Literature DB >> 24736096

Comparison of EUCAST and CLSI broth microdilution methods for the susceptibility testing of 10 systemically active antifungal agents when tested against Candida spp.

Michael A Pfaller1, Mariana Castanheira2, Shawn A Messer2, Paul R Rhomberg2, Ronald N Jones2.   

Abstract

The antifungal broth microdilution (BMD) method of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) was compared with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) BMD method M27-A3 for amphotericin B, flucytosine, anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin, fluconazole, isavuconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole susceptibility testing of 357 isolates of Candida. The isolates were selected from global surveillance collections to represent both wild-type (WT) and non-WT MIC results for the azoles (12% of fluconazole and voriconazole results were non-WT) and the echinocandins (6% of anidulafungin and micafungin results were non-WT). The study collection included 114 isolates of Candida albicans, 73 of C. glabrata, 76 of C. parapsilosis, 60 of C. tropicalis, and 34 of C. krusei. The overall essential agreement (EA) between EUCAST and CLSI results ranged from 78.9% (posaconazole) to 99.6% (flucytosine). The categorical agreement (CA) between methods and species of Candida was assessed using previously determined CLSI epidemiological cutoff values. The overall CA between methods was 95.0% with 2.5% very major (VM) and major (M) discrepancies. The CA was >93% for all antifungal agents with the exception of caspofungin (84.6%), where 10% of the results were categorized as non-WT by the EUCAST method and WT by the CLSI method. Problem areas with low EA or CA include testing of amphotericin B, anidulafungin, and isavuconazole against C. glabrata, itraconazole, and posaconazole against most species, and caspofungin against C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei. We confirm high level EA and CA (>90%) between the 2 methods for testing fluconazole, voriconazole, and micafungin against all 5 species. The results indicate that the EUCAST and CLSI methods produce comparable results for testing the systemically active antifungal agents against the 5 most common species of Candida; however, there are several areas where additional steps toward harmonization are warranted.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CLSI; Candida; EUCAST; Susceptibility testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24736096     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  28 in total

1.  Azole-Resilient Biofilms and Non-wild Type C. albicans Among Candida Species Isolated from Agricultural Soils Cultivated with Azole Fungicides: an Environmental Issue?

Authors:  José Júlio Costa Sidrim; Gerlane Luziana de Maria; Manoel de Araújo Neto Paiva; Géssica Dos Santos Araújo; Renan Vasconcelos da Graça-Filho; Jonathas Sales de Oliveira; Jamille Alencar Sales; Waldemiro Aquino Pereira-Neto; Glaucia Morgana de Melo Guedes; Débora de Souza Collares Maia Castelo-Branco; Rossana de Aguiar Cordeiro; Raimunda Sâmia Nogueira Brilhante; Marcos Fábio Gadelha Rocha
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  A phase 2, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of three dosing regimens of isavuconazole compared with fluconazole in patients with uncomplicated esophageal candidiasis.

Authors:  J Viljoen; N Azie; A-H Schmitt-Hoffmann; M Ghannoum
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Echinocandin resistance, susceptibility testing and prophylaxis: implications for patient management.

Authors:  David S Perlin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Activity of Isavuconazole and Other Azoles against Candida Clinical Isolates and Yeast Model Systems with Known Azole Resistance Mechanisms.

Authors:  Dominique Sanglard; Alix T Coste
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Intra- and Interlaboratory Agreement in Assessing the In Vitro Activity of Micafungin against Common and Rare Candida Species with the EUCAST, CLSI, and Etest Methods.

Authors:  J Meletiadis; E Geertsen; I Curfs-Breuker; J F Meis; J W Mouton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Fluconazole Resistance in Isolates of Uncommon Pathogenic Yeast Species from the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Andrew M Borman; Julian Muller; Jo Walsh-Quantick; Adrien Szekely; Zoe Patterson; Michael D Palmer; Mark Fraser; Elizabeth M Johnson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Fungemia Surveillance in Denmark Demonstrates Emergence of Non-albicans Candida Species and Higher Antifungal Usage and Resistance Rates than in Other Nations.

Authors:  Mariana Castanheira
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Anidulafungin Pharmacokinetics in Ascites Fluid and Pleural Effusion of Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  R Welte; P Eller; I Lorenz; M Joannidis; R Bellmann
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Candida parapsilosis: from Genes to the Bedside.

Authors:  Renáta Tóth; Jozef Nosek; Héctor M Mora-Montes; Toni Gabaldon; Joseph M Bliss; Joshua D Nosanchuk; Siobhán A Turner; Geraldine Butler; Csaba Vágvölgyi; Attila Gácser
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Epidemiology of echinocandin resistance in Candida.

Authors:  Nina T Grossman; Tom M Chiller; Shawn R Lockhart
Journal:  Curr Fungal Infect Rep       Date:  2014-09-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.