Literature DB >> 33728562

Prosociality and reciprocity in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus).

Mathilde Lalot1, Fabienne Delfour2,3, Birgitta Mercera2, Dalila Bovet4.   

Abstract

Some moral behaviours, often regarded as reflecting high cognitive abilities (such as empathy, cooperation, targeted helping) are known to only be present in very few species, like great apes, elephants and cetaceans. Prosocial behaviours (producing a benefit for the recipient without necessarily involving a cost for the actor) have been mostly found in primates and, more recently, in elephants. Despite dolphins' reputation for helping their conspecifics, experimental studies about their prosocial and empathic abilities are rare. We conducted Prosocial Choice Tests in six bottlenose dolphins. The subjects had to choose between three objects: choosing the prosocial object induced the simultaneous rewarding of both the subject and a recipient individual; choosing the selfish object induced a reward only for the subject; choosing the null one did not reward anyone. We found prosociality and direct reciprocity in our subjects, and our results suggested that bottlenose dolphins might be able to modulate their prosocial and reciprocal tendencies according to partner-specific information. Subjects seemed to be more prosocial towards the other sex and more reciprocal towards same-sex recipients. This reciprocity might be underpinned by the same features that rule their behaviours in the wild (cooperating with same sex conspecifics). Moreover, an audience effect was reported, as the presence of the subject's young increased subjects' likelihood of prosocial response. Our findings highlighted that prosociality could appear in taxa other than primates, suggesting a convergent evolutionary phenomenon.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bottlenose dolphins; Prosociality; Reciprocity; Sex; Tursiops truncatus

Year:  2021        PMID: 33728562     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-021-01499-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  36 in total

1.  Two levels of alliance formation among male bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.).

Authors:  R C Connor; R A Smolker; A F Richards
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Image scoring and cooperation in a cleaner fish mutualism.

Authors:  Redouan Bshary; Alexandra S Grutter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Putting the altruism back into altruism: the evolution of empathy.

Authors:  Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Hunting behavior of wild chimpanzees in the Taï National Park.

Authors:  C Boesch; H Boesch
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.868

5.  Acoustic behavior associated with cooperative task success in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus).

Authors:  Holli C Eskelinen; Kelley A Winship; Brittany L Jones; Audra E M Ames; Stan A Kuczaj
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting.

Authors:  Melissa Bateson; Daniel Nettle; Gilbert Roberts
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  The evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  R Axelrod; W D Hamilton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-03-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  No evidence of short-term exchange of meat for sex among chimpanzees.

Authors:  Ian C Gilby; M Emery Thompson; Jonathan D Ruane; Richard Wrangham
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.895

9.  Calculated reciprocity after all: computation behind token transfers in orang-utans.

Authors:  V Dufour; M Pelé; M Neumann; B Thierry; J Call
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Wild chimpanzees exchange meat for sex on a long-term basis.

Authors:  Cristina M Gomes; Christophe Boesch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Adult bonobos show no prosociality in both prosocial choice task and group service paradigm.

Authors:  Jonas Verspeek; Edwin J C van Leeuwen; Daan W Laméris; Nicky Staes; Jeroen M G Stevens
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.984

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.