Literature DB >> 24193117

Maternal mosaicism is a significant contributor to discordant sex chromosomal aneuploidies associated with noninvasive prenatal testing.

Yanlin Wang1, Yan Chen, Feng Tian, Jianguang Zhang, Zhuo Song, Yi Wu, Xu Han, Wenjing Hu, Duan Ma, David Cram, Weiwei Cheng.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the human fetus, sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) are as prevalent as the common autosomal trisomies 21, 18, and 13. Currently, most noninvasive prenatal tests (NIPTs) offer screening only for chromosomes 21, 18, and 13, because the sensitivity and specificity are markedly higher than for the sex chromosomes. Limited studies suggest that the reduced accuracy associated with detecting SCAs is due to confined placental, placental, or true fetal mosaicism. We hypothesized that an altered maternal karyotype may also be an important contributor to discordant SCA NIPT results.
METHODS: We developed a rapid karyotyping method that uses massively parallel sequencing to measure the degree of chromosome mosaicism. The method was validated with DNA models mimicking XXX and XO mosaicism and then applied to maternal white blood cell (WBC) DNA from patients with discordant SCA NIPT results.
RESULTS: Sequencing karyotyping detected chromosome X (ChrX) mosaicism as low as 5%, allowing an accurate assignment of the maternal X karyotype. In a prospective NIPT study, we showed that 16 (8.6%) of 181 positive SCAs were due to an abnormal maternal ChrX karyotype that masked the true contribution of the fetal ChrX DNA fraction.
CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of NIPT for ChrX and ChrY can be improved substantially by integrating the results of maternal-plasma sequencing with those for maternal-WBC sequencing. The relatively high frequency of maternal mosaicism warrants mandatory WBC testing in both shotgun sequencing- and single-nucleotide polymorphism-based clinical NIPT after the finding of a potential fetal SCA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24193117     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2013.215145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  53 in total

1.  Unbalanced human embryos secrete more hyperglycosylated human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG-H) than balanced ones.

Authors:  Dimitar Parvanov; Dragomira Nikolova; Rumiana Ganeva; Kristina Nikolova; Magdalena Vasileva; Ivaylo Rangelov; Maria Pancheva; Maria Serafimova; Rada Staneva; Savina Hadjidekova; Fabio Scarpellini; Georgi Stamenov
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Clinical application of next-generation sequencing in preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles for Robertsonian and reciprocal translocations.

Authors:  Wenke Zhang; Ying Liu; Li Wang; Hui Wang; Minyue Ma; Mengnan Xu; Xiaofei Xu; ZhiYing Gao; Jinliang Duan; David S Cram; Yuanqing Yao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Pregnancy: Prepare for unexpected prenatal test results.

Authors:  Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Noninvasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy using cell-free DNA - New implications for maternal health.

Authors:  Lisa Hui
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2016-06-07

5.  Clinical Utility of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening from Maternal Blood.

Authors:  Viorica Radoi; Camil Bohiltea; Roxana Bohiltea; Monica Cirstoiu
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2015-09

6.  Non-invasive prenatal testing for sex chromosome abnormalities: a source of confusion.

Authors:  Erkan Kalafat; Mehmet Murat Seval; Batuhan Turgay; Acar Koç
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-01-28

Review 7.  Prenatal and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Joris Robert Vermeesch; Thierry Voet; Koenraad Devriendt
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 8.  Screening for fetal chromosomal and subchromosomal disorders.

Authors:  Sarah Harris; Dallas Reed; Neeta L Vora
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 9.  Have we done our last amniocentesis? Updates on cell-free DNA for Down syndrome screening.

Authors:  Kathryn J Gray; Louise E Wilkins-Haug
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-03-17

Review 10.  Cell-Free DNA Screening: Complexities and Challenges of Clinical Implementation.

Authors:  Matthew R Grace; Emily Hardisty; Sarah K Dotters-Katz; Neeta L Vora; Jeffrey A Kuller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.347

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.