Literature DB >> 33722289

Prime editing in mice reveals the essentiality of a single base in driving tissue-specific gene expression.

Pan Gao1, Qing Lyu1, Amr R Ghanam1, Cicera R Lazzarotto2, Gregory A Newby3,4,5, Wei Zhang1, Mihyun Choi6, Orazio J Slivano1, Kevin Holden7, John A Walker7, Anastasia P Kadina7, Rob J Munroe8, Christian M Abratte8, John C Schimenti8, David R Liu3,4,5, Shengdar Q Tsai2, Xiaochun Long9, Joseph M Miano10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most single nucleotide variants (SNVs) occur in noncoding sequence where millions of transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) reside. Here, a comparative analysis of CRISPR-mediated homology-directed repair (HDR) versus the recently reported prime editing 2 (PE2) system was carried out in mice over a TFBS called a CArG box in the Tspan2 promoter.
RESULTS: Quantitative RT-PCR showed loss of Tspan2 mRNA in aorta and bladder, but not heart or brain, of mice homozygous for an HDR-mediated three base pair substitution in the Tspan2 CArG box. Using the same protospacer, mice homozygous for a PE2-mediated single-base substitution in the Tspan2 CArG box displayed similar cell-specific loss of Tspan2 mRNA; expression of an overlapping long noncoding RNA was also nearly abolished in aorta and bladder. Immuno-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization validated loss of Tspan2 in vascular smooth muscle cells of HDR and PE2 CArG box mutant mice. Targeted sequencing demonstrated variable frequencies of on-target editing in all PE2 and HDR founders. However, whereas no on-target indels were detected in any of the PE2 founders, all HDR founders showed varying levels of on-target indels. Off-target analysis by targeted sequencing revealed mutations in many HDR founders, but none in PE2 founders.
CONCLUSIONS: PE2 directs high-fidelity editing of a single base in a TFBS leading to cell-specific loss in expression of an mRNA/long noncoding RNA gene pair. The PE2 platform expands the genome editing toolbox for modeling and correcting relevant noncoding SNVs in the mouse.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR; Gene expression; Genome editing; Mouse; Prime editing; Transcription

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33722289      PMCID: PMC7962346          DOI: 10.1186/s13059-021-02304-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Biol        ISSN: 1474-7596            Impact factor:   13.583


  55 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of RNA polymerase II transcription by sequence-specific DNA binding factors.

Authors:  James T Kadonaga
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors.

Authors:  Andrew V Anzalone; Luke W Koblan; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Targeted mutagenesis of the endogenous mouse Mis gene promoter: in vivo definition of genetic pathways of vertebrate sexual development.

Authors:  N A Arango; R Lovell-Badge; R R Behringer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-11-12       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  The UCSC Genome Browser database: 2017 update.

Authors:  Cath Tyner; Galt P Barber; Jonathan Casper; Hiram Clawson; Mark Diekhans; Christopher Eisenhart; Clayton M Fischer; David Gibson; Jairo Navarro Gonzalez; Luvina Guruvadoo; Maximilian Haeussler; Steve Heitner; Angie S Hinrichs; Donna Karolchik; Brian T Lee; Christopher M Lee; Parisa Nejad; Brian J Raney; Kate R Rosenbloom; Matthew L Speir; Chris Villarreal; John Vivian; Ann S Zweig; David Haussler; Robert M Kuhn; W James Kent
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  No unexpected CRISPR-Cas9 off-target activity revealed by trio sequencing of gene-edited mice.

Authors:  Vivek Iyer; Katharina Boroviak; Mark Thomas; Brendan Doe; Laura Riva; Edward Ryder; David J Adams
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 5.917

6.  Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases.

Authors:  Sangsu Bae; Jeongbin Park; Jin-Soo Kim
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Evaluation of off-target and on-target scoring algorithms and integration into the guide RNA selection tool CRISPOR.

Authors:  Maximilian Haeussler; Kai Schönig; Hélène Eckert; Alexis Eschstruth; Joffrey Mianné; Jean-Baptiste Renaud; Sylvie Schneider-Maunoury; Alena Shkumatava; Lydia Teboul; Jim Kent; Jean-Stephane Joly; Jean-Paul Concordet
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Genome-Wide Off-Target Analysis in CRISPR-Cas9 Modified Mice and Their Offspring.

Authors:  Yan Dong; Haimei Li; Liang Zhao; Peter Koopman; Feng Zhang; Johnny X Huang
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Efficient generation of mouse models with the prime editing system.

Authors:  Yao Liu; Xiangyang Li; Siting He; Shuhong Huang; Chao Li; Yulin Chen; Zhen Liu; Xingxu Huang; Xiaolong Wang
Journal:  Cell Discov       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 38.079

10.  CHANGE-seq reveals genetic and epigenetic effects on CRISPR-Cas9 genome-wide activity.

Authors:  Cicera R Lazzarotto; Nikolay L Malinin; Yichao Li; Ruochi Zhang; Yang Yang; GaHyun Lee; Eleanor Cowley; Yanghua He; Xin Lan; Kasey Jividen; Varun Katta; Natalia G Kolmakova; Christopher T Petersen; Qian Qi; Evgheni Strelcov; Samantha Maragh; Giedre Krenciute; Jian Ma; Yong Cheng; Shengdar Q Tsai
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 68.164

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Designing and executing prime editing experiments in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Jordan L Doman; Alexander A Sousa; Peyton B Randolph; Peter J Chen; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 17.021

2.  Application of prime editing to the correction of mutations and phenotypes in adult mice with liver and eye diseases.

Authors:  Hyewon Jang; Dong Hyun Jo; Chang Sik Cho; Jeong Hong Shin; Jung Hwa Seo; Goosang Yu; Ramu Gopalappa; Daesik Kim; Sung-Rae Cho; Jeong Hun Kim; Hyongbum Henry Kim
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 29.234

3.  Historical DNA Manipulation Overview.

Authors:  Lluis Montoliu
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  Highly efficient generation of isogenic pluripotent stem cell models using prime editing.

Authors:  Hanqin Li; Oriol Busquets; Yogendra Verma; Khaja Mohieddin Syed; Nitzan Kutnowski; Gabriella R Pangilinan; Luke A Gilbert; Helen S Bateup; Donald C Rio; Dirk Hockemeyer; Frank Soldner
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 5.  The use of new CRISPR tools in cardiovascular research and medicine.

Authors:  Masataka Nishiga; Chun Liu; Lei S Qi; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 49.421

Review 6.  Genetic therapies for the first molecular disease.

Authors:  Phillip A Doerfler; Akshay Sharma; Jerlym S Porter; Yan Zheng; John F Tisdale; Mitchell J Weiss
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 7.  In vivo somatic cell base editing and prime editing.

Authors:  Gregory A Newby; David R Liu
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 8.  Fate and State of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells in Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Joseph M Miano; Edward A Fisher; Mark W Majesky
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 39.918

Review 9.  Gene Therapies for Monogenic Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Authors:  Wout Weuring; Jeroen Geerligs; Bobby P C Koeleman
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Dual-AAV delivering split prime editor system for in vivo genome editing.

Authors:  Shengyao Zhi; Yuxi Chen; Guanglan Wu; Jinkun Wen; Jinni Wu; Qianyi Liu; Yang Li; Rui Kang; Sihui Hu; Jiahui Wang; Puping Liang; Junjiu Huang
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 11.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.