Literature DB >> 25499261

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic removal of cesarean scar ectopic and hysterotomy revision.

Matthew T Siedhoff1, Lauren D Schiff2, Janelle K Moulder2, Tarek Toubia2, Thomas Ivester3.   

Abstract

A 38-year-old gravida 6 para 2042 woman presented in consultation regarding management of a uterine defect, or "niche," following resolution of a cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. She had 3 prior losses, followed by in vitro fertilization that resulted in 2 healthy births, both delivered by cesarean. A third in vitro embryo transfer resulted in the cesarean scar ectopic. After consideration of treatment options, she underwent multiple-dose parenteral methotrexate with eventual termination of the ectopic. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a uterine defect, suspected to contain residual pregnancy tissue. Questions considered in her consultation included whether the defect should be repaired and, if so, from a hysteroscopic or laparoscopic approach, as well as her risk of intrauterine scarring, when, or if, it would be safe to pursue another pregnancy, and her subsequent risk of uterine rupture. Literature review regarding cesarean niche was helpful, but did not seem to completely inform this particular clinical scenario. She elected to proceed with robotic-assisted laparoscopic repair. The vesicovaginal space was opened to expose the defect. Dilute vasopressin was injected circumferentially around the defect to help minimize the use of electrosurgery in opening the hysterotomy. Scar overlying the defect was resected and pregnancy tissue removed. The hysterotomy was closed with delayed-absorbable barbed suture, extrapolating technique from laparoscopic myomectomy. The first layer was imbricated with a second, similar to a 2-layer closure in cesarean delivery. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging revealed resolution of the defect. After several failed attempts at repeat in vitro fertilization, spontaneous pregnancy was achieved 18 months postoperatively. The pregnancy was uncomplicated and she underwent scheduled cesarean delivery of a healthy neonate at 37 weeks' gestation. The lower uterine segment was thick and developed, with no evidence of a dehiscence.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cesarean scar ectopic; robotic-assisted laparoscopy; uterine niche

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25499261     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

1.  The effect of laparoscopic resection of large niches in the uterine caesarean scar on symptoms, ultrasound findings and quality of life: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ajmw Vervoort; J Vissers; Wjk Hehenkamp; Ham Brölmann; Jaf Huirne
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 2.  Incidence, diagnosis and management of tubal and nontubal ectopic pregnancies: a review.

Authors:  Danielle M Panelli; Catherine H Phillips; Paula C Brady
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2015-10-15

3.  The Rising Triad of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy, Placenta Percreta, and Uterine Rupture: A Case Report and Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Nikolina Docheva; Emily D Slutsky; Nicolette Borella; Renee Mason; James W Van Hook; Sonyoung Seo-Patel
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-06-07

4.  Comparison Of Three Different Treatment Methods For Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.

Authors:  Hui Fei; Xuefeng Jiang; Tian Li; Ying Pan; Hongling Guo; Xiaoyu Xu; Shanrong Shu
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Myometrial thickness overlying cesarean scar pregnancy is significantly associated with isthmocele formation in the third month of the postoperative period.

Authors:  Resul Karakuş; Sultan Seren Karakuş; Burak Güler; Gökhan Ünver; Enis Özkaya
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-03-12

6.  A New Modified Hysteroscopic-Laparoscopic Surgery for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy of Stable Type III.

Authors:  Jiang Yang; Bingshu Li; Jin Liu; Wanlin Zeng; Li Hong
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-06-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.