Literature DB >> 33718755

Subcutaneous progesterone versus vaginal progesterone for luteal-phase support in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: A cross-sectional study.

Abbas Aflatoonian1, Banafsheh Mohammadi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Luteal-phase support is a complex and controversial issue in the field of reproductive management.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of low-dose subcutaneous progesterone with the vaginal progesterone for luteal-phase support in patients undergoing rozen-thawed embryo transfer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, information related to 77 women that had frozen-thawed embryo transfer was reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups based on the route of progesterone administration used as a luteal-phase support. When the endometrial thickness reached ≥ 8 mm, in one group progesterone (Prolutex) 25 mg/ daily subcutaneous and in another group, vaginal progesterone (CyclogestⓇ) 400 mg twice or (EndometrinⓇ) 100 mg thrice daily, were administrated and continued until menstruation or in case of clinical pregnancy for 8 wk after the embryo transfer when the fetal heart activity was detected by ultrasonography.
RESULTS: The patient's characteristics were matched and there was no significant difference. The chemical and clinical pregnancy rate was higher in the vaginal progesterone group compared to the prolutex group, but statistically unnoticeable, (40% vs. 29.6%, p = 0.367) and (28% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.581), respectively.
CONCLUSION: The findings of this study demonstrate that the new subcutaneous progesterone can be a good alternative for intramuscular progesterone in women that dislike and do not accept vaginal formulations as luteal-phase support in assisted reproductive technology.
Copyright © 2021 Aflatoonian et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pregnancy.; Subcutaneous; Vaginal; Progesterone

Year:  2021        PMID: 33718755      PMCID: PMC7922294          DOI: 10.18502/ijrm.v19i2.8469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed        ISSN: 2476-3772


  17 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics and endometrial effects of the vaginal administration of micronized progesterone in an oil-based solution to postmenopausal women.

Authors:  E Cicinelli; V Borraccino; D Petruzzi; N Mazzotta; M L Cerundolo; L M Schönauer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  A randomized trial comparing the endometrial effects of daily subcutaneous administration of 25 mg and 50 mg progesterone in aqueous preparation.

Authors:  Dominique de Ziegler; Michael Sator; Daniela Binelli; Chiara Leuratti; Barbara Cometti; Claire Bourgain; Yao-Shi X Fu; Gerhard Garhöfer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 3.  Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles.

Authors:  Michelle van der Linden; Karen Buckingham; Cindy Farquhar; Jan A M Kremer; Mostafa Metwally
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-07

4.  A randomized study comparing Crinone 8% and intramuscular progesterone supplementation in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  A M Propst; J A Hill; E S Ginsburg; S Hurwitz; J Politch; E H Yanushpolsky
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Progesterone for preparation of the endometrium for frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer in vitro fertilization cycles: a prospective study on patients' opinions on a new subcutaneous formulation.

Authors:  Roberta Venturella; Alberto Vaiarelli; Laura Buffo; Pietro D'alessandro; Silvia Colamaria; Sara Pedri; Costantino Di Carlo; Erminia Alviggi; Marina Forte; Federica Faustini; Fulvio Zullo; Laura Rienzi; Flippo M Ubaldi
Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.260

6.  Pharmacokinetics and safety profile of a novel progesterone aqueous formulation administered by the s.c. route.

Authors:  Michael Sator; Milko Radicioni; Barbara Cometti; Luca Loprete; Chiara Leuratti; Doreen Schmidl; Gerhard Garhöfer
Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 2.260

7.  Matched-samples comparison of intramuscular versus vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.

Authors:  Naveed Khan; Kevin S Richter; Tasha L Newsome; Emily J Blake; Vladimir I Yankov
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Effects of intramuscular and vaginal progesterone supplementation on frozen-thawed embryo transfer.

Authors:  Lei Jiang; Zhuo-Ye Luo; Gui-Min Hao; Bu-Lang Gao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Subcutaneous Progesterone Is Effective and Safe for Luteal Phase Support in IVF: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of the Phase III Trials.

Authors:  Jakob Doblinger; Barbara Cometti; Silvia Trevisan; Georg Griesinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Determining the Optimal Duration of Progesterone Supplementation prior to Transfer of Cryopreserved Embryos and Its Impact on Implantation and Pregnancy Rates: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Sangita Sharma; Abha Majumdar
Journal:  Int J Reprod Med       Date:  2016-09-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.