years, recurrent (2 or more) implantation failures as defined by Polanski ; hysteroscopically normal endometrial cavity; negative thrombophilia screening (congenital thrombophilia screen, lupus anti-coagulant and anti-cardiolipin IgG & IgM); absence of hydrosalpinx and endometriosis (excluded by laparoscopy); a day-3 follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level <10 IU/L, E2<80 pg/ml, anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) 1-3 ng/ml, adequate ovarian responders and availability of at least 5 embryos on post-fertilization check (to allow high chance for obtaining at least 2 good quality embryos available for transfer). Exclusion criteria were patients not fulfilling any of the above criteria, and poor or high responders by previous stimulation history, and ovarian reserve tests by using both Bologna criteria which defines poor ovarian response with at least 2 of the following 3 criteria: 1) Maternal age equal to or above 40 or another risk factor for ovarian response. 2) Abnormal ovarian reserve detected by AMH less than 0.5 or antral follicle count less than 5-7. 3) Previous poor ovarian response (3 oocytes or less with conventional stimulation protocol) (Ferrareti et al., 2011) and ovarian sensitivity index, which is recovered oocytes X 1000/total dose of FSH (Huber ).

Figure 1

Consort Flow Chart

Figure 2

Consort Flow chart of recruitment

Stimulation protocol

The women participating in this study had ovarian stimulation using the mid-luteal long GnRH agonist protocol, which began with daily S.C. injections of 0.1 mg triptorelin (decapeptyl, Ipsen pharma biotech, France) on Day 21 of the pre-stimulation cycle. The GnRH agonist was continued until the day of HCG administration. Gonadotropin was administered daily by S.C. injection of recombinant FSH-follitropin beta (Puregon; Organon, the Netherlands) or recombinant FSH follitropin alpha (Gonal-F; Serono, Switzerland). The dose of gonadotropins was individualized according to the patient’s age, body mass index and previous stimulation history, or response to stimulation using the ovarian sensitivity index (Huber ), started after confirmation of pituitary down-regulation by transvaginal scan on days 4-5 of the period and continued for five days, after which the dose was adjusted according to the ovarian response, which was monitored by transvaginal ultrasound and serum E2 levels. Final oocyte maturation was achieved with a 250 ug injection of recombinant HCG (Ovitrelle, Merck-Serono,Switzerland), when one follicle reached a diameter of ≥18 mm, two follicles reached ≥17 mm, or at least 10 follicles had more than 14 mm. Transvaginal oocyte retrieval was performed under general anesthesia 34-36 h after HCG injection.

Observation of the embryos

Routine ICSI was performed 4 hours after oocyte retrieval for all participating women, and the oocytes were checked for fertilization 16-18 hours later. Normal fertilization was indicated by the appearance of two pronuclei. Once post-fertilization check confirmed the availability of ≥5 embryos, the patients were randomized to one of the 3 groups. The embryos were cultured in a commercial sequential IVF medium (Quinn‘s Advantage Cleavage Medium; SAGE, Pasadena, CA, USA) in triple gas bench-top incubators, with gas concentrations of 6% CO2, 5% O2 and 89% N2. The grading criteria for the embryos were as follows: grade 1, uniform blastomeres, with no DNA fragmentation; grade 2, the blastomere size was slightly uneven with <20% DNA fragmentation; grade 3, the blastomere size was heterogeneous, or with 20-50% DNA fragmentation; and grade 4, >50% DNA fragmentation. The number and grade of the embryonic blastomeres were recorded. Good-quality embryos were defined as embryos containing four cells on day 2 (48h after oocyte retrieval) and six cells on day 3 (72h after oocyte retrieval), with a grade of 1 or 2.

Embryo selection and transfer

Only good quality embryos were transferred. In the day-3 group, two good-quality embryos were transferred. In the day-5 group, two blastocysts were transferred. In the sequential group, one good-quality embryo was transferred on day 3 and one blastocyst was transferred on day 5. Embryo transfer was performed in 20 µl of media using a soft transfer catheter (Cook) under ultrasound guidance. In the current study, we transferred two embryos in each group, since two embryos are needed in the sequential media group. Luteal phase supplementation with vaginal administration of progesterone, 90 mg once daily (Crinone 8%, Serono, United Kingdom) was started from the day of oocyte retrieval and continued for 12 weeks of gestation, if pregnancy was achieved. PGS was not used in any of the participating women according to the unit protocols.

Outcome measures

The primary outcome measures were clinical pregnancies. Other outcome measures were the implantation, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy and live birth rates. Pregnancy testing was performed 14 days after embryo transfer. Ultrasound examination was performed at week 7 (about 5 weeks after transfer) to assess fetal sac number and fetal heartbeat. Clinical pregnancy was defined as the presence of a fetal heartbeat on ultrasound examination at 7 weeks of pregnancy. The implantation rate was defined as the number of gestational sacs seen on the ultrasound, divided by the total number of embryos/ blastocysts transferred. The implantation rate was calculated for all patients having ET and not just those who became pregnant. Spontaneous miscarriage was defined as a clinical pregnancy loss before 20 weeks of gestational age. Multiple pregnancies were defined as two or more gestational sacs seen on ultrasound. Multiple pregnancy rate was defined as number of multiple pregnancies divided by the total number of positive pregnancies.

Sample size calculation

Sample size calculation was estimated to be 210 women (at least 70 cases in each group), based on increased clinical pregnancy rate by 10%, more with the use of sequential embryo transfer versus day-3 or day-5 embryo transfer, and a 10% dropout rate, which achieves 80% power and a significance level (alpha) of 0.05.

Statistical analysis

The results were tabulated and statistically analyzed using a computer software SPSS (statistic a package for social science, Chicago, IL, USA), version 15. The data was expressed as mean±SD unless stated otherwise. We used the chi-squared test to analyze categorical variables in clinical pregnancy rates, while the Student‘s t-test was used for the implantation rate. The probability (P) value was calculated and a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The basic demographic characteristics included age, body mass index (BMI), type of infertility, duration of infertility, cause of infertility, basal FSH, AMH, and failed cycles (table 1).

Table 1

Demographic data of the 3 groups

Parameter	Day 3	Day 5	Sequential
Age (years)	31.3 ± 5.2	31.5 ± 5.3	32.3 ± 5.1
BMI (kg/m2)(µ±SD)	24.5 ± 7.5	22.7 ± 5.8	23.6 ± 6.2
Type of infertility
Primary infertility, n (%)	47 (78.3%)	38 (76%)	39 (78%)
Secondary infertility, n (%)	13 (11.7%)	12 (24%)	11 (12%)
Duration of infertility (years)	4.9 ± 3.4	5.4 ± 2.9	5.2 ± 3.1
Cause of infertility
Tubal/pelvic factor, n (%)	33 (55%)	29 (58%)	25 (50%)
Male factor, n (%)	10 (16.7%)	8 (16%)	10 (20%)
Unexplained infertility, n (%)	17 (28.3%)	13 (26%)	15 (30%)
Basal FSH (IU/L)	5.9 ± 1.4	6.2 ± 1.3	6.1 ± 1.1
AMH ng/ml	1.7 ± 0.5	1.5 ± 0.4	1.6 ± 0.6
Failed cycles (M±SD)	2.1 ± 0.9	2.4 ± 1.1	2.3 ± 1.1

BMI = body mass index, FSH = follicular stimulating hormone, AMH = antimullerian hormone

There were insignificant differences between the three groups regarding retrieved oocytes, number of eggs fertilized, number of eggs cleaved, number of good-quality embryos on day 3, number of cells on day 3 per embryo, transferred embryos, multiple pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate (p>0.05, table 2).

Table 2

Comparison of outcomes for the 3 groups

Parameter	Day 3 (n = 68)	Day 5 (n = 67)	Sequential (n = 69)	p value
Retrieved oocytes	10.4 ± 5.8	10.5 ± 6.1	11.2 ± 6.3	0.53
No. of eggs fertilized	7.2 ± 2.2	7.1 ± 2.5	7.6 ± 2.9	0.46
No. of eggs cleaved	6.3 ± 2.5	5.9 ± 2.3	6.5 ± 2.7	0.74
Good-quality embryos on day 3	4.5 ± 1.9	4.9 ± 1.8	4.7 ± 1.7	0.85
Transferred embryos	2	2	2	1.00
Clinical pregnancy rate	21/68 (31%)	22/67 (33%)	34/69 (49%)	0.04
Live Birth rate	19/68 (28%)	19/67 (28%)	30/69 (43%)	0.04
Multiple pregnancies rate	6/21 (28.5%)	8/22 (36.3%)	12/34 (35.2%)	0.25
Implantation rate	0.29 ± 0.3 (29%)	0.30 ± 0.05	0.39 ± 0.3	0.01
Miscarriage rate	2 (9.5%)	3 (13.6%)	4 (11.7%)	0.71

Data presented as mean ± (standard deviation) or n (%).

The clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the sequential group than in either day-3 or day-5 groups (p<0.05, table 2).

None of the cycles was cancelled as randomization was done after oocyte retrieval, post fertilization check and availability of five or more good quality embryos.

DISCUSSION

The major advantage of sequential transfers over blastocyst transfer is to get the high implantation potential of blastocyst transfers and, at the same time, to avoid a possible frustrating situation of transfer cancellation in cases planned for only blastocyst transfer. Therefore, a strategy of sequential or two-step transfer has been suggested (Tan ). The current study showed that sequential embryo transfer in day 3 (cleavage ET) and day 5 (blastocyst ET) was associated with higher pregnancy, implantation and live birth rates than either day-3 or day-5 embryo transfers. Possible explanations of those results include mechanical endometrial stimulation, which has been associated with higher pregnancy rates in women with recurrent implantation failures (Barash ; Zhou ), this was also found in a recent Cochrane review published by Hennes . This mechanical stimulation of the endometrium may be caused by the transfer catheter used in day 3, which increases endometrial receptivity at the time of blastocyst transfer. Loutradis et al. (2004) and Fang explained this finding by the release of cytokines, as a result of endometrial injury, that enhanced implantation. Another possible explanation, is the increase in the probability of hitting the ‘‘implantation window’’ by two transfers, since timing may differ among patients according to the response of the endometrial to steroid hormones (Almog ). Some authors reported this second explanation as a possible cause for the improved success rates found in women with repeated IVF/ET failures undergoing such intervention (Loutradis et al., 2004; Almog ). Therefore, sequential transfer is recommended for patients with recurrent implantation failures who have good quality embryos (Ismail Madkour ).

Our study is consistent with other studies that concluded that sequential transfers had significantly higher pregnancy, implantation, and live birth rates, compared to conventional day-3 transfers (Nadkarni ; Dalal ; Ismail Madkour ). Stamenov , used frozen embryos in a natural cycle, and found that sequential embryo transfer (1 in day 3 and the other in day 5) had significantly higher implantation and pregnancy rates, significantly lower miscarriage rates, and nonsignificant differences in multiple pregnancy rates, as compared to the transfer of two blastocysts in day 5. While the current study findings differed from that reported by Al-Hasani , Ashkenazi and Tehraninejad who found nonsignificant differences in pregnancy rates between single and double embryo transfers, the past of the women in those two studies, the inclusion criteria and the timing of the initial transfer differed from the current study.

Bungum , ran a randomized controlled trial to compare day-3 with day-5 transfers and found nonsignificant differences in pregnancy rates between both groups, which is consistent with the results of the current study; however, as the cases who completed the study in both groups were almost the same, this could be a possible explanation as to why we had the same figure in regards as the clinical pregnancy rate in both groups.

There have been some criticisms of sequential embryo transfers, namely increased cost and increase rate of multiple pregnancies (Peramo ; Nadkarni ); however, in the current study, and contrary to the study of Nadkarni the number of transferred embryos was similar between the three groups and no difference existed in the incidence of multiple pregnancies, which was in agreement with other studies (Almog ; Ismail Madkour ). The possibility of harming the transferred embryos during the second transfer is also higher, caused by infection or trauma, compared to the embryos transferred earlier (Ashkenazi ); however, neither the current study nor the study done by Tur-Kaspa , showed that the second transfer had any adverse effect on implantation (P2).

There were some limitations of this study. First, we included women with good ovarian response, which precluded studying the role of sequential transfer in poor ovarian responders. Second, using recombinant gonadotropins precluded the studying of the effect of other types of gonadotropins. Therefore, further studies with different modalities of ovarian stimulation and different categories of infertile patients, are warranted.

CONCLUSION

Sequential transfer on day 3 and day 5 in patients with adequate number of retrieved oocytes is associated with a higher embryo implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates and, at the same time, we avoid complications of blastocyst transfers, such as cancellation of the transfer cycle and multiple pregnancies. This technique is advocated for patients having an adequate number of good quality embryos to be replaced on both days of transfer, and thus not suitable for poor ovarian responders.