| Literature DB >> 33723620 |
José Júlio Costa Sidrim1, Gerlane Luziana de Maria1, Manoel de Araújo Neto Paiva2, Géssica Dos Santos Araújo3, Renan Vasconcelos da Graça-Filho1, Jonathas Sales de Oliveira1, Jamille Alencar Sales1, Waldemiro Aquino Pereira-Neto1, Glaucia Morgana de Melo Guedes1, Débora de Souza Collares Maia Castelo-Branco1, Rossana de Aguiar Cordeiro1, Raimunda Sâmia Nogueira Brilhante4, Marcos Fábio Gadelha Rocha1,3.
Abstract
This study aimed to identify Candida spp. from agricultural soils cultivated with azole fungicides and investigate their susceptibility to clinical (fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B) and agricultural (tetraconazole and tebuconazole) antifungals in planktonic form. Additionally, Candida biofilm-forming ability and biofilm susceptibility to agricultural antifungals and voriconazole were analyzed. Species identification was performed by phenotypic and molecular assays. The susceptibility of planktonic cells was evaluated by the broth microdilution method. The biofilm metabolic activity was evaluated by the XTT reduction assay. The recovered Candida spp. were identified as C. parapsilosis sensu stricto (n = 14), C. albicans (n = 5), C. tropicalis (n = 2), C. fermentati (n = 1), and C. metapsilosis (n = 2). Minimum inhibitory concentration ranges for clinical and agricultural antifungals were ≤ 0.03-4 μg/mL and 1-128 μg/mL, respectively. Two and one C. albicans strains were considered non-wild type for voriconazole and fluconazole, respectively. All strains were biofilm producers. The minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration ranges for tetraconazole and tebuconazole were 128-> 1024 μg/mL, while for voriconazole was 512-> 1024 μg/mL. In summary, this study shows that non-wild type and azole-resilient biofilm-producing Candida species colonize agricultural soils cultivated with azole fungicides.Entities:
Keywords: Antifungals; Biofilm; Candida; Fungicides; Soil
Year: 2021 PMID: 33723620 DOI: 10.1007/s00248-021-01694-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Ecol ISSN: 0095-3628 Impact factor: 4.552