Literature DB >> 26041855

The prevalence of sacroiliac joint degeneration in asymptomatic adults.

Jonathan-James T Eno1, Christopher R Boone2, Michael J Bellino1, Julius A Bishop1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Degenerative changes of the sacroiliac joint have been implicated as a cause of lower back pain in adults. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of sacroiliac joint degeneration in asymptomatic patients.
METHODS: Five hundred consecutive pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans, made at a tertiary-care medical center, of patients with no history of pain in the lower back or pelvic girdle were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed for degenerative changes of the sacroiliac joint. After exclusion criteria were applied, 373 CT scans (746 sacroiliac joints) were evaluated for degenerative changes. Regression analysis was used to determine the association between age and the degree of sacroiliac joint degeneration.
RESULTS: The prevalence of sacroiliac joint degeneration was 65.1%, with substantial degeneration occurring in 30.5% of asymptomatic subjects. The prevalence steadily increased with age, with 91% of subjects in the ninth decade of life displaying degenerative changes.
CONCLUSIONS: Radiographic evidence of sacroiliac joint degeneration is highly prevalent in the asymptomatic population and is associated with age. Caution must be exercised when attributing lower back or pelvic girdle pain to sacroiliac joint degeneration seen on imaging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2015 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26041855     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  15 in total

1.  Does Level of Response to SI Joint Block Predict Response to SI Joint Fusion?

Authors:  David Polly; Daniel Cher; Peter G Whang; Clay Frank; Jonathan Sembrano
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-01-21

2.  International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity.

Authors:  Morgan Lorio; Richard Kube; Ali Araghi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

3.  ISASS Policy 2016 Update - Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.

Authors:  Morgan P Lorio
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-07-13

4.  Associated factors for and progression rate of sacroiliac joint degeneration in subjects undergoing comprehensive medical checkups.

Authors:  Yusuke Sato; Kosuke Kashiwabara; Yuki Taniguchi; Yoshitaka Matsubayashi; So Kato; Toru Doi; Shima Hirai; Naohiro Tachibana; Hiroyuki Hasebe; Koji Nakajima; Naoto Hayashi; Sakae Tanaka; Yasushi Oshima
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Sacroiliac joint beyond sacroiliitis-further insights and old concepts on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Bruno Cerretti Carneiro; Thiago Astil Rizzetto; Flávio Duarte Silva; Isabela Azevedo Nicodemos da Cruz; Júlio Brandão Guimarães; Alípio Gomes Ormond Filho; Marcelo Astolfi Caetano Nico
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.128

6.  Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.

Authors:  David W Polly; John Swofford; Peter G Whang; Clay J Frank; John A Glaser; Robert P Limoni; Daniel J Cher; Kathryn D Wine; Jonathan N Sembrano
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-08-23

7.  Is minimally invasive sacroiliac joint arthrodesis the treatment of choice for sacroiliac joint dysfunction?

Authors:  M Burhan Janjua; Sumanth Reddy; William C Welch; Peter G Passias
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

8.  Durable intermediate-to long-term outcomes after minimally invasive transiliac sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants.

Authors:  Donald Sachs; Don Kovalsky; Andy Redmond; Robert Limoni; S Craig Meyer; Charles Harvey; Dimitriy Kondrashov
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2016-07-13

9.  Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs Nonsurgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: 12-Month Outcomes.

Authors:  David W Polly; Daniel J Cher; Kathryn D Wine; Peter G Whang; Clay J Frank; Charles F Harvey; Harry Lockstadt; John A Glaser; Robert P Limoni; Jonathan N Sembrano
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Ignoring the sacroiliac joint in chronic low back pain is costly.

Authors:  David W Polly; Daniel Cher
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2016-01-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.