Literature DB >> 32712247

Improvement of prediction and classification performance for gamma passing rate by using plan complexity and dosiomics features.

Hideaki Hirashima1, Tomohiro Ono2, Mitsuhiro Nakamura3, Yuki Miyabe4, Nobutaka Mukumoto4, Hiraku Iramina4, Takashi Mizowaki4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to predict and classify the gamma passing rate (GPR) value by using new features (3D dosiomics features and combined with plan and dosiomics features) together with a machine learning technique for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 888 patients who underwent VMAT were enrolled comprising 1255 treatment plans. Further, 24 plan complexity features and 851 dosiomics features were extracted from the treatment plans. The dataset was randomly split into a training/validation (80%) and test (20%) dataset. The three models for prediction and classification using XGBoost were as follows: (i) plan complexity features-based prediction method (plan model); (ii) 3D dosiomics feature-based prediction model (dosiomics model); (iii) a combination of both the previous models (hybrid model). The prediction performance was evaluated by calculating the mean absolute error (MAE) and the correlation coefficient (CC) between the predicted and measured GPRs. The classification performance was evaluated by calculating the area under curve (AUC) and sensitivity.
RESULTS: MAE and CC at γ2%/2 mm in the test dataset were 4.6% and 0.58, 4.3% and 0.61, and 4.2% and 0.63 for the plan model, dosiomics model, and hybrid model, respectively. AUC and sensitivity at γ2%/2 mm in test dataset were 0.73 and 0.70, 0.81 and 0.90, and 0.83 and 0.90 for the plan model, dosiomics model, and hybrid model, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A combination of both plan and dosiomics features with machine learning technique can improve the prediction and classification performance for GPR.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification; Dosiomics feature; Gamma passing rate; Machine learning; Plan complexity feature; Prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32712247     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.07.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  5 in total

1.  Deep Learning for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance: Predicting Gamma Passing Rates for IMRT Based on Delivery Fluence Informed by log Files.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Yifei Pi; Kui Ma; Xiaojuan Miao; Sichao Fu; Zhen Zhu; Yifan Cheng; Zhepei Zhang; Hua Chen; Hao Wang; Hengle Gu; Yan Shao; Yanhua Duan; Aihui Feng; Weihai Zhuo; Zhiyong Xu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

Review 2.  Integration of AI and Machine Learning in Radiotherapy QA.

Authors:  Maria F Chan; Alon Witztum; Gilmer Valdes
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2020-09-29

3.  Evaluation of plan robustness on the dosimetry of volumetric arc radiotherapy (VMAT) with set-up uncertainty in Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) radiotherapy.

Authors:  Zhen Ding; Xiaoyong Xiang; Qi Zeng; Jun Ma; Zhitao Dai; Kailian Kang; Suyan Bi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Machine learning for dose-volume histogram based clinical decision-making support system in radiation therapy plans for brain tumors.

Authors:  Pawel Siciarz; Salem Alfaifi; Eric Van Uytven; Shrinivas Rathod; Rashmi Koul; Boyd McCurdy
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-09-15

Review 5.  Deep Learning With Radiomics for Disease Diagnosis and Treatment: Challenges and Potential.

Authors:  Xingping Zhang; Yanchun Zhang; Guijuan Zhang; Xingting Qiu; Wenjun Tan; Xiaoxia Yin; Liefa Liao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 6.244

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.