Literature DB >> 33731095

Partnering with healthcare facilities to understand psychosocial distress screening practices among cancer survivors: pilot study implications for study design, recruitment, and data collection.

Diane Ng1, M Shayne Gallaway2, Grace C Huang1, Theresa Famolaro1, Jennifer Boehm2, Karen Stachon3, Elizabeth A Rohan4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to understand barriers and facilitators to implementing distress screening (DS) of cancer patients to inform and promote uptake in cancer treatment facilities. We describe the recruitment and data collection challenges and recommendations for assessing DS in oncology treatment facilities.
METHODS: We recruited CoC-accredited facilities and collected data from each facility's electronic health record (EHR). Collected data included cancer diagnosis and demographics, details on DS, and other relevant patient health data. Data were collected by external study staff who were given access to the facility's EHR system, or by facility staff working locally within their own EHR system. Analyses are based on a pilot study of 9 facilities.
RESULTS: Challenges stemmed from being a multi-facility-based study and local institutional review board (IRB) approval, facility review and approval processes, and issues associated with EHR systems and the lack of DS data standards. Facilities that provided study staff remote-access took longer for recruitment; facilities that performed their own extraction/abstraction took longer to complete data collection.
CONCLUSION: Examining DS practices and follow-up among cancer survivors necessitated recruiting and working directly with multiple healthcare systems and facilities. There were a number of lessons learned related to recruitment, enrollment, and data collection. Using the facilitators described in this manuscript offers increased potential for working successfully with various cancer centers and insight into partnering with facilities collecting non-standardized DS clinical data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Electronic health records; Methods; Oncology; Psychological distress; Research design

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33731095      PMCID: PMC7968218          DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06250-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1472-6963            Impact factor:   2.655


  23 in total

1.  The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records.

Authors:  David Blumenthal; Marilyn Tavenner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Barriers to the delivery of psychosocial care for cancer patients: bridging mind and body.

Authors:  Harold Alan Pincus; Sapana R Patel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Recruitment of hospitals for a safety climate study: facilitators and barriers.

Authors:  Amy K Rosen; David M Gaba; Mark Meterko; Priti Shokeen; Sara Singer; Shibei Zhao; Alan Labonte; Alyson Falwell
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2008-05

4.  Removing the stress from selecting instruments: arming social workers to take leadership in routine distress screening implementation.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Rohan
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2012

Review 5.  No patients left behind: a systematic review of the cultural equivalence of distress screening instruments.

Authors:  Karen Kayser; Chiara Acquati; Thanh V Tran
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2012

6.  Relationship between cancer center accreditation and performance on publicly reported quality measures.

Authors:  Ryan P Merkow; Jeanette W Chung; Jennifer L Paruch; David J Bentrem; Karl Y Bilimoria
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Impact of IRB requirements on a multicenter survey of prophylactic mastectomy outcomes.

Authors:  Sarah M Greene; Ann M Geiger; Emily L Harris; Andrea Altschuler; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Mary B Barton; Sharon J Rolnick; Joann G Elmore; Suzanne Fletcher
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 3.797

Review 8.  Screening for distress and depression in cancer settings: 10 lessons from 40 years of primary-care research.

Authors:  Alex J Mitchell; Arshya Vahabzadeh; Kathryn Magruder
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  A Practice-Based Evaluation of Distress Screening Protocol Adherence and Medical Service Utilization.

Authors:  Brad Zebrack; Karen Kayser; Deborah Bybee; Lynne Padgett; Laura Sundstrom; Chad Jobin; Julianne Oktay
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 10.  Effects of psycho-oncologic interventions on emotional distress and quality of life in adult patients with cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hermann Faller; Michael Schuler; Matthias Richard; Ulrike Heckl; Joachim Weis; Roland Küffner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.