Mikael A K Juntunen1,2, Antti O Kotiaho2, Miika T Nieminen1,2,3, Satu I Inkinen1. 1. University of Oulu, Research Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics, and Technology, Oulu, Finland. 2. Oulu University Hospital, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu, Finland. 3. Medical Research Center, University of Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Abstract
Purpose: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring with computed tomography (CT) has been proposed as a screening tool for coronary artery disease, but concerns remain regarding the radiation dose of CT CAC scoring. Photon counting detectors and iterative reconstruction (IR) are promising approaches for patient dose reduction, yet the preservation of CAC scores with IR has been questioned. The purpose of this study was to investigate the applicability of IR for quantification of CAC using a photon counting flat-detector. Approach: We imaged a cardiac rod phantom with calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA) inserts with different noise levels using an experimental photon counting flat-detector CT setup to simulate the clinical CAC scoring protocol. We applied filtered back projection (FBP) and two IR algorithms with different regularization strengths. We compared the air kerma values, image quality parameters [noise magnitude, noise power spectrum, modulation transfer function (MTF), and contrast-to-noise ratio], and CaHA quantification accuracy between FBP and IR. Results: IR regularization strength influenced CAC scores significantly ( p < 0.05 ). The CAC volumes and scores between FBP and IRs were the most similar when the IR regularization strength was chosen to match the MTF of the FBP reconstruction. Conclusion: When the regularization strength is selected to produce comparable spatial resolution with FBP, IR can yield comparable CAC scores and volumes with FBP. Nonetheless, at the lowest radiation dose setting, FBP produced more accurate CAC volumes and scores compared to IR, and no improved CAC scoring accuracy at low dose was demonstrated with the utilized IR methods.
Purpose: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring with computed tomography (CT) has been proposed as a screening tool for coronary artery disease, but concerns remain regarding the radiation dose of CT CAC scoring. Photon counting detectors and iterative reconstruction (IR) are promising approaches for patient dose reduction, yet the preservation of CAC scores with IR has been questioned. The purpose of this study was to investigate the applicability of IR for quantification of CAC using a photon counting flat-detector. Approach: We imaged a cardiac rod phantom with calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA) inserts with different noise levels using an experimental photon counting flat-detector CT setup to simulate the clinical CAC scoring protocol. We applied filtered back projection (FBP) and two IR algorithms with different regularization strengths. We compared the air kerma values, image quality parameters [noise magnitude, noise power spectrum, modulation transfer function (MTF), and contrast-to-noise ratio], and CaHA quantification accuracy between FBP and IR. Results: IR regularization strength influenced CAC scores significantly ( p < 0.05 ). The CAC volumes and scores between FBP and IRs were the most similar when the IR regularization strength was chosen to match the MTF of the FBP reconstruction. Conclusion: When the regularization strength is selected to produce comparable spatial resolution with FBP, IR can yield comparable CAC scores and volumes with FBP. Nonetheless, at the lowest radiation dose setting, FBP produced more accurate CAC volumes and scores compared to IR, and no improved CAC scoring accuracy at low dose was demonstrated with the utilized IR methods.
Authors: Martin J Willemink; Tim Leiner; Pim A de Jong; Linda M de Heer; Rutger A J Nievelstein; Arnold M R Schilham; Ricardo P J Budde Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-01-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Rolf Symons; Daniel S Reich; Mohammadhadi Bagheri; Tyler E Cork; Bernhard Krauss; Stefan Ulzheimer; Steffen Kappler; David A Bluemke; Amir Pourmorteza Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Andreas Schindler; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; U Joseph Schoepf; Philipp Blanke; Ullrich Ebersberger; Young Jun Cho; Thomas Allmendinger; Sebastian Vogt; Rainer Raupach; Christian Fink; Tobias Saam; Fabian Bamberg; Konstantin Nikolaou; Paul Apfaltrer Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-11-06 Impact factor: 11.105