Literature DB >> 33732544

The role of gender and academic degree on preference for smooth curvature of abstract shapes.

Letizia Palumbo1, Giulia Rampone2, Marco Bertamini2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preference for smooth contours occurs for a variety of visual stimuli. However, there are individual differences. Openness to experience, a trait associated with aesthetic appreciation, emotional sensitivity and abstract thinking, correlates with this preference. The evaluation of meaningless stimuli entails automatic associations influenced by knowledge, intellectual interests and individual experiences which are diverse. However, it is difficult to capture this variability in studies restricted to Undergraduate students in Psychology with a prevalence of female participants.
METHODS: Here we examined preference for curvature with 160 undergraduate students in Psychology, Mathematics, Engineering and Computer Science, balanced for gender. Participants viewed abstract shapes varying for contour (angular vs. curved). The shapes presented variations in Vertices (10, 20, 30) and Concavity (30%, 40%, 50%) to increase complexity. Participants rated how much they liked each shape on a 0 (dislike) to 100 (like) scale. Furthermore, because students in pure Science disciplines present autistic-like traits as measured with the Autism Quotient (AQ), and there is evidence that individuals with autism respond positively to edgy abstract shapes, participants also completed the AQ.
RESULTS: Overall participants preferred curved shapes to angular shapes. We confirmed past research showing that complexity played a key role, with simple shapes with less vertices (10 vertices) being preferred over shapes with larger number of vertices (20 and 30 vertices). Furthermore, simple shapes (10 vertices) were preferred more with more concavities (50%). Importantly, an interaction between academic degree and gender revealed that preference for smooth curvature was stronger for Psychology female participants. Science students scored higher than Psychology students on the AQ. Interestingly, multilevel analyses showed that the variability of AQ traits in the sample did not contribute to this interaction. The results are discussed in relation to theories of preference formation and individual differences. ©2021 Palumbo et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Academic degree; Curvature; Gender; Individual differences; Visual preference

Year:  2021        PMID: 33732544      PMCID: PMC7953868          DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ        ISSN: 2167-8359            Impact factor:   2.984


  27 in total

1.  The extreme male brain theory of autism.

Authors:  Simon Baron-Cohen
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  SEX DIFFERENCES IN AESTHETIC PREFERENCES.

Authors:  O JOHNSON; R H KNAPP
Journal:  J Soc Psychol       Date:  1963-12

3.  Baby schema modulates the brain reward system in nulliparous women.

Authors:  Melanie L Glocker; Daniel D Langleben; Kosha Ruparel; James W Loughead; Jeffrey N Valdez; Mark D Griffin; Norbert Sachser; Ruben C Gur
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture.

Authors:  Oshin Vartanian; Gorka Navarrete; Anjan Chatterjee; Lars Brorson Fich; Helmut Leder; Cristián Modroño; Marcos Nadal; Nicolai Rostrup; Martin Skov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test.

Authors:  A G Greenwald; D E McGhee; J L Schwartz
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-06

6.  Visual elements of subjective preference modulate amygdala activation.

Authors:  Moshe Bar; Maital Neta
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Sex differences in infants' visual interest in toys.

Authors:  Gerianne M Alexander; Teresa Wilcox; Rebecca Woods
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2008-11-19

8.  Do observers like curvature or do they dislike angularity?

Authors:  Marco Bertamini; Letizia Palumbo; Tamara Nicoleta Gheorghes; Mai Galatsidas
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2015-04-13

9.  Simple Shapes Elicit Different Emotional Responses in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Neurotypical Children and Adults.

Authors:  Laurine Belin; Laurence Henry; Mélanie Destays; Martine Hausberger; Marine Grandgeorge
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-30

10.  Common Visual Preference for Curved Contours in Humans and Great Apes.

Authors:  Enric Munar; Gerardo Gómez-Puerto; Josep Call; Marcos Nadal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Living Space: Psychological Well-Being and Mental Health in Response to Interiors Presented in Virtual Reality.

Authors:  Nour Tawil; Izabela Maria Sztuka; Kira Pohlmann; Sonja Sudimac; Simone Kühn
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.