Literature DB >> 15681526

Individualized predictions of disease progression following radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Jeremy M G Taylor1, Menggang Yu, Howard M Sandler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Following treatment for localized prostate cancer, men are monitored with serial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements. Refining the predictive value of post-treatment PSA determinations may add to clinical management, and we have developed a model that predicts future PSA values and the time to future clinical recurrence for individual patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 934 patients treated between 1987 and 2000 were used to develop a comprehensive statistical model to fit the clinical recurrence events and patterns of PSA data. A logistic model was used for the probability of cure, mixed models were used for serial PSA measurements, and a proportional hazards model was used for recurrences. Data available through February 2001 were fit to the model, and data collected between February 2001 and September 2003 were used for validation.
RESULTS: T-stage, baseline PSA, and radiotherapy dosage are all associated with probability of cure. The risk of clinical recurrence in those not cured is strongly affected by the slope of PSA values. We show how the model can be used for individual monitoring of disease progression. For each patient the model predicts, based on baseline characteristics and all post-treatment PSA values, the probability of future clinical recurrences and future PSA values. The model accurately predicts risk of recurrence and future PSA values in the validation data set.
CONCLUSION: This predictive information on future PSA values and the risk of clinical relapse for each individual patient, which can be updated with each additional PSA value, may prove useful to patients and physicians in determining post-treatment salvage strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15681526     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.12.156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  30 in total

1.  Deriving benefit of early detection from biomarker-based prognostic models.

Authors:  L Y T Inoue; R Gulati; C Yu; M W Kattan; R Etzioni
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  A hybrid Newton-type method for censored survival data using double weights in linear models.

Authors:  Menggang Yu; Bin Nan
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Landmark Linear Transformation Model for Dynamic Prediction with Application to a Longitudinal Cohort Study of Chronic Disease.

Authors:  Yayuan Zhu; Liang Li; Xuelin Huang
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2018-12-23       Impact factor: 1.864

4.  Comparison of joint modeling and landmarking for dynamic prediction under an illness-death model.

Authors:  Krithika Suresh; Jeremy M G Taylor; Daniel E Spratt; Stephanie Daignault; Alexander Tsodikov
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 2.207

5.  Analysis of accelerated failure time data with dependent censoring using auxiliary variables via nonparametric multiple imputation.

Authors:  Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Jeremy M G Taylor; Chengcheng Hu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Confirmation of a low α/β ratio for prostate cancer treated by external beam radiation therapy alone using a post-treatment repeated-measures model for PSA dynamics.

Authors:  Cécile Proust-Lima; Jeremy M G Taylor; Solène Sécher; Howard Sandler; Larry Kestin; Tom Pickles; Kyoungwha Bae; Roger Allison; Scott Williams
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Effect of trajectories of glycemic control on mortality in type 2 diabetes: a semiparametric joint modeling approach.

Authors:  Mulugeta Gebregziabher; Leonard E Egede; Cheryl P Lynch; Carrae Echols; Yumin Zhao
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 8.  Validation of biomarker-based risk prediction models.

Authors:  Jeremy M G Taylor; Donna P Ankerst; Rebecca R Andridge
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Real-time individual predictions of prostate cancer recurrence using joint models.

Authors:  Jeremy M G Taylor; Yongseok Park; Donna P Ankerst; Cecile Proust-Lima; Scott Williams; Larry Kestin; Kyoungwha Bae; Tom Pickles; Howard Sandler
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Joint modelling of longitudinal and multi-state processes: application to clinical progressions in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Loïc Ferrer; Virginie Rondeau; James Dignam; Tom Pickles; Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda; Cécile Proust-Lima
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.