Literature DB >> 23101550

Removing the stress from selecting instruments: arming social workers to take leadership in routine distress screening implementation.

Elizabeth A Rohan1.   

Abstract

Quality cancer care requires identifying and addressing the psychosocial needs of cancer patients. Oncology social workers have long been on the forefront of this endeavor. Although there has been longstanding interest in screening cancer patients for distress, it has recently been included as a quality of care metric in institutions accredited by the American College of Surgeons. Implementing routine screening for distress in oncology settings requires thoughtful planning, including assessing various screening instruments and considering a host of variables within each practice setting. Oncology social workers are best positioned to provide leadership in operationalizing this mandate and to lead their team in the choice of a distress measure for compliance with the screening guideline. This article highlights the most popular distress screening measures used in oncology and their psychometric properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23101550      PMCID: PMC4596227          DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2012.721487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol        ISSN: 0734-7332


  29 in total

1.  History of psycho-oncology: overcoming attitudinal and conceptual barriers.

Authors:  Jimmie C Holland
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.312

2.  A new psychosocial screening instrument for use with cancer patients.

Authors:  J Zabora; K BrintzenhofeSzoc; P Jacobsen; B Curbow; S Piantadosi; C Hooker; A Owens; L Derogatis
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.386

3.  Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma: a pilot study.

Authors:  A J Roth; A B Kornblith; L Batel-Copel; E Peabody; H I Scher; J C Holland
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Validation of the Distress Thermometer, Impact Thermometer and combinations of these in screening for distress.

Authors:  Donald McLaren Baken; Cheryl Woolley
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 5.  No patients left behind: a systematic review of the cultural equivalence of distress screening instruments.

Authors:  Karen Kayser; Chiara Acquati; Thanh V Tran
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2012

Review 6.  The dimensions of oncology social work: intrapsychic, interpersonal, and environmental interventions.

Authors:  J F Hermann; J Carter
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.929

7.  Distress screening in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSCT) caregivers and patients.

Authors:  Margaret Bevans; Leslie Wehrlen; Olena Prachenko; Karen Soeken; James Zabora; Gwenyth R Wallen
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 8.  Accuracy of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale as a screening tool in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Vodermaier; Roanne D Millman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Development of a brief screening interview for adjustment disorders and major depression in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Nobuya Akizuki; Tatsuo Akechi; Tatsuro Nakanishi; Eisho Yoshikawa; Masako Okamura; Tomohito Nakano; Yoshie Murakami; Yosuke Uchitomi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Group psychological therapy for cancer patients. A brief discussion of indications for its use, and the range of interventions available.

Authors:  A J Cunningham
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.603

View more
  5 in total

1.  ExCEL in Social Work: Excellence in Cancer Education & Leadership: An Oncology Social Work Response to the 2008 Institute of Medicine Report.

Authors:  Shirley Otis-Green; Barbara Jones; Brad Zebrack; Lisa Kilburn; Terry A Altilio; Betty Ferrell
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  The association of psychosocial screening and service provision in pediatric oncology: the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT2.0) into clinical practice.

Authors:  M C McCarthy; S DeGraves; C E Wakefield; M J Bowden; L V Marks; L K Williams
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Literature review to assemble the evidence for response scales used in patient-reported outcome measures.

Authors:  Katharine Gries; Pamela Berry; Magdalena Harrington; Mabel Crescioni; Mira Patel; Katja Rudell; Shima Safikhani; Sheryl Pease; Margaret Vernon
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2018-09-06

4.  Partnering with healthcare facilities to understand psychosocial distress screening practices among cancer survivors: pilot study implications for study design, recruitment, and data collection.

Authors:  Diane Ng; M Shayne Gallaway; Grace C Huang; Theresa Famolaro; Jennifer Boehm; Karen Stachon; Elizabeth A Rohan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Comprehensive cancer control: promoting survivor health and wellness.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Rohan; Nina Miller; Floyd Bonner; Kristi Fultz-Butts; Mandi L Pratt-Chapman; Catherine M Alfano; Kristen Cox Santiago; Kendall Bergman; Eric Tai
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.506

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.