Literature DB >> 33723315

Impact of age, sex, and joint form on degenerative lesions of the sacroiliac joints on CT in the normal population.

Katharina Ziegeler1, Virginie Kreutzinger2, Torsten Diekhoff3, Robert Roehle4, Denis Poddubnyy5, Matthias Pumberger6, Bernd Hamm3, Kay Geert A Hermann3.   

Abstract

Degeneration of the sacroiliac joints (SIJs) is a common finding, while its underlying cause and development remain incompletely understood. The aim of this investigation was to describe the spatial distribution of degenerative SIJ changes across age groups and to investigate for the first time their relationship to anatomical form and sex. For this IRB-approved investigation, demographic data of 818 patients without SIJ disease were retrieved from electronic patient records. High-resolution computed tomography (CT) datasets of all patients were analysed retrospectively for seven predefined age groups (ten-year increments, from < 25 to ≥ 75). A structured scoring system was applied to assess sclerosis, osteophytes, joint space alterations, and anatomical form. Chi-square tests were used to compare frequencies of degenerative lesions, and logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate associations between demographic data, anatomical form, and the presence of structural lesions. Sclerosis and osteophytes were common findings, with an overall prevalence of 45.7% and 46.8%, respectively. Female sex had an odds ratio (OR) of 0.15 (95% CI: 0.08-0.27) for the presence of ventral osteophytes and of 4.42 (95% CI: 2.77-7.04) for dorsal osteophytes. Atypical joint forms were significantly more prevalent in women with 62.1% vs. 14.1% in men (p < 0.001). Accessory joints increased the likelihood of dorsal sclerosis (OR 2.735; 95% CI 1.376-5.436) while a typical joint form decreased its likelihood (OR 0.174; 95% CI 0.104-0.293). Sex and anatomical joint form have a major impact on the development of degenerative lesions of the SIJs and their spatial distribution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33723315      PMCID: PMC7960989          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85303-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  27 in total

1.  The prevalence of sacroiliac joint degeneration in asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  Jonathan-James T Eno; Christopher R Boone; Michael J Bellino; Julius A Bishop
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  The epidemiology of low back pain in the rest of the world. A review of surveys in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  E Volinn
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Improved detection of erosions in the sacroiliac joints on MRI with volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE): results from the SIMACT study.

Authors:  Torsten Diekhoff; Juliane Greese; Joachim Sieper; Denis Poddubnyy; Bernd Hamm; Kay-Geert A Hermann
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.

Authors:  Terry K Koo; Mae Y Li
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-03-31

5.  Morphometric anatomical and CT study of the human adult sacroiliac region.

Authors:  Roberto Postacchini; Guido Trasimeni; Francesca Ripani; Pasquale Sessa; Stefano Perotti; Franco Postacchini
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Sacroiliac joints: anatomical variants on CT.

Authors:  P K Prassopoulos; C P Faflia; A E Voloudaki; N C Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Comparison of MRI with radiography for detecting structural lesions of the sacroiliac joint using CT as standard of reference: results from the SIMACT study.

Authors:  Kay-Geert A Hermann; Torsten Diekhoff; Juliane Greese; Carsten Schwenke; Denis Poddubnyy; Bernd Hamm; Joachim Sieper
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  The aging process in the sacroiliac joint: helical computed tomography analysis.

Authors:  Yasuaki Shibata; Yasumasa Shirai; Masabumi Miyamoto
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.601

9.  Degeneration of sacroiliac joint after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: a prospective cohort study over five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kee-Yong Ha; Jun-Seok Lee; Ki-Won Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Variation in the appearance of the normal sacroiliac joint on pelvic CT.

Authors:  C P Faflia; P K Prassopoulos; M E Daskalogiannaki; N C Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.350

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  MRI-guided sacroiliac joint injections in children and adults: current practice and future developments.

Authors:  Danoob Dalili; Amanda Isaac; Jan Fritz
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 2.128

2.  Unexpected Sex Differences in the Relationship of Sacroiliac Joint and Lumbar Spine Degeneration.

Authors:  Maximilian Muellner; Virginie Kreutzinger; Luis Becker; Torsten Diekhoff; Matthias Pumberger; Friederike Schömig; Mark Heyland; Katharina Ziegeler
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-21

Review 3.  Anatomical Joint Form Variation in Sacroiliac Joint Disease: Current Concepts and New Perspectives.

Authors:  Katharina Ziegeler; Kay Geert A Hermann; Torsten Diekhoff
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  What amount of structural damage defines sacroiliitis: a CT study.

Authors:  Kay Geert A Hermann; Katharina Ziegeler; Virginie Kreutzinger; Denis Poddubnyy; Fabian Proft; Dominik Deppe; Juliane Greese; Joachim Sieper; Torsten Diekhoff
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2022-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.