Brad Zebrack1,2, Karen Kayser3, Deborah Bybee4, Lynne Padgett5, Laura Sundstrom1, Chad Jobin1, Julianne Oktay6,7. 1. University of Michigan School of Social Work 2. University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 3. University of Louisville Kent School of Social Work, Louisville, Kentucky 4. Michigan State University, Lansing, Michigan 5. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia 6. University of Maryland School of Social Work, Baltimore, Maryland 7. Association of Oncology Social Work, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois
Abstract
Background: This study examined the extent to which cancer programs demonstrated adherence to their own prescribed screening protocol, and whether adherence to that protocol was associated with medical service utilization. The hypothesis is that higher rates of service utilization are associated with lower rates of adherence to screening protocols. Methods: Oncology social workers at Commission on Cancer-accredited cancer programs reviewed electronic health records (EHRs) in their respective cancer programs during a 2-month period in 2014. Rates of overall adherence to a prescribed distress screening protocol were calculated based on documentation in the EHR that screening adherence and an appropriate clinical response had occurred. We examined documentation of emergency department (ED) use and hospitalization within 2 months after the screening visit. Results: Review of 8,409 EHRs across 55 cancer centers indicated that the overall adherence rate to screening protocols was 62.7%. The highest rates of adherence were observed in Community Cancer Programs (76.3%) and the lowest rates were in NCI-designated Cancer Centers (43.3%). Rates of medical service utilization were significantly higher than expected when overall protocol adherence was lacking. After controlling for patient and institutional characteristics, risk ratios for ED use (0.82) and hospitalization (0.81) suggest that when overall protocol adherence was documented, 18% to 19% fewer patients used these medical services. Conclusions: The observed associations between a mandated psychosocial care protocol and medical service utilization suggest opportunities for operational efficiencies and costs savings. Further investigations of protocol integrity, as well as the clinical care models by which psychosocial care is delivered, are warranted.
Background: This study examined the extent to which cancer programs demonstrated adherence to their own prescribed screening protocol, and whether adherence to that protocol was associated with medical service utilization. The hypothesis is that higher rates of service utilization are associated with lower rates of adherence to screening protocols. Methods: Oncology social workers at Commission on Cancer-accredited cancer programs reviewed electronic health records (EHRs) in their respective cancer programs during a 2-month period in 2014. Rates of overall adherence to a prescribed distress screening protocol were calculated based on documentation in the EHR that screening adherence and an appropriate clinical response had occurred. We examined documentation of emergency department (ED) use and hospitalization within 2 months after the screening visit. Results: Review of 8,409 EHRs across 55 cancer centers indicated that the overall adherence rate to screening protocols was 62.7%. The highest rates of adherence were observed in Community Cancer Programs (76.3%) and the lowest rates were in NCI-designated Cancer Centers (43.3%). Rates of medical service utilization were significantly higher than expected when overall protocol adherence was lacking. After controlling for patient and institutional characteristics, risk ratios for ED use (0.82) and hospitalization (0.81) suggest that when overall protocol adherence was documented, 18% to 19% fewer patients used these medical services. Conclusions: The observed associations between a mandated psychosocial care protocol and medical service utilization suggest opportunities for operational efficiencies and costs savings. Further investigations of protocol integrity, as well as the clinical care models by which psychosocial care is delivered, are warranted.
Authors: Michelle B Riba; Kristine A Donovan; Barbara Andersen; IIana Braun; William S Breitbart; Benjamin W Brewer; Luke O Buchmann; Matthew M Clark; Molly Collins; Cheyenne Corbett; Stewart Fleishman; Sofia Garcia; Donna B Greenberg; Rev George F Handzo; Laura Hoofring; Chao-Hui Huang; Robin Lally; Sara Martin; Lisa McGuffey; William Mitchell; Laura J Morrison; Megan Pailler; Oxana Palesh; Francine Parnes; Janice P Pazar; Laurel Ralston; Jaroslava Salman; Moreen M Shannon-Dudley; Alan D Valentine; Nicole R McMillian; Susan D Darlow Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Erin E Hahn; Corrine E Munoz-Plaza; Dana Pounds; Lindsay Joe Lyons; Janet S Lee; Ernest Shen; Benjamin D Hong; Shannon La Cava; Farah M Brasfield; Lara N Durna; Karen W Kwan; David B Beard; Alexander Ferreira; Aswini Padmanabhan; Michael K Gould Journal: JAMA Date: 2022-01-04 Impact factor: 157.335
Authors: Kelly M Trevino; Charlotte Healy; Peter Martin; Beverly Canin; Karl Pillemer; Jo Anne Sirey; M Cary Reid Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Jaya S Khushalani; Jin Qin; John Cyrus; Natasha Buchanan Lunsford; Sun Hee Rim; Xuesong Han; K Robin Yabroff; Donatus U Ekwueme Journal: Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 2.217
Authors: Kelly M Trevino; Christian J Nelson; Rebecca M Saracino; Beatriz Korc-Grodzicki; Saman Sarraf; Armin Shahrokni Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Kristine A Donovan; Luigi Grassi; Teresa L Deshields; Cheyenne Corbett; Michelle B Riba Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 6.892
Authors: Nicole L Stout; Daniel Santa Mina; Kathleen D Lyons; Karen Robb; Julie K Silver Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: J Alberto Maldonado; Shuangshuang Fu; Ying-Shiuan Chen; Chiara Acquati; K Robin Yabroff; Matteo P Banegas; Shine Chang; Rena M Conti; Cristina M Checka; Susan K Peterson; Pragati Advani; Kimberly Ku; Reshma Jagsi; Sharon H Giordano; Robert J Volk; Ya-Chen T Shih; Grace L Smith Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2021-05-27