| Literature DB >> 27527785 |
Raimunda Sâmia Nogueira Brilhante1, Jonathas Sales de Oliveira2, Antônio José de Jesus Evangelista3, Rosana Serpa2, Aline Lobão da Silva4, Felipe Rodrigues Magalhães de Aguiar2, Vandbergue Santos Pereira2, Débora de Souza Collares Maia Castelo-Branco2, Waldemiro Aquino Pereira-Neto2, Rossana de Aguiar Cordeiro5, José Júlio Costa Sidrim2, Marcos Fábio Gadelha Rocha6.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro hemolytic activity and biofilm antifungal susceptibility of veterinary and human Candida tropicalis strains, as well as their pathogenesis against Caenorhabditis elegans. Twenty veterinary isolates and 20 human clinical isolates of C. tropicalis were used. The strains were evaluated for their hemolytic activity and biofilm production. Biofilm susceptibility to itraconazole, fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B and caspofungin was assessed using broth microdilution assay. The in vivo evaluation of strain pathogenicity was investigated using the nematode C. elegans. Hemolytic factor was observed in 95% of the strains and 97.5% of the isolates showed ability to form biofilm. Caspofungin and amphotericin B showed better results than azole antifungals against mature biofilms. Paradoxical effect on mature biofilm metabolic activity was observed at elevated concentrations of caspofungin (8-64μg/mL). Azole antifungals were not able to inhibit mature C. tropicalis biofilms, even at the higher tested concentrations. High mortality rates of C. elegans were observed when the worms were exposed to with C. tropicalis strains, reaching up to 96%, 96h after exposure of the worms to C. tropicalis strains. These results reinforce the high pathogenicity of C. tropicalis from veterinary and human sources and show the effectiveness of caspofungin and amphotericin B against mature biofilms of this species.Entities:
Keywords: Biofilm susceptibility; Caenorhabditis elegans; Candida tropicalis; Pathogenesis; Virulence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27527785 DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.07.022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Microbiol ISSN: 0378-1135 Impact factor: 3.293