Literature DB >> 27399813

Predicting Arsenic in Drinking Water Wells of the Central Valley, California.

Joseph D Ayotte1, Bernard T Nolan2, Jo Ann Gronberg3.   

Abstract

Probabilities of arsenic in groundwater at depths used for domestic and public supply in the Central Valley of California are predicted using weak-learner ensemble models (boosted regression trees, BRT) and more traditional linear models (logistic regression, LR). Both methods captured major processes that affect arsenic concentrations, such as the chemical evolution of groundwater, redox differences, and the influence of aquifer geochemistry. Inferred flow-path length was the most important variable but near-surface-aquifer geochemical data also were significant. A unique feature of this study was that previously predicted nitrate concentrations in three dimensions were themselves predictive of arsenic and indicated an important redox effect at >10 μg/L, indicating low arsenic where nitrate was high. Additionally, a variable representing three-dimensional aquifer texture from the Central Valley Hydrologic Model was an important predictor, indicating high arsenic associated with fine-grained aquifer sediment. BRT outperformed LR at the 5 μg/L threshold in all five predictive performance measures and at 10 μg/L in four out of five measures. BRT yielded higher prediction sensitivity (39%) than LR (18%) at the 10 μg/L threshold-a useful outcome because a major objective of the modeling was to improve our ability to predict high arsenic areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27399813     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b01914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  Estimating the High-Arsenic Domestic-Well Population in the Conterminous United States.

Authors:  Joseph D Ayotte; Laura Medalie; Sharon L Qi; Lorraine C Backer; Bernard T Nolan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Overpumping leads to California groundwater arsenic threat.

Authors:  Ryan Smith; Rosemary Knight; Scott Fendorf
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Machine Learning Models of Arsenic in Private Wells Throughout the Conterminous United States As a Tool for Exposure Assessment in Human Health Studies.

Authors:  Melissa A Lombard; Molly Scannell Bryan; Daniel K Jones; Catherine Bulka; Paul M Bradley; Lorraine C Backer; Michael J Focazio; Debra T Silverman; Patricia Toccalino; Maria Argos; Matthew O Gribble; Joseph D Ayotte
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  How or When Samples Are Collected Affects Measured Arsenic Concentration in New Drinking Water Wells.

Authors:  Melinda L Erickson; Helen F Malenda; Emily C Berquist
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.671

5.  Is Food Irrigated with Oilfield-Produced Water in the California Central Valley Safe to Eat? A Probabilistic Human Health Risk Assessment Evaluating Trace Metals Exposure.

Authors:  Jennifer Hoponick Redmon; Andrew John Kondash; Donna Womack; Ted Lillys; Laura Feinstein; Luis Cabrales; Erika Weinthal; Avner Vengosh
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Groundwater Used as a Source of Drinking Water in the Eastern United States.

Authors:  Peter B McMahon; Andrea K Tokranov; Laura M Bexfield; Bruce D Lindsey; Tyler D Johnson; Melissa A Lombard; Elise Watson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 9.028

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.