Literature DB >> 33715331

Myometrial thickness overlying cesarean scar pregnancy is significantly associated with isthmocele formation in the third month of the postoperative period.

Resul Karakuş1, Sultan Seren Karakuş1, Burak Güler1, Gökhan Ünver1, Enis Özkaya1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine some associated factors for isthmocele formation 3 months after the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective consecutive case series of CSP managed by fertility preservation modalities at a single tertiary care center from May 2016 to March 2019 (n=95). Patients with a diagnosis of CSP were identified and followed prospectively to collect data on the patients' demographics; detailed medical, surgical, and social history; symptoms; imaging and laboratory parameters at the time of CSP diagnosis and during treatment; treatment modalities, myometrial thickness; and outcomes in terms of isthmocele formation.
RESULTS: Mean myometrial thickness overlying scar pregnancy was significantly lower in the group with isthmocele formation, and the mean gestational age of scar pregnancy was also significantly lower in the group with isthmocele formation following treatment of scar pregnancy (p<0.05). Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to determine associations between certain variables and isthmocele development, which revealed that the gestational age of scar pregnancy and myometrial thickness were significantly associated with isthmocele formation.
CONCLUSION: Myometrial thickness and gestational age of scar pregnancy were significantly associated with isthmocele formation 3 months after treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Isthmocele; cesarean; myometrial thickness; scar pregnancy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33715331      PMCID: PMC7962161          DOI: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.65288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 2149-9330


  30 in total

1.  Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean delivery scar: a case report.

Authors:  Donald L Fylstra; Toya Pound-Chang; M Grant Miller; Amy Cooper; Kathryn M Miller
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Caesarean scar pregnancy.

Authors:  A Ash; A Smith; D Maxwell
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors.

Authors:  D Ofili-Yebovi; J Ben-Nagi; E Sawyer; J Yazbek; C Lee; J Gonzalez; D Jurkovic
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 4.  Caesarean scar pregnancy: a review of management options.

Authors:  Katarzyna Litwicka; Ermanno Greco
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.927

5.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic removal of cesarean scar ectopic and hysterotomy revision.

Authors:  Matthew T Siedhoff; Lauren D Schiff; Janelle K Moulder; Tarek Toubia; Thomas Ivester
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Conservative treatment of ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean scar.

Authors:  Olivier Graesslin; Frédéric Dedecker; Christian Quereux; René Gabriel
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Reproductive outcomes of women with a previous history of Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancies.

Authors:  J Ben Nagi; S Helmy; D Ofili-Yebovi; J Yazbek; E Sawyer; D Jurkovic
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Resectoscopic correction of the "isthmocele" in women with postmenstrual abnormal uterine bleeding and secondary infertility.

Authors:  Giampietro Gubbini; Paolo Casadio; Elena Marra
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.137

9.  Caesarean scar pregnancy in the UK: a national cohort study.

Authors:  H M Harb; M Knight; C Bottomley; C Overton; A Tobias; I D Gallos; M Shehmar; R Farquharson; A Horne; P Latthe; E Edi-Osagie; M MacLean; E Marston; J Zamora; F Dawood; R Small; J Ross; T Bourne; A Coomarasamy; D Jurkovic
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 6.531

10.  Comparison Of Three Different Treatment Methods For Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.

Authors:  Hui Fei; Xuefeng Jiang; Tian Li; Ying Pan; Hongling Guo; Xiaoyu Xu; Shanrong Shu
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Caesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Case Report and a Literature Review.

Authors:  George Valasoulis; Ioulia Magaliou; Dimitrios Koufidis; Antonios Garas; Alexandros Daponte
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 2.948

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.