Literature DB >> 9806266

Difficult or repeated sequential embryo transfers do not adversely affect in-vitro fertilization pregnancy rates or outcome.

I Tur-Kaspa1, Y Yuval, D Bider, J Levron, A Shulman, J Dor.   

Abstract

In order to assist the medical team in the decision-making process and in adequate counselling of patients when encountering technical difficulties at the time of embryo transfer, we investigated the effect of difficult embryo transfer, with or without the need for cervical dilatation or repeated sequential attempts because of retained embryos in the catheter system, on in-vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy rates and outcome. A total of 854 consecutive embryo transfer procedures were prospectively categorized as (i) easy (smooth, unforced), (ii) difficult (requiring uterine manipulation or increased force or cervical grasping and/or accompanied by trauma), (iii) requiring cervical dilatation, or (iv) multiple (two or three) sequential attempts because of embryos retained in the catheter system. Embryo transfer was easy in 734 cases (85.9%). It was difficult in 72 (8.4%), cervical dilatation was required in 21 (2.5%), and one or two repeated attempts were needed in 27 cases (3.2%). Pregnancy rates for the different categories of embryo transfer were 23.3, 23.6, 23.8 and 29.6% respectively. There were no significant differences in the percentage of the ongoing/delivered pregnancies for the different categories of embryo transfer (69, 64.6, 60 and 62.5% respectively). There were no significant differences in the distribution of embryo transfer types among the six infertility specialists who performed the procedures. To conclude, embryo transfers that are difficult to perform or that require cervical dilatation or repeated attempts do not adversely affect pregnancy rates and outcome following IVF. Cervical dilatation, if needed for patients with cervical stenosis, should be performed at the time of the embryo transfer and not earlier. Surgical transmyometrial embryo transfer or rescheduling patients for delayed embryo transfer could be avoided in most patients. This information is important for patient management and counselling in cases of embryo transfer that are not easy to perform.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9806266     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.9.2452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  15 in total

1.  Impact of technical difficulties, choice of catheter, and the presence of blood on the success of embryo transfer--experience from a single provider.

Authors:  Hassan N Sallam; Abdel Fattah Agameya; Ashraf Farrag Rahman; Fathy Ezzeldin; Ahmed N Sallam
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Does catheter choice during embryo transfer alter the pregnancy rate?

Authors:  Pankaj Talwar; Nikita Naredi; K Sandeep; G S Joneja; B S Duggal
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-10-22

3.  Does the Presence of Blood in the Catheter or the Degree of Difficulty of Embryo Transfer Affect Live Birth?

Authors:  Torie C Plowden; Micah J Hill; Shana M Miles; Benjamin Hoyt; Belinda Yauger; James H Segars; John M Csokmay; Rebecca J Chason
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 4.  Usefulness of statistics for establishing evidence-based reproductive medicine.

Authors:  Yasunori Sato; Masahiko Gosho; Kiyotaka Toshimori
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2011-08-05

5.  Effects of embryo transfer quality on pregnancy and live birth delivery rates.

Authors:  Dietmar Spitzer; R Haidbauer; C Corn; J Stadler; B Wirleitner; N H Zech
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  The effect of ease of transfer and type of catheter used on pregnancy and implantation rates in an IVF program.

Authors:  G De Placido; M Wilding; I Stina; A Mollo; E Alviggi; A Tolino; N Colacurci; Matteo L De; M Marino; B Dale
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Effects of embryo retention during embryo transfer on IVF outcomes.

Authors:  Einav Kadour-Peero; Togas Tulandi; Ido Feferkorn; Ranit Hiszkiahu; William Buckett
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.357

8.  National Survey Highlights the Urgent Need for Standardisation of Embryo Transfer Techniques in the UK.

Authors:  Lewis Nancarrow; Nicola Tempest; Andrew J Drakeley; Roy Homburg; Richard Russell; Dharani K Hapangama
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Correlation of technical difficulty during embryo transfer with rate of clinical pregnancy.

Authors:  Neeta Singh; Prerna Gupta; Suneeta Mittal; Neena Malhotra
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2012-09

10.  Comparison of easy and difficult embryo transfer outcomes in in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  Firouzeh Ghaffari; Kiandokht Kiani; Akram Bahmanabadi; Mohammadreza Akhoond
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-03-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.