Literature DB >> 33729514

Reflection on modern methods: Dynamic prediction using joint models of longitudinal and time-to-event data.

Eleni-Rosalina Andrinopoulou1, Michael O Harhay2,3,4, Sarah J Ratcliffe5, Dimitris Rizopoulos1.   

Abstract

Individualized prediction is a hallmark of clinical medicine and decision making. However, most existing prediction models rely on biomarkers and clinical outcomes available at a single time. This is in contrast to how health states progress and how physicians deliver care, which relies on progressively updating a prognosis based on available information. With the use of joint models of longitudinal and survival data, it is possible to dynamically adjust individual predictions regarding patient prognosis. This article aims to introduce the reader to the development of dynamic risk predictions and to provide the necessary resources to support their implementation and assessment, such as adaptable R code, and the theory behind the methodology. Furthermore, measures to assess the predictive performance of the derived predictions and extensions that could improve the predictions are presented. We illustrate personalized predictions using an online dataset consisting of patients with chronic liver disease (primary biliary cirrhosis).
© The Author(s) 2021; all rights reserved. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Joint model; dynamic predictions; longitudinal outcome; personalized risk predictions; survival outcome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33729514      PMCID: PMC8783548          DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyab047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  22 in total

1.  Identification and efficacy of longitudinal markers for survival.

Authors:  Robin Henderson; Peter Diggle; Angela Dobson
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Personalized screening intervals for biomarkers using joint models for longitudinal and survival data.

Authors:  Dimitris Rizopoulos; Jeremy M G Taylor; Joost Van Rosmalen; Ewout W Steyerberg; Johanna J M Takkenberg
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 3.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Individual dynamic predictions using landmarking and joint modelling: Validation of estimators and robustness assessment.

Authors:  Loïc Ferrer; Hein Putter; Cécile Proust-Lima
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Comparison of joint modeling and landmarking for dynamic prediction under an illness-death model.

Authors:  Krithika Suresh; Jeremy M G Taylor; Daniel E Spratt; Stephanie Daignault; Alexander Tsodikov
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 2.207

6.  Individualized predictions of disease progression following radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jeremy M G Taylor; Menggang Yu; Howard M Sandler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Combined dynamic predictions using joint models of two longitudinal outcomes and competing risk data.

Authors:  Eleni-Rosalina Andrinopoulou; D Rizopoulos; Johanna Jm Takkenberg; E Lesaffre
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew J Vickers; Nancy R Cook; Thomas Gerds; Mithat Gonen; Nancy Obuchowski; Michael J Pencina; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 9.  A review of spline function procedures in R.

Authors:  Aris Perperoglou; Willi Sauerbrei; Michal Abrahamowicz; Matthias Schmid
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Individualized dynamic prediction of survival with the presence of intermediate events.

Authors:  Grigorios Papageorgiou; Mostafa M Mokhles; Johanna J M Takkenberg; Dimitris Rizopoulos
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  2 in total

1.  Factors associated to the duration of COVID-19 lockdowns in Chile.

Authors:  Jessica Pavani; Jaime Cerda; Luis Gutiérrez; Inés Varas; Iván Gutiérrez; Leonardo Jofré; Oscar Ortiz; Gabriel Arriagada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Intrinsic Capacity Predicts Negative Health Outcomes in Older Adults.

Authors:  Erwin Stolz; Hannes Mayerl; Wolfgang Freidl; Regina Roller-Wirnsberger; Thomas M Gill
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 6.591

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.