Literature DB >> 23806850

A randomized trial comparing the endometrial effects of daily subcutaneous administration of 25 mg and 50 mg progesterone in aqueous preparation.

Dominique de Ziegler1, Michael Sator, Daniela Binelli, Chiara Leuratti, Barbara Cometti, Claire Bourgain, Yao-Shi X Fu, Gerhard Garhöfer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of a new P preparation in aqueous solution for subcutaneous injection for inducing the predecidual transformation of the endometrium.
DESIGN: Prospective, single-blinded, randomized, parallel pilot trial.
SETTING: University-affiliated clinical research center. PATIENT(S): Twenty-five regularly cycling female volunteers. INTERVENTION(S): Volunteers, aged 18-45 years, body mass index 19-25 kg/m(2), whose ovaries were suppressed with a GnRH agonist were estrogenized for 14 or 21 days with the use of transdermal systems delivering 0.1 mg/d E₂. After confirming that the endometrial thickness was >7 mm, the women were randomized to 25 mg or 50 mg of subcutaneous P injections daily for 11 days, after which the endometrium was sampled with the use of a Pipelle device. The endometrial biopsies were evaluated by two independent pathologists. Adverse events and subjective tolerance were checked every day by the study investigator. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Predecidual changes in endometrial biopsies obtained after 11 days of subcutaneous administration of P. RESULT(S): Of 24 biopsies performed (one dropout), 22 provided tissue for histologic analysis. Evidence of predecidual changes in the endometrial stroma was found in 100% of the cases, with no differences between the two studied doses. CONCLUSION(S): Both doses of the new aqueous P preparation available for subcutaneous administration demonstrated predecidual changes in 100% of the interpretable endometrial biopsies in total absence of endogenous P. This offers good prospect of efficacy in luteal phase support for the lowest dose tested, 25 mg/d, the physiologic amount produced daily by the ovary during the midluteal phase. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00377923.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Progesterone; aqueous; decidualization; luteal phase support; subcutaneous

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23806850     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  10 in total

1.  Has ART Finally Got a Patient-Friendly Progesterone?

Authors:  Gautam N Allahbadia
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-10

2.  Subcutaneous progesterone versus vaginal progesterone for luteal-phase support in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Abbas Aflatoonian; Banafsheh Mohammadi
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2021-02-21

3.  Comparison of intramuscular versus subcutaneous aqueous progesterone for luteal phase support in artificially prepared frozen embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Emre Niyazi Turgut; Fazilet Kübra Boynukalın; Meral Gültomruk; Zalihe Yarkıner; Mustafa Bahçeci
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-12-10

4.  Comparison of Subcutaneous and Vaginal Progesterone Used for Luteal Phase Support in Patients Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles.

Authors:  Saghar Salehpour; Nasrin Saharkhiz; Leila Nazari; Ali Sobhaneian; Sedighe Hosseini
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2021-04-27

5.  Serum progesterone levels greater than 32.5 ng/ml on the day of embryo transfer are associated with lower live birth rate after artificial endometrial preparation: a prospective study.

Authors:  Ashraf Alyasin; Marzieh Agha-Hosseini; Motahareh Kabirinasab; Hojatollah Saeidi; Maryam Shabani Nashtaei
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  A randomized, controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of aqueous subcutaneous progesterone with vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support of in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Valerie L Baker; Christopher A Jones; Kevin Doody; Russell Foulk; Bill Yee; G David Adamson; Barbara Cometti; Gary DeVane; Gary Hubert; Silvia Trevisan; Fred Hoehler; Clarence Jones; Michael Soules
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Subcutaneous Progesterone Is Effective and Safe for Luteal Phase Support in IVF: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of the Phase III Trials.

Authors:  Jakob Doblinger; Barbara Cometti; Silvia Trevisan; Georg Griesinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Progesterone administration for luteal phase deficiency in human reproduction: an old or new issue?

Authors:  Stefano Palomba; Susanna Santagni; Giovanni Battista La Sala
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.234

9.  Intramuscular progesterone (Gestone) versus vaginal progesterone suppository (Cyclogest) for luteal phase support in cycles of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: patient preference and drug efficacy.

Authors:  Amal Yaseen Zaman; Serdar Coskun; Ahmed Abdullah Alsanie; Khalid Arab Awartani
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2017-11-09

Review 10.  Implantation Failures and Miscarriages in Frozen Embryo Transfers Timed in Hormone Replacement Cycles (HRT): A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Dominique de Ziegler; Paul Pirtea; Jean Marc Ayoubi
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.