Literature DB >> 17313383

Caesarean scar pregnancy.

A Ash1, A Smith, D Maxwell.   

Abstract

Caesarean scar pregnancy is one of the rarest forms of ectopic pregnancy. Little is known about its incidence and natural history. With increasing incidence of caesarean section worldwide, more and more cases are diagnosed and reported. Transvaginal ultrasound and colour flow Doppler provides a high diagnostic accuracy with very few false positives. A delay in diagnosis and/or treatment can lead to uterine rupture, major haemorrhage, hysterectomy and serious maternal morbidity. Early diagnosis can offer treatment options of avoiding uterine rupture and haemorrhage, thus preserving the uterus and future fertility. Management plan should be individually tailored. Available data suggest that termination of pregnancy is the treatment of choice in the first trimester soon after the diagnosis. Expectant treatment has a poor prognosis because of risk of rupture. There are no reliable scientific data on the risk of recurrence of the condition in future pregnancy, role of the interval between the previous caesarean delivery and occurrence of caesarean scar pregnancy, and effect of caesarean wound closure technique on caesarean scar pregnancy. In this article, we aim to find the demography, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, most appropriate methods of diagnosis and management, with their implications in clinical practice for this condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17313383     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01237.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  84 in total

Review 1.  Comparison between modified Misgav-Ladach and Pfannenstiel-Kerr techniques for Cesarean section: review of literature.

Authors:  Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Ilaria Marilli; Pietro Cignini; Francesco Padula; Laura D'Emidio; Lucia Mangiafico; Agnese Maria Chiara Rapisarda; Ferdinando Antonio Gulino; Stefano Cianci; Antonio Biondi; Claudio Giorlandino
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun

Review 2.  Scar Ectopic Pregnancy.

Authors:  Madhuri Arvind Patel
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-11-21

3.  A case of spontaneous tubal pregnancy with caesarean scar pregnancy.

Authors:  Jie Zhu; Yue-Ying Shen; Yu-Qing Zhao; Ru Lin; Fang Fang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-09-15

4.  Embryo Implantation in the Region of a Previous Caesarean Section Scar and Scar Dehiscence in Second Trimester: A Rare Case Report.

Authors:  Shikha Jain; Neha Jain; Swati Chaudhary
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-04-27

5.  Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: Some Management Options.

Authors:  Chandrashekhar V Hegde
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2017-04-11

6.  MR imaging of ectopic pregnancy with an emphasis on unusual implantation sites.

Authors:  Mert Köroğlu; Arda Kayhan; Fatma Nur Soylu; Bekir Erol; Christine Schmid-Tannwald; Cemil Gürses; İbrahim Karademir; Randy Ernst; Ambereen Yousuf; Aytekin Oto
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Injection of MTX for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: comparison between different methods.

Authors:  Xiang-Hua Yin; Shi-Zhang Yang; Zhong-Qin Wang; Hong-Yan Jia; Min Shi
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-07-15

8.  Minimally invasive surgery to manage a complicated case of a caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Xiaohui Ong; Manisha Mathur
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-02-06

9.  Management of a Viable Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Case Report.

Authors:  Mini Mammen Roy; Forough Radfar
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2017-03

Review 10.  Risk factors for massive hemorrhage during the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuan Zhang; Zhongyun Zhang; Xiaoyan Liu; Lei Zhang; Fanzhen Hong; Ming Lu
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 2.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.