Literature DB >> 33723620

Azole-Resilient Biofilms and Non-wild Type C. albicans Among Candida Species Isolated from Agricultural Soils Cultivated with Azole Fungicides: an Environmental Issue?

José Júlio Costa Sidrim1, Gerlane Luziana de Maria1, Manoel de Araújo Neto Paiva2, Géssica Dos Santos Araújo3, Renan Vasconcelos da Graça-Filho1, Jonathas Sales de Oliveira1, Jamille Alencar Sales1, Waldemiro Aquino Pereira-Neto1, Glaucia Morgana de Melo Guedes1, Débora de Souza Collares Maia Castelo-Branco1, Rossana de Aguiar Cordeiro1, Raimunda Sâmia Nogueira Brilhante4, Marcos Fábio Gadelha Rocha1,3.   

Abstract

This study aimed to identify Candida spp. from agricultural soils cultivated with azole fungicides and investigate their susceptibility to clinical (fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B) and agricultural (tetraconazole and tebuconazole) antifungals in planktonic form. Additionally, Candida biofilm-forming ability and biofilm susceptibility to agricultural antifungals and voriconazole were analyzed. Species identification was performed by phenotypic and molecular assays. The susceptibility of planktonic cells was evaluated by the broth microdilution method. The biofilm metabolic activity was evaluated by the XTT reduction assay. The recovered Candida spp. were identified as C. parapsilosis sensu stricto (n = 14), C. albicans (n = 5), C. tropicalis (n = 2), C. fermentati (n = 1), and C. metapsilosis (n = 2). Minimum inhibitory concentration ranges for clinical and agricultural antifungals were ≤ 0.03-4 μg/mL and 1-128 μg/mL, respectively. Two and one C. albicans strains were considered non-wild type for voriconazole and fluconazole, respectively. All strains were biofilm producers. The minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration ranges for tetraconazole and tebuconazole were 128-> 1024 μg/mL, while for voriconazole was 512-> 1024 μg/mL. In summary, this study shows that non-wild type and azole-resilient biofilm-producing Candida species colonize agricultural soils cultivated with azole fungicides.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antifungals; Biofilm; Candida; Fungicides; Soil

Year:  2021        PMID: 33723620     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-021-01694-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  14 in total

1.  Development of two molecular approaches for differentiation of clinically relevant yeast species closely related to Candida guilliermondii and Candida famata.

Authors:  Xiaobo Feng; Jingsong Wu; Bo Ling; Xianwei Yang; Wanqing Liao; Weihua Pan; Zhirong Yao
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis spp. nov. to replace Candida parapsilosis groups II and III.

Authors:  Arianna Tavanti; Amanda D Davidson; Neil A R Gow; Martin C J Maiden; Frank C Odds
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Candida tropicalis from veterinary and human sources shows similar in vitro hemolytic activity, antifungal biofilm susceptibility and pathogenesis against Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Raimunda Sâmia Nogueira Brilhante; Jonathas Sales de Oliveira; Antônio José de Jesus Evangelista; Rosana Serpa; Aline Lobão da Silva; Felipe Rodrigues Magalhães de Aguiar; Vandbergue Santos Pereira; Débora de Souza Collares Maia Castelo-Branco; Waldemiro Aquino Pereira-Neto; Rossana de Aguiar Cordeiro; José Júlio Costa Sidrim; Marcos Fábio Gadelha Rocha
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Suppression of Rhizoctonia solani diseases of sugar beet by antagonistic and plant growth-promoting yeasts.

Authors:  K A El-Tarabily
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.772

5.  Azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: a side-effect of environmental fungicide use?

Authors:  Paul E Verweij; Eveline Snelders; Gert H J Kema; Emilia Mellado; Willem J G Melchers
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 25.071

6.  Effects of pesticides on yeasts isolated from agricultural soil.

Authors:  Elena Sláviková; Renata Vadkertiová
Journal:  Z Naturforsch C J Biosci       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

7.  Comparison of EUCAST and CLSI broth microdilution methods for the susceptibility testing of 10 systemically active antifungal agents when tested against Candida spp.

Authors:  Michael A Pfaller; Mariana Castanheira; Shawn A Messer; Paul R Rhomberg; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 2.803

8.  Fungal biofilm resistance.

Authors:  Gordon Ramage; Ranjith Rajendran; Leighann Sherry; Craig Williams
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-08

9.  Comparison of human and soil Candida tropicalis isolates with reduced susceptibility to fluconazole.

Authors:  Yun-Liang Yang; Chih-Chao Lin; Te-Pin Chang; Tsai-Ling Lauderdale; Hui-Ting Chen; Ching-Fu Lee; Chih-Wen Hsieh; Pei-Chen Chen; Hsiu-Jung Lo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Yeasts of the soil - obscure but precious.

Authors:  Andrey M Yurkov
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.239

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Fungicide effects on human fungal pathogens: Cross-resistance to medical drugs and beyond.

Authors:  Rafael W Bastos; Luana Rossato; Gustavo H Goldman; Daniel A Santos
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 6.823

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.