Literature DB >> 11730742

A randomized study comparing Crinone 8% and intramuscular progesterone supplementation in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles.

A M Propst1, J A Hill, E S Ginsburg, S Hurwitz, J Politch, E H Yanushpolsky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of Crinone 8% intravaginal progesterone gel vs. IM progesterone for luteal phase and early pregnancy support after IVF-ET.
DESIGN: Randomized, open-label study.
SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENT(S): Two hundred and one women undergoing IVF-ET. INTERVENTION(S): Women were randomized to supplementation with Crinone 8% (90 mg once daily) or IM progesterone (50 mg once daily) beginning the day after oocyte retrieval. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pregnancy, embryo implantation, and live birth rates. RESULT(S): The women randomized to luteal phase supplementation with IM progesterone had significantly higher clinical pregnancy (48.5% vs. 30.4%; odds ratio [OR], 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21, 3.87), embryo implantation (24.1% vs. 17.5%; OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.08, 3.30), and live birth rates (39.4% vs. 24.5%; OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.10, 3.70) than women randomized to Crinone 8%. CONCLUSION(S): In women undergoing IVF-ET, once-a-day progesterone supplementation with Crinone 8%, beginning the day after oocyte retrieval, resulted in significantly lower embryo implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates compared with women supplemented with IM progesterone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11730742     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02872-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  17 in total

1.  Route of progesterone administration for luteal phase support may affect outcome of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF with ICSI using GnRH antagonist.

Authors:  Mustafa Bahceci; Ulun Ulug
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Timing luteal support in assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew T Connell; Jennifer M Szatkowski; Nancy Terry; Alan H DeCherney; Anthony M Propst; Micah J Hill
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Subclinical pregnancy losses among women undergoing in-vitro fertilization with ICSI.

Authors:  Ulun Ulug; Suleyman Tosun; Esra Aksoy Jozwiak; Ali Mesut; Alper Sismanoglu; Mustafa Bahceci
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Progesterone and the luteal phase: a requisite to reproduction.

Authors:  Tolga B Mesen; Steven L Young
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 5.  Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles.

Authors:  Michelle van der Linden; Karen Buckingham; Cindy Farquhar; Jan A M Kremer; Mostafa Metwally
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-07

6.  Progesterone PLGA/mPEG-PLGA Hybrid Nanoparticle Sustained-Release System by Intramuscular Injection.

Authors:  Bin Xie; Yang Liu; Yuting Guo; Enbo Zhang; Chenguang Pu; Haibing He; Tian Yin; Xing Tang
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Luteal phase bleeding after IVF cycles: comparison between progesterone vaginal gel and intramuscular progesterone and correlation with pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Sami Jabara; Kurt Barnhart; Joan C Schertz; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  J Exp Clin Assist Reprod       Date:  2009-10-20

Review 8.  The optimal duration of progesterone supplementation in pregnant women after IVF/ICSI: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xi-Ru Liu; Hua-Qiao Mu; Qi Shi; Xiao-Qiu Xiao; Hong-Bo Qi
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 5.211

9.  Comparison of intravaginal progesterone gel and intramuscular 17-α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate in luteal phase support.

Authors:  Funda Satir; Tayfun Toptas; Murat Inel; Munire Erman-Akar; Omur Taskin
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Patients' administration preferences: progesterone vaginal insert (Endometrin®) compared to intramuscular progesterone for Luteal phase support.

Authors:  Angeline N Beltsos; Mark D Sanchez; Kevin J Doody; Mark R Bush; Alice D Domar; Michael G Collins
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.