T P A Baltes1, A J van der Veen2, L Blankevoort1, J C E Donders1, P Kloen1. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 2. Department of Physics and Medical Technology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Various studies have reported the use of the 95-degree condylar blade plate in the treatment of a subtrochanteric fracture or non-union. However, the holding power of standard screws in the metaphyseal and diaphyseal area is often diminished due to osteopenia. The alternative in this area is the use of locking plates, Schühlis or AO-nuts. With the latter two, non-locking screws in the blade plate can be converted to a fixed angle fixation. The objective of this study was to compare the stiffness and strength of the AO-nut augmented 95-degree condylar blade plate construct with that of a locking plate construct. In addition, a clinical series of eight patients treated with the AO-nut augmented 95-degree condylar blade plate construct is presented. METHODS: Single screw-plate constructs of a 5.0 mm locking screw/locking compression plate (LCP) and a 4.5 mm non-locking screw/4.5 mm dynamic compression plate (DCP), converted to a fixed-angle screw construct using AO-nuts, were tested by cantilever bending. During loading, force and displacement were recorded, from which the bending stiffness (N/mm) and the yield strength (N) were determined. Secondarily, all patients that underwent surgical treatment for subtrochanteric fracture, malunion or non-union by the senior author using this technique, underwent chart review. RESULTS: The stiffness of the locking screws was about four times higher compared to the AO-nut augmented construct. The yield strength was 2.3 times higher for the locking screw construct. In none of the eight patients treated with the fixed-angle blade plate, failure of the AO-nut augmented construct occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Although the stiffness and strength of the AO-nut augmented construct is less than of the locking screw, excellent clinical outcomes can be achieved utilizing this construct.
OBJECTIVES: Various studies have reported the use of the 95-degree condylar blade plate in the treatment of a subtrochanteric fracture or non-union. However, the holding power of standard screws in the metaphyseal and diaphyseal area is often diminished due to osteopenia. The alternative in this area is the use of locking plates, Schühlis or AO-nuts. With the latter two, non-locking screws in the blade plate can be converted to a fixed angle fixation. The objective of this study was to compare the stiffness and strength of the AO-nut augmented 95-degree condylar blade plate construct with that of a locking plate construct. In addition, a clinical series of eight patients treated with the AO-nut augmented 95-degree condylar blade plate construct is presented. METHODS: Single screw-plate constructs of a 5.0 mm locking screw/locking compression plate (LCP) and a 4.5 mm non-locking screw/4.5 mm dynamic compression plate (DCP), converted to a fixed-angle screw construct using AO-nuts, were tested by cantilever bending. During loading, force and displacement were recorded, from which the bending stiffness (N/mm) and the yield strength (N) were determined. Secondarily, all patients that underwent surgical treatment for subtrochanteric fracture, malunion or non-union by the senior author using this technique, underwent chart review. RESULTS: The stiffness of the locking screws was about four times higher compared to the AO-nut augmented construct. The yield strength was 2.3 times higher for the locking screw construct. In none of the eight patients treated with the fixed-angle blade plate, failure of the AO-nut augmented construct occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Although the stiffness and strength of the AO-nut augmented construct is less than of the locking screw, excellent clinical outcomes can be achieved utilizing this construct.
Authors: John E Tidwell; Evan P Roush; Cassandra L Ondeck; Allen R Kunselman; J Spence Reid; Gregory S Lewis Journal: Injury Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: Marschall B Berkes; Milton T M Little; Lionel E Lazaro; Rachel M Cymerman; David L Helfet; Dean G Lorich Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Mark Lenz; Dieter Wahl; Ivan Zderic; Boyko Gueorguiev; Jesse B Jupiter; Stephan M Perren Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2015-12-10 Impact factor: 3.494