Literature DB >> 33725981

Phrenic nerve stimulation, a rare complication of pacemaker: A case report.

Meddy Dalex1, Astrid Malezieux1, Thibault Parent1, Dina Zekry1,2, Christine Serratrice1,2.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: The phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) is a rare complication after pacemaker setting. We report a case report that describes this complication and how it can be resolved. PATIENT CONCERNS: An 88-year-old man presented himself to the emergency geriatric unit with intermittent painless abdominal contraction due to phrenic nerve stimulation. He has a history of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker due to persistent left bundle branch block. DIAGNOSES: All the usual causes for abdominal spasms were eliminated and the possibility of a link with the pacemaker was considered. The phrenic nerve stimulation is a rare complication of a pacemaker implantation. It can be clinically nonrelevant but challenging to diagnose for those not familiar with cardiac devices technology.
INTERVENTIONS: Initial setting was an axis of stimulation between distal left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular. It was changed to LV and D1-M2. OUTCOMES: This noninvasive procedure managed to eradicate the involuntary abdominal spasms. LESSONS: PNS could be challenging to diagnose for those not familiar with cardiac devices technology but easy to manage with noninvasive methods.
Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33725981      PMCID: PMC7982205          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.817


  10 in total

1.  Phrenic stimulation: a challenge for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Mauro Biffi; Carlotta Moschini; Matteo Bertini; Davide Saporito; Matteo Ziacchi; Igor Diemberger; Cinzia Valzania; Giulia Domenichini; Elena Cervi; Cristian Martignani; Diego Sangiorgi; Angelo Branzi; Giuseppe Boriani
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-06-11

2.  Occurrence of phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: the role of left ventricular lead type and placement site.

Authors:  Mauro Biffi; Derek V Exner; George H Crossley; Brian Ramza; Benoit Coutu; Gery Tomassoni; Wolfgang Kranig; Shelby Li; Nina Kristiansen; Frederik Voss
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 5.214

3.  Influence of pacing configurations, body mass index, and position of coronary sinus lead on frequency of phrenic nerve stimulation and pacing thresholds under cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Martin Seifert; Thomas Schau; Viviane Moeller; Michael Neuss; Juergen Meyhoefer; Christian Butter
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 4.  Phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Ghassan Moubarak; Abdeslam Bouzeman; Jacky Ollitrault; Frederic Anselme; Serge Cazeau
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy may predict late phrenic nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Justo Juliá; María López-Gil; Adolfo Fontenla; Álvaro Lozano; Lola Villagraz; Rafael Salguero; Fernando Arribas
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 5.214

6.  Comparison of different pacing strategies to minimize phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Jose F Huizar; Karoly Kaszala; Jayanthi N Koneru; Leroy R Thacker; Kenneth A Ellenbogen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-04-26

7.  A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people.

Authors:  Kenneth Rockwood; Xiaowei Song; Chris MacKnight; Howard Bergman; David B Hogan; Ian McDowell; Arnold Mitnitski
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Pacemaker complications and costs: a nationwide economic study.

Authors:  Nicolas Clémenty; Jérôme Fernandes; Phuong Lien Carion; Lucie de Léotoing; Ludovic Lamarsalle; Fanny Wilquin-Bequet; Claudia Wolff; Koen J P Verhees; Emmanuelle Nicolle; Jean-Claude Deharo
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 2.448

9.  Pacemaker implantation after TAVI: predictors of AV block persistence.

Authors:  Luise Gaede; Won-Keun Kim; Christoph Liebetrau; Oliver Dörr; Johannes Sperzel; Johannes Blumenstein; Alexander Berkowitsch; Thomas Walther; Christian Hamm; Albrecht Elsässer; Holger Nef; Helge Möllmann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 5.460

10.  Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Delivered Via a Multipolar Left Ventricular Lead is Associated with Reduced Mortality and Elimination of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation: Long-Term Follow-Up from a Multicenter Registry.

Authors:  Jonathan M Behar; Julian Bostock; Adrian Po Zhu Li; Hui Men Selina Chin; Stephen Jubb; Edward Lent; James Gamble; Paul W X Foley; Tim R Betts; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi; Neil Herring
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-03-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.